Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Collectivistic and Individualistic Values: Their Effects on Group Dynamics and Productivity in China

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Collectivistic and individualistic values are theorized to have far reaching effects on teamwork and organizations. This study proposes that cooperative and competitive goal interdependence mediates the relationship between these values and group interaction and outcomes. Working in State Owned Enterprises in three regions of China, 689 employees in 194 teams indicated their group's values, goal interdependence, constructive controversy, and productivity. Their managers also reported on the extent these teams were productive. Structural equation analysis suggested that collectivistic values may reinforce cooperative goals and an open-minded discussion of views which in turn results in strong relationships and team productivity, as experienced from both the team's and manager's perspectives. Individualistic values, especially the horizontal version, can have contrasting effects through fostering competitive goals and closed-minded discussion. These results, coupled with previous research, suggest that collectivist values, cooperative goals, and constructive controversy provide an important foundation for productive teamwork.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelman, I. and C. T. Morris. (1967). Society, Politics and Economic Development: A Quantitative Approach. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alper, S., D. Tjosvold, and S. A. Law. (1998). “Interdependence and Controversy in Group Decision Making: Antecedents to Effective Self-Managing Teams,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 74, 33–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, D. (1966). The Duality of Human Existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management 17, 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J., F. L. Edwards, and A. H. Ringleb. (1992). “Organizational Responses to Legal Liability: Employee Exposure to Hazardous Materials, Vertical Integration, and Small Firm Production,” Academy of Management Journal 35, 328–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. and C. P. Chou. (1987). “Practical Issues in Structural Modeling,” Sociological Methods & Research 16, 78–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). “Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1, 185–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, W. T. (1963). A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. C., X. Chen, and J. R. Meindl. (1998). “How Can Cooperation be Fostered? The Cultural Effects of Individualism-Collectivism,” Academy of Management Review 23, 285–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. G. and G. E. Ledford, Jr. (1994). “The Effectiveness of Self-Managing Teams: A Quasi-Experiment,” Human Relations 47, 13–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, A. R., J. J. Jaccard, H. C. Triandis, M. L. Morales, and R. Diaz-Guerrero. (1976). “Cross-Cultural Model Testing: Toward a Solution of the Etic-Emic Dilemma,” International Journal of Psychology 11, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. and E. van de Vliert. (1997). Using Conflict in Organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1949). “A Theory of Cooperation and Competition,” Human Relations 2, 129–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1973). The Resolution of Conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1980). “Fifty Years of Conflict,” in L. Festinger (ed.), Retrospections on Social Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 46–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, P. S., R. Devadas, and T. L. Griffith-Hughson. (1988). “Groups and Productivity: Analyzing the Effectiveness of Self-Managing Teams,” in J. P. Campbell and R. J. Campbell (eds.), Productivity in Organizations: New Perspectives from Industrial and Organizational Psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 295–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruenfeld, D. H., E. A. Mannix, K. Y. Williams, and M. A. Neale. (1996). “Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Information Distribution Affect Process and Performance,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 67, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R. (1990). Groups That Work (And Those That Don't). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R. (1987). “The Design of Work Teams,” in J. Lorsch (ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 315–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, M., J. L. Cummings, and W. Hutabarat. (1999). “Cultural Stability or Change Among Managers in Indonesia?” Journal of International Business Studies, 30, 599–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1993). “Cultural Constraints in Management Theories,” The Academy of Management Executive, 7, 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkeles, A. and D. H. Smith. (1974). Becoming Modern. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., R. G. Demaree, and G. Wolf. (1984). “Estimating Within-Group Interrater Reliability With and Without Response Bias,” Journal of Applied Psychology 69, 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A. (1995). “A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict,” Administrative Science Quarterly 40, 256–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A. (1997). “A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 530–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. and E. Weldon. (1992). A Comparative Study of Managerial Attitudes Toward Conflict in the United States and the People's Republic of China: Issues of Theory and Measurement. Paper presented at the Academy of Management, Las Vegas, NV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W. and R. T. Johnson. (1989). Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashima, Y., M. Siegel, K. Tanaka, and E. S. Kashima. (1992). “Do People Believe Behaviors are Consistent with Attitudes? Toward a Cultural Psychology of Attribution Processes,” British Journal of Social Psychology 331, 111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, U., H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, and G. Yoon. (1994). Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method and Applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkbride, P. S., S. F. Y. Tang, and R. I. Westwood. (1991). “Chinese Conflict Preferences and Negotiating Behaviour: Cultural and Psychological Influences,” Organization Studies 12, 365–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. M. and D. M. Messick. (1995). Negotiation as a Social Process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, D. C. and J. K. Murnighan. (1998). “Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional Dynamics of Organizational Groups,” Academy of Management Review 23, 325–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E. III, S. A. Mohrman, and G. E. Ledford Jr. (1995). Creating High Performance Organizations: Practices and Results of Employee Involvement and Total Quality Management in Fortune 1000 Companies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J. and J. Yoon. (1993). “Power and the Emergence of Commitment Behavior in Negotiated Exchange,” American Sociological Review 58, 465–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J. and J. Yoon. (1996). “Commitment in Exchange Relations: Test of a Theory of Relational Cohesion,” American Sociological Review 61, 89–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, D. and S. Sensiper. (1998), (Spring). “The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation,” California Management Review 40, 112–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K. (1997). “Negotiation and Reward Allocations Across Cultures,” in P. C. Earley and M. Erez (eds.), New perspectives on international industrial/organizational psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 640–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, S., L. C. Simmons, and R. Kali. (1999). “Guanxi versus the Market: Ethics and Efficiency,” Journal of International Business Studies 30, 231–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R. and S. Kitayama. (1991). “Culture and Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion and Motivation,” Psychological Review 98, 224–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J. E. and J. L. Farr. (1991). “Further Evidence for the Discriminant Validity of Measures of Organizational Commitment, Job Involvement, and Job Satisfaction,” Journal of Applied Psychology 76, 127–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J. E., D. A. Hofmann, and J. L. Farr. (1993). “Job Perception – Job Satisfaction Relations: An Empirical Comparison of Three Competing Theories,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 56, 370–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller J., D. M. Bersoff, and R. L. Harwood. (1990). “Perceptions of Social Responsibilities in India and the United States: Moral Imperatives or Personal Decisions?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58, 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J. and M. S. Clark. (1982). “Exchange and Communal Relationships,” in L. Wheeler (ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 3. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. W., K. Y. Williams, K. Leung, R. Larrick, M. T. Mendoza, D. Bhatnagar, J. Li, M. Kondo, J. L. Luo, and J. C. Hu. (1998). “Conflict Management Style: Accounting for Cross-National Differences,” Journal of International Business Studies, 29, 729–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. W., K. Leung, D. Ames, and B. Lickel. (1999). “Views From Inside and Outside: Integrating Emic and Etic Insights About Culture and Justice Judgment,” Academy of Management Review 24, 781–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1990), (Spring). “Redundant, Overalling Organization: A Japanese Approach to Managing the Innovation Process,” California Management Review 27–38.

  • Ouchi, W. (1981). Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, K. and R. E. Nisbett. (1999). “Culture, Dialectics, and Reasoning About Contradiction,” American Psychologist 54, 741–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1994). Competitive Advantage Through People: Unleashing the Power of the Work Force. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, D. (1992). “Organizational Productivity,” in M. D. Dunnette and L. M. Hough (eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 3. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, 443–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, D. A., C. P. Egri, S. Stewart, R. H. Terpstra, and Y. Kaicheng. (1999). “Doing Business in the 21st Century with the New Generation of Chinese Managers: A Study of Generational Shifts in Work Values in China,” Journal of International Business Studies 30, 415–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B. L. (1999). “Transfer of Marketing Know-How in International Strategic Alliances: An Empirical Investigation of the Role and Antecedents of Knowledge Ambiguity,” Journal of International Business 30, 463–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singelis, T. M., H. C. Triandis, D. S. P. Bhawuk, and M. Gelfand. (1995). “Horizontal and Vertical Dimensions of Individuals and Collectivism: A Theoretical and Measurement Refinement,” Cross-Cultural Research 29, 240–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (1987). “Method Variance as an Artifact in Self-Reported Affect and Perceptions at Work: Myth or Significant Problem,” Journal of Applied Psychology 72, 438–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E., and M. T. Brannick. (1995). “The Nature and Effects of Method Variance in Organizational Research,” in C. L. Cooper and I. T. Robertson (eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chichester: Wiley, 249–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanne, M. B., D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson. (1999). “Does Competition Enhance or Inhibit Motor Performance: A Meta-Analysis,” Psychological Bulletin 125, 133–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). “A Face Negotiation Theory,” in Y. Y. Kim and W. B. Gudykunst (eds.), Theory and Intercultural Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 47–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D. (1982). “Effects of the Approach to Controversy on Superiors' Incorporation of Subordinates' Information in Decision Making,” Journal of Applied Psychology 67,189–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D. (1989). Team Organization: An Enduring Competitive Advantage. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D. (1991). Conflict-Positive Organization: Stimulate Diversity and Create Unity. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D. (1998). “The Cooperative and Competitive Goal Approach to Conflict: Accomplishments and Challenges,” Applied Psychology: An International Review 47, 285–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D. and D. K. Deemer. (1980). “Effects of Controversy Within a Cooperative or Competitive Context on Organizational Decision-Making,” Journal of Applied Psychology 65, 590–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D. and D. W. Johnson. (1977). “The Effects of Controversy on Cognitive Perspective Taking,” Journal of Educational Psychology 69, 679–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D. and M. M. Tjosvold. (1991). Leading the Team Organization: How to Create an Enduring Competitive Advantage. New York: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D. and M. M. Tjosvold. (1995). “Cooperation Theory, Constructive Controversy, and Effectiveness: Learning from Crises,” in R. A. Guzzo and E. Salas (eds.), Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 79–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D. and H. Sun. (1998). Openness among Chinese in Conflict: Effects of Direct Discussion and Warmth on Integrated Decision Making. Paper submitted for publication. Lingnan University, Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D. and Z. M. Wang. (1998), (August). Cooperative Goals and Constructive Controversy in Work Teams in China: Antecedents for Performance. Paper, Academy of Management Meetings, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D., D. W. Johnson, and L. Fabrey. (1980). “The Effects of Affirmation and Acceptance on Incorporation of an Opposing Opinion in Problem Solving,” Psychological Reports 47, 1043–1053.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D., D. W. Johnson, and J. Lerner. (1981). “The Effects of Affirmation and Acceptance on Incorporation of an Opposing Opinion in Problem-Solving,” Journal of Social Psychology 114, 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D., W. C. Wedley, and R. H. Field. (1986). “Constructive Controversy, the Vroom-Yetton Model, and Managerial Decision Making,” Journal of Occupational Behaviour 7, 125–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1989). “The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts,” Psychological Review 96, 506–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1990). “Cross-Cultural Studies of Individualism and Collectivism,” in J. Berman (ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1989.Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press, 41–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H, C. (1995). Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. and M. J. Gelfand. (1998). “Converging Measurement of Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74, 118–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trompenaars, F. (1993). Riding the Waves of Culture. London: Economist Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tse, D. K., J. Francis, and J. Walls. (1994). “Cultural Differences in Conducting Intra-and Inter-Cultural Negotiations: A Sino-Canadian Comparison,” Journal of International Business Studies 24, 537–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tung, R. (1991). “Handshakes Across the Sea: Cross-Cultural Negotiating for Business Success,” Organizational Dynamics 14, 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1994), (Winter). “An Efficiency Criterion for Marketing Design,” Journal of Marketing Research, 462–470.

  • Wheeler, L., H. T. Reis, and M. H. Bond. (1989). “Collectivism-Individualism in Everyday Social Life: The Middle Kingdom and the Melting Pot,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57, 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T. and M. Yamagishi. (1994). “Trust and Commitment in the United States and Japan,” Motivation and Emotion 18, 129–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T., M. Kikuchi, and M. Kosugi. (1999). “Trust, Gullibility, and Social Intelligence,” Asian Journal of Social Psychology 2, 145–161.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, Lingnan University, Hong Kong

    Dean Tjosvold

  2. Department of Management of Organizations, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong

    Kenneth S. Law

  3. Management School, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China

    Haifa F. Sun

Authors
  1. Dean Tjosvold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kenneth S. Law
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haifa F. Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tjosvold, D., Law, K.S. & Sun, H.F. Collectivistic and Individualistic Values: Their Effects on Group Dynamics and Productivity in China. Group Decision and Negotiation 12, 243–263 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023383200180

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023383200180

Search

Navigation