Skip to main content
Log in

How Deep is the Surface? A Theoretical Framework for Understanding Meaning-Making in Living Systems

  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Living systems are characterized by unique properties that make them resistant to the ``information-processingperspective'' of traditional cognitive science.This paper details those unique properties andoffers a new theoretical framework forunderstanding the behavior of living systems.This framework leans heavily on ideas fromgeneral systems theory (specifically Bateson'sinteractionist perspective), semiotics, andMerleau-Ponty's phenomenology. The benefits ofusing this framework are illustrated withexamples from two different domains: immunologyand verbal interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bateson, G.: 2000, Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, I.R.: 1994, Kadishman's Tree, Escher's Angels, and the Immunological Homunculus. In A. Coutinho and M. D. Kazatchkine (eds.), Autoimmunity: Physiology and Disease. Wiley-Liss, Inc., 7–18.

  • Cohen, I.R.: 2000, Tending Adam's Garden: Evolving the Cognitive Immune Self. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, I.R.: 2001, The Creation of Immune Specificity. In L.A. Segel and I.R. Cohen (eds.), Design Principles for the Immune System and other Distributed Autonomous Systems. A volume in the Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colapietro, V.M. (ed.): 1993, Glossary of Semiotics. New York: Paragon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danesi, M.: 2001, Layering Theory and Human Abstract Thinking. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 8: 5–25. [Special issue: New Directions in Cybersemiotics.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy, J.P.: 2000, The Mechanization of the Mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy, J.P. and F. Varela: 1992, Understanding Origins: An Introduction. In F. Varela and J.P. Dupuy (eds.), Understanding Origins. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelberg, J.: 2001, On the Two-Dimensional Nature of Human Organism. Unpublished manuscript. Office of Integrative Studies, University of Kentucky College of Medicine.

  • Harries-Jones, P.: 1995, A Recursive Vision: Ecological Understanding and Gregory Bateson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harries-Jones, P.: 2002, Where Bonds Become Binds: The Necessity for Bateson's Interactive Perspective in Biosemiotics. Sign Systems Studies 30: 163–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harries-Jones,P.: in press, Re-Generating Environment: The Logic of Moving Boundaries. In J.-G. Vaillancourt and P. Hamel (eds.), Re-Embedding the Economy in Nature and Society: A Polanyian Approach to the Environment Montreal: Black Rose Books.

  • Jenny, H.: 1974, Kymatik. Basel: Bislius Presse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempe, B.: 1886, A Memoir on the Theory of Mathematical Form. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 177: 1–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H., J. Mpodozis and J.C. Letelier: 1995, Brain, Language and the Origin of Human Mental Functions. Biological Research 28: 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M.: 1962, Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. and S. Buvac: 1997, Formalizing Context. In A. Aliseda, R. van Glabbeek and D. Westerstahl (eds.), Computing Natural Language. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 13–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, Y.: 2001, Existing as a ‘Difference that Makes a Difference': On Cybernetics, Semiotics and Being. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 8: 25–35. [Special issue: New Directions in Cybersemiotics.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, Y.: 2002, A Co-Generic Perspective for Problems Involving a Shift Between Systems’ Different Levels of Analysis. International Journal of General Systems 31: 111–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, Y.: 2003, Co-Generic Logic as a Theoretical Framework for the Analysis of Communication in Living Systems. Semiotica 144: 49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, Y.: in press a, Turtles All the Way Down: Outlines for a Dynamic Theory of Epistemology. Systems Research and Behavioral Science.

  • Neuman, Y.: in press b, Processes and Boundaries of the Mind: Extending the Limit Line. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers [The Contemporary Systems Thinking Series].

  • Polanyi, M.: 1968, Life's Irreducible Structure. Science 160: 1308–1312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T.A. (ed.).: 1984, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Semiotics. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T.A. and M. Danesi: 2000, Forms of Meaning. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanon, B.: 1991, Representation–Senses and Reason. Philosophical Psychology 4: 355–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukman, A. (ed.).: 1983, Bakhtin School Papers. Oxford: RPT Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer-Brown, G.: 1994, Laws of Form. Portland, OR: Cognizer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F.: 1992, Whence Perceptual Meaning? A Cartography of Current Ideas. In F. Varela and J.P. Dupuy (eds.), Understanding Origins. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 235–265.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neuman, Y. How Deep is the Surface? A Theoretical Framework for Understanding Meaning-Making in Living Systems. Foundations of Science 8, 393–415 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026371128677

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026371128677

Navigation