Abstract
Quantum generalizations of conventional games broaden the range of available strategies, which can help improve outcomes for the participants. With many players, such quantum games can involve entanglement among many states which is difficult to implement, especially if the states must be communicated over some distance. This paper describes a quantum approach to the economically significant n-player public goods game that requires only two-particle entanglement and is thus much easier to implement than more general quantum mechanisms. In spite of the large temptation to free ride on the efforts of others in the original game, two-particle entanglement is sufficient to give near optimal expected payoff when players use a simple mixed strategy for which no player can benefit by making different choices. This mechanism can also address some heterogeneous preferences among the players.
PACS: 03.67-a; 02.50Le; 89.65.Gh
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
P. W. Shor, in S. Goldwasser (ed.), Proc. of the 35th Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 124-134, Los Alamitos, CA, November (IEEE Press, 1994).
D. A. Meyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1052–1055 (1999).
J. Eisert, M. Wilkens, and M. Lewenstein, Phy. Rev. Lett. 83, 3077–3080 (1999).
J. Eisert and M. Wilkens, J. Modern Optics 47, 2543–2556 (2000).
Jiangfeng Du et al., Phys. Lett. A 302, 229–233 (2002).
Jiangfeng Du et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 137902 (2002).
S. C. Benjamin and P. M. Hayden, Phys. Rev. A 64, 030301 (2001).
G. Hardin, Science 162, 1243 (1968).
P. G. Kwiat et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4725–4728 (1999).
J.-W. Pan, C. Simon, Č. Brukner, and A. Zeilinger, Nature 410, 1067–1070 (2001).
D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, M. Daniell, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1345–1349 (1999).
J.-W. Pan, M. Daniell, S. Gasparoni, G. Weihs, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4435–4438 (2001).
E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, Nature 409, 46–52 (2001).
Z. Yuan et al., Electrically driven single-photon source. Science 295, 102–105 (2002).
S. Tanzilli et al., Electron. Lett. 37, 27–28 (2001).
E. J. Mason et al., Los Alamos preprint quant-ph/0207156 (2002).
O. Benson, C. Santori, M. Pelton, and Y. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2513–2516 (2000).
T. Groves and J. O. Ledyard, Econometrica 45, 783–809 (1977).
J. Ledyard, in Handbook of Experimental Economics, John Kagel and Alvin Roth (eds) Chapter 2, (Princeton University Press, 1995), pp. 111-181.
E. Rasmusen, Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory (Basil Blackwell, 1989).
R. Aumann and S. Hart (eds.), Handbook of Game Theory with Economics Applications, Volume 1, (Elsevier, 1992).
D. Kreps, A Course in Microeconomic Theory (Princeton University Press, 1990).
S. J. van Enk and R. Pike, Phys. Rev. A 66, 024306 (2002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, KY., Hogg, T. & Beausoleil, R. A Quantum Treatment of Public Goods Economics. Quantum Information Processing 1, 449–469 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024070415465
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024070415465