Skip to main content
Log in

A New Method for Self-Regulation of Slow Cortical Potentials in a Timed Paradigm

  • Published:
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new method of slow cortical potential (SCP) biofeedback is described, in which subjects were presented with a sequence of two alternating tones. Subjects learned to adjust their SCPs with the 4-s rhythm of presented tones by producing directed SCP changes only in certain inter-tone intervals. Specifically, they learned to simultaneously produce two EEG signals: 1) positive or negative SCP shift at vertex, and 2) SCP asymmetry between the right and the left central area. After one training session, 13 healthy participants were able to differentiate significantly between the negativity and the positivity conditions; this differentiation was achieved within less than 300 ms after the discriminative signal, i.e. much faster than in previous studies employing traditional SCP biofeedback technique. However, these participants did not produce a significant hemispheric asymmetry in the first session. In the second experiment, five subjects participated in prolonged training (6 to 17 sessions). Highly significant control of SCP asymmetry over the precentral cortex was attained in four out of five participants. Advantages and disadvantages of the new method as compared with the “classical” SCP biofeedback technique are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Barrett H. R., & Pettaway G. T. (1986). Biofeedback-assisted control of peripheral skin temperature: a methodological study. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 63(2), 631–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett H. R., Streets T. M., Tucker J. H., & Pettaway G. T. (1987). Skin temperature biofeedback for multiple sessions with monetary incentives. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 65(1), 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birbaumer N., Elbert T., Rockstroh B., & Lutzenberger W. (1981). Biofeedback of event-related potentials of the brain. International Journal of Psychology, 16, 389–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birbaumer N., Lang P. J., Cook E., III, Elbert T., Lutzenberger W., & Rockstroh B. (1988). Slow brain potentials, imagery and hemispheric differences. International Journal of Neuroscience, 39, 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bregman N. J., & McAllister H. A. (1982). Motivation and skin temperature biofeedback: Yerkes-Dodson revisited. Psychophysiology, 19, 282–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbert T., Roberts L. E., Lutzenberger W., & Birbaumer N. (1980). Biofeedback of slow cortical potentials. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 48, 293–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gratton G., Coles M. G. H., & Donchin E. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifacts. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston D. W., & Lethem J. (1983). Feedback and incentive effects on the decrease of interbeat interval. Biofeedback & Self-Regulation, 8(2), 255–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo C. Y., Travis T. A., & Knott J. R. (1975). The effects of changes in motivation on alpha enhancement. Psychophysiology, 12, 388–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornhuber H. H., & Deecke L. (1965). Hirnpotentialänderungen bei Willkürbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des Menschen: Bereitschaftspotential und reafferente Potentiale. Pflügers Archiv ges. Physiologic, 284, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang P. J., & Twentyman C. T. (1976). Learning to control heart rate: Effects of varying incentive and criterion of success on task performance. Psychophysiology, 13, 378–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lao R. C. (1981). Effect of monetary reward on subsequent motivation. Journal of Psychology, 107, 41–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockstroh B., Birbaumer N., Elbert T., & Lutzenberger W. (1984). Operant control of EEG and event-related potentials and slow brain potentials. Biofeedback & Self-Regulation, 9, 139–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockstroh B., Elbert T., Canavan A., Lutzenberger W., & Birbaumer N. (1989). Slow cortical potentials and behavior. Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockstroh B., Elbert T., Birbaumer N., & Lutzenberger W. (1990). Biofeedback-produced hemispheric asymmetry of slow cortical potentials and its behavioural effects. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 9, 151–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld J. P., Cha G., Blair T., & Gotlib I. H. (1995). Operant (biofeedback) control of left-right frontal alpha power differences: Potential neurotherapy for affective disorders. Biofeedback & Self-Regulation, 20, 241–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley C. F. (1989). Biofeedback training versus simple instructions to reduce heart rate reactivity to a psychological stressor. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 12, 435–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter W. G., Cooper R., Aldridge, V., McCallum W. C., & Winter A. L. (1964). Contingent negative variation: An electrical sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature, 203, 380–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpaw J. R., & McFarland D. J. (1994). Multichannel EEG-based brain-computer communication. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 90, 444–449.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kotchoubey, B., Schleichert, H., Lutzenberger, W. et al. A New Method for Self-Regulation of Slow Cortical Potentials in a Timed Paradigm. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 22, 77–93 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026272127923

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026272127923

Navigation