Skip to main content
Log in

Quality Learning of Physics: Conceptions Held by High School and University Teachers

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports an exploration of the conceptions of quality learning held by two samples of physics teachers – final year, high school physics teachers and academics teaching first year university physics. We begin by outlining our view of quality learning, that is a view of learning in which learners take control of their own learning and engage with active construction and reconstruction of their own meanings for concepts and phenomena. This view of quality learning recognises the crucial role of the affective dimension of learning on the extent to which students engage with and maintain such constructivist and metacognitive approaches to learning. The study explored the qualitatively different ways in which individuals conceptualise quality learning in physics, using semi structured interviews that explored aspects of learning that the respondents regarded as worth fostering in their classrooms. The interview approach was a modification of the Interview-About-Instances approach that allowed the possibility of interviewees suggesting instances of particular relevance to their view of quality learning. This process resulted in a considerable quantity of rich and complex data related to a large range of aspects of physics learning. These data are summarised here, and the qualitatively different conceptions of the respondents with respect to four significant aspects of physics learning are discussed. These aspects are: doing experimental work; linking physics to the real world; students taking responsibility for their own learning and being confident/feeling proud of what you can do.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnott, N. (2000). Learning in engineering: Teacher as researcher in a tertiary context. Research in Science Education, 30, 317–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, J., McNaught, C., & Lueckenhausen, G. (1997, December). Relationship between academics' educational beliefs and conceptions and their design and use of computer software in higher education. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Association for Research on Education, Newcastle.

  • Baird, J. (1990). Metacognition, purposeful inquiry and conceptual change. In E. Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.), The student laboratory and the science curriculum (pp. 183–200). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J., Gunstone, R., Penna, C., Fensham, P., & White, R. (1990). Researching balance between cognition and affect in science teaching. Research in Science Education, 20, 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J. R., & Northfield, J. R. (Eds.). (1992). Learning from the PEEL experience. Melbourne, Australia: Faculty of Education, Monash University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batten, M., & Girling-Butcher, S. (1981). Perceptions of the quality of school life: A case study of schools and students. Hawthorn, Vic: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, J., & Gunstone, R. (2002). Metacognitive development as a shift in approach to learning: An in-depth study. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 459–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dall'Alba, G. (1990, July). Foreshadowing conceptions of teaching. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Higher Education Research and Development Society, Brisbane, Australia.

  • Gilbert, J. K., Watts, D. M., & Osborne, R. J. (1985). Eliciting student views using an interview-about-instances technique. In L. H. T. West & A. L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 11–27). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunstone, R. (1994). Metacognition and the importance of specific science content. In P. Fensham, R. Gunstone, & R. White (Eds.), The content of science (pp. 131– 146). London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunstone, R. F., & Baird, J. R. (1988). An integrative perspective on metacognition. Australian Journal of Reading, 11, 238–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, C. (1995). Access and the quality of learning: The story of a curriculum document for school physics. Unpublished PhD thesis, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, C. (2001). Examining relations of power in a process of curriculum change: The case of VCE physics. Research in Science Education, 31, 525–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, P.W., & Hewson, M. G. (1987). Science teachers' conceptions of teaching: Implications for teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 9, 425–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (1993). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, C., & Marshall, D. (1997). Introducing and evaluating metacognitive strategies in large-class introductory physics teaching. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning: Improving students as learners (pp. 107–117). Oxford, UK: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macleod, J., Brass, C., Fensham, P., Gunstone, R., & White, R. (1991). Quality learning in science: An annotated bibliography. Unpublished manuscript, Monash University,Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography-describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northfield, J. R., & Winter, R. (1993). Lessons for all.Melbourne,Australia: A Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nott, M., & Wellington, J. (1996). Probing teachers' views of the nature of science: how should we do it and where should we be looking? In G. Welford, J. Osborne, & P. Scott (Eds.), Science education research in Europe (pp. 283–293). London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (1979). Investigating student understanding of basic physics concepts using an interview-about-instances technique. Research in Science Education, 9, 85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penna, C., Baird, J., White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1992, July). A survey of components of challenge and outcome in science learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Hamilton, New Zealand.

  • Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., & Taylor, P. (1994). A phenomenographic study of academics' conceptions of science learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 4, 217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speering, W., & Rennie, L. (1996,April). Transition to secondary school: The impact of curriculum change on students' attitudes to science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.

  • Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. J. (1996). Cultural myths as constraints to the enacted science curriculum. Science Education, 80, 223–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., McRobbie, C. J., & Anderson, D. (1997). Dialectical constraints to the discursive practices of a high school physics community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 491–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1997). Towards an understanding of individual acts of teaching and learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 16, 241– 252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. (1977). The flying circus of physics (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. T. (1988). Learning science. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. T. (1994, April). A view of quality learning. Paper presented at the symposium “Understanding and fostering quality learning” at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

  • White, R. T., & Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Probing understanding. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brass, C., Gunstone, R. & Fensham, P. Quality Learning of Physics: Conceptions Held by High School and University Teachers. Research in Science Education 33, 245–271 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025038314119

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025038314119

Navigation