Skip to main content
Log in

Locality and Measurements Within the SR Model for an Objective Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the authors has recently propounded an SR (semantic realism) model which shows, circumventing known no-go theorems, that an objective (noncontextual, hence local) interpretation of quantum mechanics (QM) is possible. We consider here compound physical systems and show why the proofs of nonlocality of QM do not hold within the SR model, which is slightly simplified in this paper. We also discuss quantum measurement theory within this model, note that the objectification problem disappears since the measurement of any property simply reveals its unknown value, and show that the projection postulate can be considered as an approximate law, valid FAPP (for all practical purposes). Finally, we provide an intuitive picture that justifies some unusual features of the SR model and proves its consistency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. Garola, "A simple model for an objective interpretation of quantum mechanics," Found. Phys. 32, 1597-1615 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Garola, "Classical foundations of quantum logic," Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 30, 1-52 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Garola and L. Solombrino, "The theoretical apparatus of Semantic Realism: A new language for classical and quantum physics," Found. Phys. 26, 1121-1164 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Garola and L. Solombrino, "Semantic Realism versus EPR-like paradoxes: The Furry, Bohm–Aharonov, and Bell paradoxes," Found. Phys. 26, 1329-1356 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Garola, "Objectivity versus nonobjectivity in quantum mechanics," Found. Phys. 30, 1539-1565 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. G. Beltrametti and G. Cassinelli, The Logic of Quantum Mechanics (Addison–Wesley, Reading, MA, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. Selleri, "History of the Einstein–Podolski–Rosen paradox," in Quantum Mechanics versus Local Realism, F. Selleri, (ed.) (Plenum, New York, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Einstein, B. Podolski, and N. Rosen, "Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?," Phys. Rev. 47, 777-780 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Bohm, Quantum Theory (Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. F. Clauser and M. A. Home, "Experimental consequences of objective local theories," Phys. Rev. D 10, 526-535 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. S. Bell, "On the Einstein–Podolski–Rosen paradox," Physics 1, 195-200 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Redhead, Incompleteness, Nonlocality, and Realism (Clarendon, Oxford, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. P. Wigner, "On hidden variables and quantum mechanical probabilities," Amer. J. Phys. 38, 1005-1009 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. J. Sakurai, Modern Quantum Mechanics (Benjamin, Reading, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. F. Clauser, M. A. Home, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, "Proposed experiment to test local hidden variables theories," Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880-884 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Home, A. Shimony, and A. Zeilinger, "Bell's theorem without inequalities," Amer. J. Phys. 58, 1131-1143 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  17. N. D. Mermin, "Hidden variables and the two theorems of John Bell," Rev. Modern Phys. 65, 803-815 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. Garola, "Reconciling local realism and quantum physics: A critique to Bell," Theoret. Mathem. Phys. 99, 285-291 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. Garola, "Criticizing Bell: Local realism and quantum physics reconciled," Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 34, 253-263 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. Garola, "Questioning nonlocality: An operational critique to Bell's theorem," in The Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Historical Analysis and Open Questions, C. Garola and A. Rossi, (eds.) (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. Garola, "Essay review: Waves, information, and foundations of physics," Stud. Hist. Philos. Modern Phys. 33, 101-116 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. Kochen and E. P. Specker, "The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics," in The Logico-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics, C. A. Hooker, (ed.) (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Aspect, "Experimental tests of Bell's inequalities with correlated photons," in Waves, Information, and Foundations of Physics, R. Pratesi and L. Ronchi, (eds.) (Editrice Compositori, Bologna, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. Garola, "Semantic realism: A new philosophy for quantum physics," Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 38, 3241-3252 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. Z. Albert, Quantum Mechanics and Experience (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  26. B. D'Espagnat, Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Benjamin, Reading, MA, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  27. C. Garola, "Embedding quantum mechanics into an objective framework," Found. Phys. Lett. 16, 605-612 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudio Garola.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garola, C., Pykacz, J. Locality and Measurements Within the SR Model for an Objective Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Foundations of Physics 34, 449–475 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FOOP.0000019623.41496.fc

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FOOP.0000019623.41496.fc

Navigation