Abstract
Discussions concerning belief revision, theorydevelopment, and ``creativity'' in philosophy andAI, reveal a growing interest in Peirce'sconcept of abduction. Peirce introducedabduction in an attempt to providetheoretical dignity and clarification to thedifficult problem of knowledge generation. Hewrote that ``An Abduction is Originary inrespect to being the only kind of argumentwhich starts a new idea'' (Peirce, CP 2.26).These discussions, however, led to considerabledebates about the precise way in which Peirce'sabduction can be used to explain knowledgegeneration (cf. Magnani, 1999; Hoffmann, 1999).The crucial question is that of understandinghow we can get the new elements capableof enlarging our theories. Under thesecircumstances, it might be helpful to step outof the entanglement and reconsider the basis ofthe problem that originally triggered Peirce'sinterest in abduction. This will lead us toanother Peircean concept, that of ``diagrammaticreasoning,'' which I discuss here in the contextof his ``pragmatism.'' In this way, I hope toreach a better understanding of thecontribution of ``abduction'' to the knowledgegeneration process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Almeder, R.: 1989, Peircean Scientific Realism, History of Philosophy Quarterly6: 357–364.
Aristotle: 1994[1975], An. Post.,Posterior Analytics. Transl. With a Commentaryby Jonathan Barnes. Oxford: Clarendon.
Boler, J.F.: 1963, Charles Peirce and Scholastic Realism-A Study of Peirce's Relation to John Duns Scotus. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
De Regt, H.C.D.G.: 1999, Peirce's Pragmatism, Scientific Realism, and the Problem of Underdetermination, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society35: 374–397.
Eisele, C.: 1987, Peirce's Pragmaticism. In H. Stachowiak (ed.), Pragmatics.Handbook of Pragmatic Thought. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 84–97.
Hacking, I.: 1983, Representing and Intervening. Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haack, S.: 1992, “Extreme Scholastic Realism”: Its Relevance to Philosophy of Science Today, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society28: 19–50.
Haack, S., 1993, Evidence and Inquiry. Towards Reconstruction in Epistemology. Oxford/Cambridge: Blackwell.
Hausman, C.R.: 1993, Charles S. Peirce's Evolutionary Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hempel, C.G.: 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: The Free Press.
Hintikka, J.: 1983[1980], C.S. Peirce's 'First Real Discovery' and Its Contemporary Relevance. In E. Freeman (ed.), The Relevance of Charles Peirce. La Salle, IL: Hegeler Institut, 107–118.
Hoffmann, M.H.G.: 1999, Problems with Peirce's Concept of Abduction, Foundations of Science4: 271–305.
Hoffmann, M.H.G.: 2000, Is There a 'Logic' of Abduction? In A. Gimate-Welsh (ed.), Ensayos Semióticos. Dominios, modelos y miradas desde el cruce dela naturaleza y la cultura[=Selected papers-6th Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies, Guadalajara 1997]. Mexico City, 617–628. Online: http://www.uni-bielefeld.de/idm/personen/mhoffman/papers/ abduction-logic.html.
Hoffmann, M.H.G.: 2001, The 1903 Classification of Triadic Sign-Relations. In J. Queiroz (ed.), Digital Encyclopedia of Charles S. Peirce. Online: http://www.digitalpeirce.org/hoffmann/sighof.htm.
Hoffmann, M.H.G.: 2003, Peirce's “Diagrammatic Reasoning” as a Solution of the Learning Paradox. In G. Debrock (ed.), Process Pragmatism: Essays on a Quiet Philosophical Revolution. Amsterdam: Rodopi Press, 121–143.
Huggett, N. (ed.): 1999, Space from Zeno to Einstein: Classic Readings With a Contemporary Commentary. Cambridge MA/London: MIT Press.
Hull, K.: 1994, Why Hanker After Logic? Mathematical Imagination, Creativity and Perception in Peirce's Systematic Philosophy, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society30: 271–295.
Joswick, H.: 1988, Peirce's Mathematical Model of Interpretation, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society24: 107–121.
Kant, I.: CPR, Critique of Pure Reason. Houndmills UK: Macmillan Press. Online: http://www.arts.cuhk.edu.hk/Philosophy/Kant/cpr/cpr-open.html.
Kent, B.: 1997, The Interconnectedness of Peirce's Diagrammatic Thought. In N. Houser, D.D. Roberts and J. Van Evra (eds.), Studies in the Logic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 445–459.
Magnani, L.: 1999, Model-Based Creative Abduction. In L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian and P. Thagard (eds.), Model-based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. New York: Plenum Publishers, 219–238.
McDowell, J.: 1994,Mind andWorld. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.
Murphey, M.G.: 1993[1961], The Development of Peirce's Philosophy. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
Norton, B.G.: 2002, A Pragmatist Epistemology for Adaptive Management. In J. Keulartz et al. (eds.), Pragmatist Ethics for a Technological Culture. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Peirce: CP, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press (quotations according to volume and paragraph).
Peirce: 1992, 1998, EP, The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings.Vol. 1 (1867–1893),Vol. 2 (1893-1913).Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Peirce: 1976, NEM, The New Elements of Mathematics by Charles S. Peirce. The Hague-Paris/Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Mouton/Humanities Press.
Plato: 1900ff., Tht., Theaetetus. In I. Burnet (ed.), Platonis Opera, Vol. I. Oxford, 142–210.
Putnam, H.: 1987, The Many Faces of Realism. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Putnam, H.: 1988, Representation and Reality. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.
Putnam, H., 1992, Renewing Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Shin, S.-J.: 1997, Kant's Syntheticity Revisited by Peirce, Synthese113: 1–41.
Stjernfelt, F.: 2000, Diagrams as Centerpiece of a Peircean Epistemology, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society36: 357–384.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoffmann, M.H. How to Get It. Diagrammatic Reasoning as a Tool of Knowledge Development and its Pragmatic Dimension. Foundations of Science 9, 285–305 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FODA.0000042844.22765.55
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FODA.0000042844.22765.55