Skip to main content
Log in

Gender-Related Stereotypes of Transformational and Transactional Leadership

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated gender differences in transformational and transactional leadership, and gender-related stereotypes for these forms of leadership. Results indicated that there were no differences in the way the primarily Caucasian subordinates evaluated their actual male and female managers. There were, however, differences in ratings of stereotypic male versus stereotypic female leaders on transformational and transactional leadership, but only by female respondents. Finally, congruence between ratings of actual managers and ratings of stereotypic managers was found primarily for male respondents. Results suggest that stereotypes may be one explanation for gender differences found in prior research on transformational and transactional leadership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bass, B. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B., & Avolio, B. (1991). The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (Form 5X). Center for Leadership Studies, State University of New York at Binghamton.

  • Bass, B., & Avolio, B. (1992). The transformational and transactional leadership behavior of management women and men as described by the men and women who directly report to them. Paper presented at the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Conference, Montreal, Canada.

  • Bass, B., & Avolio, B. (1993). Transformational leadership: A response to critiques. In M. Chemers and R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, O., Tomkiewicz, J., & Schein, V. (1989). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics revisited. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 662-669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J., & Fazio, R. (1980). Expectancy confirmation process arising in the social interaction sequence. American Psychologist, 35, 867-881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369-389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druskat, V. (1994). Gender and leadership style: Transformational and transactional leadership in the Roman Catholic Church. Leadership Quarterly, 5, 99-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A., & Johnson, B. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233-256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A., Makhijani, M., & Klonsky, B. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M., Block, C., Martell, R., & Simon, M. (1989). Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 935-942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J., & Avolio, B. (1993). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control, and support for innovation: Key predictors of consolidated-business-unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 891-902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J., & Higgins, C. (1990). Champions of technological innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 317-341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komives, S. (1991a). The relationship of same-and cross-gender work pairs to staff performance and supervisor leadership in residence hall units. Sex Roles, 24, 355-363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komives, S. (1991b). Gender differences in the relationship of hall directors' transformational and transactional leadership and achieving styles. Journal of College Student Development, 32, 155-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman-Blumen, J. (1996). The connective edge: Leading in an interdependent world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R., & Maher, K. (1990). Leadership perceptions and leadership performance: Two distinct but interdependent processes. In J. Carroll (Ed.), Applied social psychology and organizational settings. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J., & Lord, R. (1986). Notes on the practical and theoretical consequences of implicit leadership theories for the future of leadership measurement. Journal of Management, 12, 31-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rush, M., Thomas, J., & Lord, R. (1977). Implicit leadership theory: A potential threat to the internal validity of leader behavior questionnaires. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20, 93-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J., Rush, M., & Herd, A. (1988). An exploration of women's expectations of effective male and female leadership. Sex Roles, 18, 279-287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, J., & Bass, B. (1990). Transformational leadership: Beyond consideration and initiating structure. Journal of Management, 16, 693-703.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Labor (1992). Pipelines of progress: A status report on the glass ceiling. U.S. Department of Labor.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maher, K.J. Gender-Related Stereotypes of Transformational and Transactional Leadership. Sex Roles 37, 209–225 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025647811219

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025647811219

Keywords

Navigation