Abstract
Genetic diversity among 26 cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. var. sativus) accessions from five African countries [Algeria (1), Egypt (21), Ethiopia (2), Kenya (1), and Libya (1)] present in the U.S. National Plant Germplasm System (NPGS) were examined by assessing variation at 71 polymorphic random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) loci. Genetic distances (GD; simple matching coefficient) were estimated among these African accessions and a reference array (RA) of 21 accessions representative of the genetic variation in cucumber. GD among African accessions ranged between 0.41 and 0.97. GD among accessions in the reference array ranged between 0.36 and 0.88. Multivariate analysis identified three distinct groupings (1–3) of African accessions; Group 1 contained 21 accessions (Egypt, Ethiopia and Libya), Group 2 consisted of two accessions (Kenya, Algeria), and Group 3 possessed three accessions (Egypt). These groupings were distinct from each other (P > 0.001). Accessions in Group 1 differed genetically from all other accessions examined (P > 0.01), and accessions in Groups 2 and 3 were uniquely associated with several RA accessions. While GD among accessions in Group 1 ranged between 0.52 and 0.90, distances among Group 2 accessions varied between 0.93 and 0.97. The GD between the two accessions in Group 3 was 0.65. An accession from Syria (PI 181874) and from one Turkey (PI 199383) were genetically more similar to accessions in Group 1 than to other accessions in the RA. Likewise, accessions in Group 2 were genetically similar to two RA accessions from China and a European glasshouse cucumber line, and Group 3 accessions showed genetic affinities with the U.S. market class cultivar Dasher II. Data suggest that some Egyptian accessions (Group 1) possess unique genetic variation, that this germplasm has potential for broadening the genetic base of commerical cucumber, and that further collection of African germplasm is likely to enhance genetic diversity of cucumber in NPGS.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dijkhuizen A., Kennard W.C., Havey M.J. and Staub J.E. 1996. RFLP variability and genetic relationships in cultivated cucumber. Euphytica 90: 79-89.
Horejsi T. and Staub J.E. 1999. Genetic variation in cucumber as assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNAs. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 46: 337-350.
Horejsi T., Staub J.E. and Thomas C. 2000. Linkage of random amplified polymorphic DNA markers to downy mildew resistance in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Euphytica 115: 105-113.
Jeffrey C. 1980. A review of the Cucurbitaceae. Bot. J. Linnean Soc. 81: 223-247.
Kirkbride J.H. Jr 1993. Biosystematic monograph of the genus-Cucumis(Cucurbitaceae). Parkway Publishers, Boone, North Carolina, p. 59.
Knerr L.D., Staub J.E., Holder D.J. and May B.P. 1989. Genetic diversity in Cucumis sativus L. as assessed by variation at 18 havallozyme coding loci. Theor. Appl. Genet. 78: 119-128.
Kruskal J.B. and Wish M. 1978. Multidimensional scaling. In: Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Sage Publ., Beverly Hills, California.
Leppik E.E. 1966. Searching gene centers of the genus Cucumis through host-parasite relationship. Euphytica 15: 323-328.
Maniatis T., Fritsch E.F. and Sambrook J. 1982. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
Meglic V., Serquen F. and Staub J.E. 1996. Genetic diversity in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.): I. A reevaluation of the U.S. germplasm collection. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 43: 533-546.
Serquen F.C., Bacher J. and Staub J.E. 1997. Mapping and QTL acanalysis of horticultural traits in a narrow cross in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) using random-amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Mol. Breed. 31: 729-741.
Sokal R.R. and Sneath P.H. 1963. Principles of numerical taxonomy. Freeman, San Francisco, California, 369 pp.
Sokal R.R. and Rohlf F.J. 1981. Biometry. 2nd edn. Freeman, San Francisco, California.
Spooner D.M., Tivang J., Nienhuis J., Miller J.T., Douches D.S. and Contreras M A. 1996. Comparison of four molecular markers in measuring relationships among the wild potato relatives Solanum section Etuberosum (subgenus Potato). Theor. Appl. Genet. 92: 532-540.
Staub J.E., Bacher J. and Poetter J.D. 1996. Sources of potential errors in the application of random amplified polymorphic DNA in cucumber. Hortscience 31: 262-266.
Staub J.E. and Bacher J. 1997. Cucumber as a processed vegetable. In: Processing vegetables: Science and Technology IV. Tech-nomic Publishing Co., Inc., Lancaster, PA.
Staub J.E., Serquen F.C. and McCreight J.D. 1997a. Genetic diversity in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.): III. An evaluation of Indian germplasm. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 44: 315-326.
Staub J.E., Box J., Meglic V., Horejsi T.F. and McCreight J.D. 1997b. Comparison of isozyme and random amplified poly-morphic DNA data for determining intraspecific variation in Cucumis. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 44: 257-269.
Staub J.E., Serquen F.C., Horejsi T. and Chen J.F. 1999. Genetic diversity in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.): IV. An evaluation of Chinese germplasm. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 46: 297-310.
Tatlioglu Y. 1993. Cucumber Cucumis sativus L. In: Kalloo G. and Begh B.O. (eds), Genetic improvement of vegetable crops. Pergamon Press Ltd., Tarrytown, N.Y. pp. 1976234.
Waugh R. and Powell W. 1992. Using RAPD markers for crop improvement. Trends in Biotech. 10: 186-191.
Wilkinson L. 1989. SYSTAT: the system for statistics. SYSTAT Inc., Evanston, Illinois.
Williams J.G.K., Kubelik A.R., Livak K.J., Rafalski J.A. and Tingey S.V. 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucl. Acids Res. 18: 6531-6535.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mliki, A., Staub, J.E., Zhangyong, S. et al. Genetic diversity in African cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) provides potential for germplasm enhancement. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 50, 461–468 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023957813397
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023957813397