Skip to main content
Log in

A Geometric Terrain Methodology for Global Optimization

  • Published:
Journal of Global Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Global optimization remains an important area of active research. Many macroscopic and microscopic applications in science and engineering still present formidable challenges to current global optimization techniques. In this work, a completely different, novel and general geometric framework for continuous global optimization is described. The proposed methodology is based on intelligent movement along the valleys and ridges of an appropriate objective function using downhill, local minimization calculations defined in terms of a trust region method and uphill integration of the Newton-like vector field combined with intermittent SQP corrector steps. The novel features of the proposed methodology include new rigorous mathematical definitions of valleys and ridges, the combined use of objective function and gradient surfaces to guide movement, and techniques to assist both exploration and termination. Collisions with boundaries of the feasible region, integral curve bifurcations, and the presence of non-differentiabilities are also discussed. A variety of examples are used to make key concepts clear and to demonstrate the reliability, efficiency and robustness of terrain methods for global optimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aluf-Pentini, F., Parisi, V. and Zirilli, F. (1985), Global optimization and stochastic differential equations, J.Opt.Theory and Appl.47, 1-15.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bahren, J. and Protopopescu, V. (1996), Generalized TRUST algorithms for global optimiza-tion, In State of the Art in Global Optimization, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp.163-180.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baker, J. (1986), An algorithm for the location of transition states, J.Comput.Chem.7, 385-395.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bilbro, G.L. (1994), Fast stochastic global optimization, IEEE Trans.Syst.Man.Cyber.SMC-24 4, 684-689.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bolhius, P.G., Chandler, D., Dellago, C. and Geissler, P.L. (2002), Transition path sampling: Throwing ropes over rough mountain passes, in the dark, Annu.Rev.Phys.Chem.53, 291-318.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hansen, E.R. (1980), Global optimization using interval analysis-the multidimensional case, Numer.Math.34, 247-270.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Henkelman, G., Johannesson, G. and Jonsson, H. (2000), Methods for nding saddle points and minimum energy paths, In:Progress in Theoretical Chemistry and Physics, 5, pp.269-300, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Levy, A.V. and Montalvo, A. (1985), The tunneling algorithm for the global minimization of functions, SIAM J.Sci. and Stat.Comp.6, 15-29.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lucia, A. and Yang, F. (2002), Global terrain methods, Comput.Chem.Engng.26, 529-546.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lucia, A. and Yang, F. (2003), Multivariable terrain methods, AIChE J.in press.

  11. Maranas, C.D. and Floudas, C.A. (1995), Finding all solutions to nonlinearly constrained systems of equations, J.Global Optim.7, 143-153.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Michelsen, M.L. (1982), The isothermal.ash problem.Part 1.stability, Fluid Phase Equil.9, 1-19.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Muller, K. and Brown, L.D. (1979), Location of saddle points and minimum energy paths by a constrained simplex optimization procedure, Theoret.Chim.Acta, 53, 75-93.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Prausnitz, J.M., Anderson, T.F., Grens, E.A., Eckert, C.A., Hsieh, R. and O'Connell, J.P. (1980), Computer Calculations for Multicomponent Vapor-Liquid and Liquid-Liquid Equilib-ria, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schnepper, C.A. and Stadtherr, M.A. (1995), Robust process simulation using interval methods, Comput.Chem.Engng.20, 187-199.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sevick, E.M., Bell, A.T. and Theodorou, D.N. (1993), A chain of states method for investigating infrequent event processes occurring in multistate, multidimensional systems, J.Chem.Phys. 98, 3196-3212.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Westerberg, K.M. and Floudas, C.A. (1999), Locating all transition states and studying the reaction pathways of potential energy functions, J.Chem.Phys.110, 9259-9295.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lucia, A., Dimaggio, P. & Depa, P. A Geometric Terrain Methodology for Global Optimization. Journal of Global Optimization 29, 297–314 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOGO.0000044771.25100.2d

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOGO.0000044771.25100.2d

Navigation