Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fish zonations and guilds as the basis for assessment of ecological integrity of large rivers

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Longitudinal zonation concepts describe the downstream changes in chemico-physical and biological properties of rivers. Including information on ecological fish guilds can enhance the usefulness of fish zonation concepts, in a way that they can be used as tools for assessment and management of the ecological integrity of large rivers. We present an ecological characterization of fish zones and fish communities in near-natural and in regulated large rivers in Europe (the River Doubs in France and the Rivers Rhine and Meuse in the Netherlands), using guild classifications of several life-history traits of fish and national Red Lists of threatened species. The Doubs data set was also analyzed using indices of the sensitivity of fish species to environmental degradation and indices for eurytopy. In these rivers, the number of ecological guilds per zone increases downstream, and there are clear shifts in the structure of the guilds. Flow preference and reproduction ecology of river fish are closely linked. The proportion of rheophilic species in the fish community decreases downstream, and the proportions of limnophilic and eurytopic species increase. Lithophilic and psammophilic spawners are dominant in the upper zones, whereas the lower zones are dominated by phytophilic and phytolithophilic spawners. The proportion of zoobenthivorous and periphytivorous species decreases downstream, and the proportion of zooplanktivorous and phytivorous species increases. However, because the European fish fauna mainly consists of feeding generalists, the discriminative abilities of simplistic feeding guild classifications are not very high. Guilds of sensitive, stenoecious species that share life history strategies that are highly adapted to specific riverine conditions (rheophils and limnophils) have declined far more than generalist species that can survive in a wide range of habitats that are not characteristic of natural river ecosystems. Because of the subsequent over-abundance of the eurytopic species the original longitudinal fish zonations are hardly recognizable anymore in heavily impacted large rivers such as the River Rhine. Hence these rivers do not meet the criteria for ecological integrity. Within a specific fish region, a suitable way of analyzing and monitoring the impact of human disturbance on the structure of the fish community is by comparing the guild structure of the present state of a fish zone with that of the reference situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarts, B. G. W. & P. H. Nienhuis, 1999. Ecological sustainability and biodiversity. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 6: 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aarts, B. G. W., F.W. B. van den Brink & P. H. Nienhuis (in press). Habitat loss as the main cause of the stagnating recovery of the fish faunas of regulated large rivers in Europe: the transversal floodplain gradient. River Res. Appl.

  • Admiraal, W., G. van der Velde, H. Smit & W. G. Cazemier, 1993. The rivers Rhine and Meuse in The Netherlands: present state and signs of ecological recovery. Hydrobiologia 265: 97–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, J. D., 1995. Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Water. Chapman & Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, M. B., J. T. Finn & H. E. Booke, 1988. Streamflow regulation and fish community structure. Ecology 69: 382–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balon, E. K., 1975a. Reproductive guilds of fishes: a proposal and definition. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 32: 821–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balon, E. K., 1975b. Ecological guilds of fishes: a short summary of the concept and its application. Verh. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. 19: 2430–2439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balon, E. K., 1981. Additions and amendments to the classification of reproductive styles in fishes. Environ. Biol. Fish. 6: 377–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayley, P. B. & H.W. Li, 1992. Riverine fishes. In Calow, P. & G. E. Petts (eds), The Rivers Handbook: Hydrological and Ecological Principles. Vol. 1. Blackwell, Oxford: 251–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergers, P. J. M., 1991. Voedselecologie van vissen in de Nederlandse Rijntakken. Publications and Reports of the Project Ecological Rehabilitation of the River Rhine 28: 1–119 (in Dutch, summary in English).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrebi dit Thomas, R., J. Belliard & P. Boët, 1998. Caractéristiques des peuplements piscicoles sensibles aux altérations du milieu dans les cours d'eau du bassin de la Seine. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic. 348: 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buijse, A. D., H. Coops, M. Staras, L. H. Jans, G. J. van Geest, R. E. Grift, B.W. Ibelings, W. Oosterberg & F. C. J. M. Roozen, 2002. Restoration strategies for river floodplains along large lowland rivers in Europe. Freshwat. Biol. 47: 889–907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chovanec, A., P. Jäger, M. Jungwirth, V. Koller-Kreimel, O. Moog, S. Muhar & S. Schmutz, 2000. The Austrian way of assessing the ecological integrity of running waters: a contribution to the EU Water Framework Directive. Hydrobiologia 422/423: 445–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copp, G. H., 1989. The habitat diversity and fish reproductive function of floodplain ecosystems. Environ. Biol. Fish. 26: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copp, G. H., J.-M. Olivier, M. Pe¡náz & A. L. Roux, 1991. Juvenile fishes as functional describers of fluvial ecosystem dynamics: applications on the River Rhône, France. Regul. Rivers: Res. Manage. 6: 135–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, S. J., 2002. A review of the past and present status of anadromous fish species in the Netherlands: is restocking the Rhine feasible? Hydrobiologia 478/Developments in Hydrobiology 166: 205–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Nie, H. W., 1996. Atlas van de Nederlandse Zoetwatervissen. Media Publishing, Doetinchem (in Dutch).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Nie, H. W., 1997. Bedreigde en Kwetsbare Zoetwatervissen in Nederland, Voorstel voor een Rode Lijst. Stichting Atlas Verspreiding Nederlandse Zoetwatervissen, Nieuwegein (in Dutch, summary in English).

  • De Nie, H. W., 1998. Beoordeling van de waterkwaliteit met vissen. In Anonymous (ed.), Cursus Waterkwaliteit. RUG Afdeling Biologie, Groningen: 132–150 (in Dutch)

  • De Nie, H. W. & G. Van Ommering, 1998. Bedreigde en Kwetsbare Zoetwatervissen in Nederland, Toelichting op de Rode Lijst. Informatie-en KennisCentrum Natuurbeheer, Wageningen (in Dutch, summary in English).

  • Dynesius, M. & C. Nilsson, 1994. Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world. Science 266: 753–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal L 327, 22/12/2000 P 0001. http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/consleg/main/2000/en_2000L006 0_index.html (4 March 2003)

  • EC-DG XI, 2003 The EU Water Framework Directive-integrated river basin management for Europe. http://europa.eu.int/comm/ environment/water/water-framework/index_en.html (4 March 2003).

  • Goldstein, R. M. & T. P. Simon, 1999. Toward a united definition of guild structure for feeding ecology of North American freshwater fishes. In Simon, T. P. (ed.), Assessing the Sustainability and Biological Integrity of Water Resources Using Fish Communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton: 123–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandmottet, J. P., 1983. Principales exigences des téléostéens vis-à-vis de l'habitat aquatique. Annales Scientifiques de l'Université de Franche-Comté, Besançon, Biologie Animale, 4ème série, fasc. 4: 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grift, R. E., 2001. How Fish Benefit from Floodplain Restoration along the Lower River Rhine. PhD Thesis. Wageningen University, Wageningen.

  • Grift, R. E., A. D. Buijse, W. L. T. van Densen & J. G. P. Klein Breteler, 2000. Restoration of the river-floodplain interaction: benefits for the fish community in the River Rhine. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 135, Large Rivers 12: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, H. A., 1975. River zonation and classification. In Whitton, B. A. (ed.), River Ecology. Blackwell, Oxford: 312–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hengeveld, R., 1996. Measuring ecological diversity. Biodivers. Lett. 3: 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holčík, J. (ed.), 1989. The Freshwater Fishes of Europe. Vol. 1, Part II. AULA-Verlag, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, R. J., 1978. Temporal variability patterns and the distributional patterns of stream fishes. Ecol. Monogr. 48: 307–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huet, M., 1949. Aperçu des relations entre la pente et les populations piscicoles des eaux courantes. Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 11: 333–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huet, M., 1959. Profiles and biology of Western European streams as related to fish management. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 88: 155–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huet, M., 1962. Influence du courant sur la distribution des poissons dans les eaux courantes. Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 24: 413–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illies, J. & L. Botosaneanu, 1963. Problèmes et méthodes de la classification et de la zonation écologique des eaux courantes, considerées surtout du point de vue faunistique. Verh. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. 12: 1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungwirth, M., S. Muhar & S. Schmutz, 1995. The effects of recreated instream and ecotone structures on the fish fauna of an epipotamal river. Hydrobiologia 303: 195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R., 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6: 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R., 1995. Using biological criteria to protect ecological health. In Rapport, D. J., C. L. Gaudet & P. Calow (eds), Evaluating and Monitoring the Health of Large-Scale Ecosystems. NATO ASI Series, Vol. I 28. Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, P., 1994. Poissons. InMaurin, H. (ed.), Inventaire de la Faune Menacée en France. Le Livre Rouge. Editions Nathan/Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle/WWF-France, Paris: 100–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhofer, A. & D. Hefti (eds), 1996. Conservation of Endangered Freshwater Fish in Europe. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelek, A., 1987. The Freshwater Fishes of Europe. Vol. 9: Threatened Fishes of Europe. AULA-Verlag, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelek, A., 1991. The predator–prey relationship in the fish community of the River Rhine. Verh. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. 24: 2455–2460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelek, A. & G. Buhse, 1992. Fische des Rheins: Früher und Heute. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelek, A. & C. Köhler, 1989. Zustandanalyse der Fischartengemeinschaften im Rhein (1987–1988). Fischökologie 1: 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenders, H. J. R., B. G.W. Aarts, H. Strijbosch & G. van der Velde, 1998. The role of reference and target images in ecological recovery of river systems: lines of thought in the Netherlands. In Nienhuis P. H., R. S. E. W. Leuven & A. M. J. Ragas (eds), New Concepts for Sustainable Management of River Basins. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden: 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenders, H. J. R., M. A. J. Huijbregts, B. G. W. Aarts & C. A. M. van Turnhout, 1999. Assessing the degree of preservation of landscape, natural and cultural-historical values in river dike reinforcement planning in The Netherlands. Regul. Rivers: Res. Manage. 15: 325–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuven, R. S. E. W., Y. Gerig, I. Poudevigne, G. W. Geerling, L. K. Kooistra & B. G. W. Aarts, 2002. Cumulative impact assessment of ecological rehabilitation and infrastructure facilities in floodplains along the middle reach of the River Waal. In Leuven, R. S. E. W., I. Poudevigne & R. M. Teeuw (eds), Application of Geographic Information Systems and Remote Sensing in River Studies. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden: 201–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz C.M., G.M. van Dijk, A. G. M. van Hattum, W. P. Cofino, 1997. Concepts in river ecology: implications for indicator development. Regul. Rivers: Res. Manage. 13: 501–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, R. & R. J. Naiman, 1990. The relation of stream order to fish community dynamics in boreal forest watersheds. Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol. 37: 135–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nienhuis P. H., A. D. Buijse, R. S. E. W. Leuven, A. J. M. Smits, R. J. W. De Nooij, E. M. Samborska, 2002. Ecological rehab-178 ilitation of the lowland basin of the river Rhine (NW Europe). Hydrobiologia 478/Developments in Hydrobiology 166: 53–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nienhuis, P. H. & R. S. E. W. Leuven, 2001. River restoration and flood protection: controversy or synergism? Hydrobiologia 444: 85–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberdorff, T. & R. M. Hughes, 1992. Modification of an index of biotic integrity based on fish assemblages to characterize rivers of the Seine Basin, France. Hydrobiologia 228: 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pe?áz, M. & P. Jurajda, 1993. Fish assemblages of the Morava River – Longitudinal zonation and protection. Folia Zool. 42: 317–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quak, J., 1994. De visstand in stromende wateren. In Raat, A. J. P. (ed.), Vismigratie, Visgeleiding en Vispassages in Nederland. Organisation for the Improvement of Inland Fisheries, Nieuwegein: 59–84 (in Dutch).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raat A. J. P., 2001. Ecological rehabilitation of the Dutch part of the River Rhine with special attention to the fish. Regul. Rivers: Res. Manage. 17: 131–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redeke, H. C., 1941. Fauna van Nederland X (Pisces). Sijthoff's, Leiden (in Dutch).

  • Schiemer, F., 1988. Gefärdete Cypriniden – Indikatoren für die ökologische Intaktheit von Flußsystemen. Natur und Landschaft 63: 370–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiemer, F. & T. Spindler, 1989. Endangered fish species of the Danube River in Austria. Regul. Rivers: Res. Manage. 4: 397–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiemer, F. & H. Waidbacher, 1992. Strategies for conservation of a Danubian fish fauna. In Boon, P. J., P. Calow & G. E. Petts (eds), River Conservation and Management. Wiley, Chichester: 363–382.

  • Schmutz, S., B. Kaufmann, B. Vogel, M. Jungwirth & S. Muhar, 2000. A multi-level concept for fish-based, river-type-specific assessment of ecological integrity. Hydrobiologia 422/423: 279–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schöll, F. & A. Haybach, 2000. Der Potamon-Typie-Index – ein indikatives Verfahren zur ökologischen Bewertung großer Fließgewässer. Hydrologie und Wasserbewirtschaftung 44: 32–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, W. J. & J. Quak, 1994. De Visstand in de Stromende Rijkswateren. RIZA/OVB VO 1993–01. Organisation for the Improvement of Inland Fisheries, Nieuwegein/Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment, Lelystad (in Dutch).

  • Siepel, H., R. J. Knijn, F. J. J. Niewold & H. J. L Heessen, 1993. De Internationale Betekenis van Nederland voor de Fauna; 2. De Aquatische Fauna. IBN-DLO, Wageningen (in Dutch).

  • Simberloff, D. & T. Dayan, 1991. The guild concept and the structure of ecological communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22: 115–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, T. P. (ed), 1999. Assessing the Sustainability and Biological Integrity of Water Resources Using Fish Communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tittizer, T. & F. Krebs (eds), 1996. Ökosystemforschung: Der Rhein und seine Auen – Eine Bilanz. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Brink, F. W. B., 1994. Impact of Hydrology on Floodplain Lake Ecosystems along the Lower Rhine and Meuse. PhD Thesis. University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Brink, F. W. B., G. van der Velde, A. D. Buijse & A. G. Klink, 1996. Biodiversity in the Lower Rhine and Meuse river-floodplains: its significance for ecological management. Neth. J. Aquat. Ecol. 30: 129–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Velde, G. & F. W. B. van den Brink, 1994. Does the Rhine still have characteristics of a river ecosystem? The longitudinal distribution of macroinvertebrates. Water Sci. Technol. 29: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell & C. E. Cushing, 1980. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 130–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verneaux, J., 1973. Cours d'Eau de Franche-Comté (Massif du Jura). Recherches Écologiques sur le Réseau Hydrographique du Doubs. Essai de Biotypologie. Thesis, University of Besançon.

  • Verneaux, J., 1981. Les poissons et la qualité des cours d'eau. Annales Scientifiques de l'Université de Franche-Comté, Besançon, Biologie Animale, 4ème série, fasc. 2: 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verneaux, J., A. Schmitt, V. Verneaux & C. Prouteau, 2003. Benthic insects and fish of the Doubs River system: typological traits and the development of a species continuum in a theoretically extrapolated watercourse. Hydrobiologia 490: 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volz, J. & W. G. Cazemier, 1991. Die Fischfauna im niederländischen Rhein – eine aktuelle Bestandsaufname. Fischökologie 5: 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vriese, F. T., S. Semmekrot & A. J. P. Raat, 1994. Assessment of spawning and nursery areas in the river Meuse. Water Sci. Technol. 29: 297–299.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Studies, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Bram G.W. Aarts & Piet H. Nienhuis

Authors
  1. Bram G.W. Aarts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Piet H. Nienhuis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aarts, B.G., Nienhuis, P.H. Fish zonations and guilds as the basis for assessment of ecological integrity of large rivers. Hydrobiologia 500, 157–178 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024638726162

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024638726162

Search

Navigation