Skip to main content
Log in

Bundle Relaxation and Primal Recovery in Unit Commitment Problems. The Brazilian Case

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the inclusion of commitment of thermal generation units in the optimal management of the Brazilian power system. By means of Lagrangian relaxation we decompose the problem and obtain a nondifferentiable dual function that is separable. We solve the dual problem with a bundle method. Our purpose is twofold: first, bundle methods are the methods of choice in nonsmooth optimization when it comes to solve large-scale problems with high precision. Second, they give good starting points for recovering primal solutions. We use an inexact augmented Lagrangian technique to find a near-optimal primal feasible solution. We assess our approach with numerical results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Bacaud, C. Lemaréchal, A. Renaud and C. Sagastizábal, Bundle methods in stochastic optimal power management: A disaggregated approach using preconditioners, Comput. Optim. Appl. 20(3) (2001) 227–244.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Batut and A. Renaud, Daily generation scheduling with transmission constraints: A new class of algorithms, IEEE Trans. Power Systems 7 (1992) 982–989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Bertsekas, Nonlinear Programming (Athena Scientific, 1995).

  4. H. Blondel and A. Renaud, Décomposition par les prix et Lagrangien augmenté: Une association efficace pour le traitement des problèmes de production, EDF Bull. Direction Études Rech. Sér. C Math. Inform. 4(iii) (1992) 23–43.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Bonnans, J. Gilbert, C. Lemaréchal and C. Sagastizábal, Numerical Optimization. Theoretical and Practical Aspects, Universitext (Springer, Berlin, 2002) pp. xiv+423.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Casas and C. Pola, An algorithm for indefinite quadratic programming based on a partial Cholesky factorization, RAIRO Rech. Opér. 27(4) (1993) 401–426.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Cheney and A. Goldstein, Newton's method for convex programming and Tchebycheff approximations, Numer. Math. 1 (1959) 253–268.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Cohen and D.L. Zhu, Decomposition coordination methods in large scale optimization problems: The nondifferentiable case and the use of augmented Lagrangians, in: Advances in Large Scale Systems, Vol. 1 (JAI, Greenwich, CT, 1984) pp. 203–266.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A.J. Conejo and N.J. Redondo, Short-term hydro-thermal coordination by Lagrangian relaxation: Solution of the dual problem, IEEE Trans. Power Systems 14(1) (1999) 89–95.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.-C. Culioli and G. Cohen, Decomposition/coordination algorithms in stochastic optimization, SIAM J. Control Optim. 28(6) (1990) 1372–1403.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Feltenmark and K.C. Kiwiel, Dual applications of proximal bundle methods, including Lagrangian relaxation of nonconvex problems, SIAM J. Optim. 10(3) (2000) 697–721 (electronic).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Goffin, On convergence rates of subgradient optimization methods, Math. Programming 13 (1977) 329–347.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Guignard and S. Kim, Lagrangian decomposition: A model yielding stronger Lagrangian bounds, Math. Programming 39(2) (1987) 215–228.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.E. Kelley, The cutting plane method for solving convex programs, J. Soc. Industr. Appl. Math. 8 (1960) 703–712.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S.-Y. Lai and R. Baldick, Unit commitment with ramp multipliers, IEEE Trans. Power Systems 14(1) (1999) 58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Lemaréchal, F. Pellegrino, A. Renaud and C. Sagastizábal, Bundle methods applied to the unitcommitment problem, in: System Modelling and Optimization, eds. J. Doležal and J. Fidler (Chapman and Hall, London, 1996) pp. 395–402.

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. Lemaréchal and A. Renaud, A geometric study of duality gaps, with applications, Math. Programming Ser. A 90(3) (2001) 399–427.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. Lemaréchal and C. Sagastizábal, Variable metric bundle methods: from conceptual to implementable forms, Math. Programming 76 (1997) 393–410.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Maceira, C. Mercio, B. Gorenstin, S. Cunha, C. Suanno, M. Sacramento and A. Kligerman, Aplicacão do modelo NEWAVE na avaliacão energética das interligacoes dos sistemas norte/nordeste e sul/sudeste brasileiro, in: VI Symposium of Specialists in Eletric Operational and Expansion Planning, Bahia, Brazil, Electronic version (CD) (1998).

  20. M. Maceira, L. Terry, A. Diniz, L. de Souza, F. Costa, S. Romero, S. Binato, S. Amado, C. Vilasboas and R. Vilanova, Despacho de Geracão horário com representacão detalhada de restricões hidraulicas, in: VII Symposium of Specialists in Eletric Operational and Expansion Planning, Curitiba, Brazil, SP-063, Electronic version (CD) (2000).

  21. A. Merlin and P. Sandrin, A new method for unit commitment at Électricité de France, IEEE Trans. Power Aparatus Systems 102(5) (1983) 1218–1225.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M.V.F. Pereira and L.M.V.G. Pinto, Multi-stage stochastic optimization applied to energy planning, Math. Programming 52 (1991) 359–375.

    Google Scholar 

  23. G.B. Sheble and G. Fahd, Unit commitment literature synopsis, IEEE Trans. Power Systems 9(1) (1994) 128–135.

    Google Scholar 

  24. N. Shor, Minimization Methods for Non-differentiable Functions (Springer, Berlin, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  25. G. Zhuang and F. Galiana, Towards a more rigourous and practical unit commitment by Lagrangian relaxation, IEEE Trans. Power Systems 3 (1988) 763–773.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C.A. Sagastizábal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Belloni, A., Lima, A.D.S., Maceira, M.P. et al. Bundle Relaxation and Primal Recovery in Unit Commitment Problems. The Brazilian Case. Annals of Operations Research 120, 21–44 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023314026477

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023314026477

Navigation