Skip to main content
Log in

Adoptee Dissimilarity from the Adoptive Family: Clinical Practice and Research Implications

  • Published:
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A review of theoretical, clinical, and empirical literature was conducted regarding the effect of adoptee dissimilarity from the adoptive family. There is empirical evidence of a relationship between dissimilarity and searching for birth parents, satisfaction with the adoption, and adjustment. A theory of an effect of identity-seeking on searching by adoptees has also been formulated. It is suggested, therefore, that an effort to establish one's identity may mediate a relationship between adoptee dissimilarity and searching. Implications are presented for social work practice and research, and for public policy and education, in instances of same race and transracial adoption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abend, S. M. (1974). Problems of identity: Theoretical and clinical applications. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 43, 606–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abend, S. M. (1995). Identity. In B. E. Moore, & B. D. Fine (Eds.), Psychoanalysis: The major concepts (pp. 471–474). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auth, P. J., & Zaret, S. (1986). The search in adoption: A service and a process. Social Casework, 67, 560–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholet, E. (1991). Where do Black children belong? The politics of race matching in adoption. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 139, 1163–1256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, M. (1991). The practice of open adoption: Findings from a study of 1396 adoptive families. Children and Youth Services Review, 13, 379–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle: Selected papers by Erik H. Erikson: Vol. 1. Psychological Issues. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigelman, W., & Silverman, A. R. (1983). Chosen children: New patterns of adoptive relationships. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonyo, B., & Watson, K. W. (1988). Searching in adoption. Public Welfare, Winter, 14–22.

  • Grotevant, H. (1997). Coming to terms with adoption: The construction of identity from adolescence into adulthood. Adoption Quarterly, 1, 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1969). Identity and difference. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, J., Berger, M., Melzak, S., Oldeschulte, R., Rabb, S., & Salo, F. (1984). Two crucial questions: Adopted children in psychoanalytic treatment. Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 10, 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowal, K. A., & Schilling, K. M. (1985). Adoption through the eyes of adult adoptees. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 55, 354–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeVine, E. S. & Sallee, A. L. (1990). Critical phases among adoptees and their families: Implications for therapy. Child and Adolescent Social Work, 7, 217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, K. (1997). The dilemma of adoption reunion: Establishing open communication between adoptees and their birth mothers. Family Relations, 46, 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 551–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offer, D. (1969). The psychological world of the teenager: A study of normal adolescent boys. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offer, D., Ostrov, E., & Howard, K. I. (1981). The adolescent: A psychological self-portrait. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco, F., & Eme, R. (1993). An outcome study of the reunion between adoptees and biological parents. Child Welfare, 72, 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preserving African-American families: Position Statement. (1994). Detroit, MI: National Association of Black Social Workers.

  • Raynor, L. (1980). The adopted child comes of age. London: George Allen and UNWIN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachdev, P. (1992). Adoption reunion and after: A study of the search process and experience of adoptees. Child Welfare, 71, 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sants, H. J. (1964). Genealogical bewilderment in children with substitute parents. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 37, 133–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schechter, M. D., & Bertocci, D. (1990). The meaning of the search. In D. M. Brodzinsky, & M. D. Schechter (Eds.), The psychology of adoption (pp. 62–90). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherick, I. (1983). Adoption and disturbed narcissism: A case illustration of a latency boy. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 31, 487–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobol, M. P., & Cardiff, J. (1983). A sociopsychological investigation of adult adoptees' search for birth parents. Family Relations, 32, 477–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorosky, A. D., Baran, A., & Pannor, R. (1984). The adoption triangle. San Antonio, TX: Corona Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, L. M., & Hoopes, J. L. (1985). Identity formation in the adopted adolescent. New York: Child Welfare League of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, F. H. (1972). Adoption and identity. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 3, 120–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triiseliotis, J. (1973). In search of origins: The experiences of adopted people. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, R. C., & Midford, S. M. (1986). Biological identity in adoption, artificial insemination by donor (A.I.D.) and the new birth technologies. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 11, 43–48.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hollingsworth, L.D. Adoptee Dissimilarity from the Adoptive Family: Clinical Practice and Research Implications. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal 15, 303–319 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025163912090

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025163912090

Keywords

Navigation