Skip to main content
Log in

Generation of Chromosome Painting Probes from Single Chromosomes by Laser Microdissection and Linker-Adaptor PCR

  • Published:
Chromosome Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) plays an essential role in research and clinical diagnostics. The versatility and resolution of FISH depends critically on the probe set used. Here, we describe an improved approach for the generation of specific DNA probes from single copies of chromosomes. Single chromosomes or single chromosomal regions were microdissected by laser pressure catapulting and amplified using linker-adaptor PCR. The probes were labeled and tested in various scenarios including multicolor-FISH experiments employing up to seven different fluorochromes. FISH confirmed the specific and even staining of the respective chromosomal regions. Furthermore, the capability of these probes to detect even small translocations (<3 Mb) suggests that the dissected regions are completely represented in the generated painting probes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azofeifa J, Fauth C, Kraus J et al. (2000) An optimized probe set for the detection of small interchromosomal aberrations by use of 24-color FISH. Am J Hum Genet 66: 1684–1688.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carter NP, Ferguson-Smith MA, Perryman MT et al. (1992) Reverse chromosome painting: a method for the rapid analysis of aberrant chromosomes in clinical cytogenetics. J Med Genet 29: 299–307.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deng HX, Yoshiura K, Dirks RW et al. (1992) Chromosome-band-specific painting: chromosome in situ suppression hybridization using PCR products from a microdissected chromosome band as a probe pool. Hum Genet 89: 13–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greulich KO, Leitz G (1994) Light as microsensor and micromanipulator: laser microbeams and optical tweezers. Exp Techn Phys 40: 1–14.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gribble S, Ng BL, Prigmore E et al. (2004) Chromosome paints from single copies of chromosomes. Chromosome Res 12: 143–151.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guan XY, Meltzer PS, Trent JM (1994) Rapid generation of whole chromosome painting probes (WCPs) by chromosome microdissection. Genomics 22: 101–107.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klein CA, Schmidt-Kittler O, Schardt JA et al. (1999) Comparative genomic hybridization, loss of heterozygosity, and DNA sequence analysis of single cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 4494–4499.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kubickova S, Cernohorska H, Musilova P et al. (2002) The use of laser microdissection for the preparation of chromosome-specific painting probes in farm animals. Chromosome Res 10: 571–577.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Langer S, Kraus J, Jentsch I et al. (2004) Multicolor chromosome painting in diagnostic and research applications. Chromosome Res 12: 14–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lengauer C, Eckelt A, Weith A et al. (1991) Painting of defined chromosomal regions by in situ suppression hybridization of libraries from laser-microdissected chromosomes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 56: 27–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer PS, Guan XY, Burgess A et al. (1992) Rapid generation of region specific probes by chromosome microdissection and their application. Nat Genet 1: 24–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Navia J, Nebel A, Schleiermacher E. (1995) Complete and precise characterization of marker chromosomes by application of microdissection in prenatal diagnosis. Hum Genet 96: 661–667.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schermelleh L, Thalhammer S, Cremer T et al. (1999) Laser microdissection and laser pressure catapulting as an approach for the generation of chromosome specific paint probes. BioTechniques Int 27: 362–367.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders AM, Nowak N, Segraves R et al. (2001) Assembly of microarrays for genome-wide measurement of DNA copy number. Nat Genet 29: 263–264.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Telenius H, Pelmear A, Tunnacliffe A et al. (1992) Cytogenetic analysis by chromsome painting using DOP-PCR amplified flow-sorted chromosomes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 4: 257–263.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thalhammer S, Lahr G, Clement-Sengewald A et al. (2003) Laser microtools in cell biology and molecular medicine. J Laser Phys 13: 681–692.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weimer J, Koehler MR, Wiedemann U et al. (2001) Highly comprehensive karyotype analysis by a combination of spectral karyotyping (SKY), microdissection, and reverse painting (SKY-MD). Chromosome Res 9: 395–402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wienberg J, Jauch A, Lüdecke HJ et al. (1994) The origin of human chromosome 2 analyzed by comparative chromosome mapping with a DNA microlibrary. Chromosome Res 2: 405–410.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thalhammer, S., Langer, S., Speicher, M.R. et al. Generation of Chromosome Painting Probes from Single Chromosomes by Laser Microdissection and Linker-Adaptor PCR. Chromosome Res 12, 337–343 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CHRO.0000034132.77192.5f

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CHRO.0000034132.77192.5f

Navigation