REFERENCES
Aristotle: 1991, On Rhetoric, Newly translated by George A. Kennedy, Oxford University Press, New York.
Bell, D. E., H. Raiffa, and A. Tversky (eds.): 1988, Decision Making: Descriptive, Normative and Prescriptive Interactions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Carnap, Rudolf: 1952, The Continuum of Inductive Methods, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Gigerenzer, Gerd, 1991, ‘How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear: Beyond “Heuristic Biases”’, in W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone (eds.), European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 2, John Wiley &; Sons, New York, pp. 83-115.
Hintikka, Jaakko: 1992, 'The Concept of Induction in the Light of the Interrogative Approach to Inquiry", in John Earman (ed.), Inference, Explanation and Other Frustrations: Essays in the Philosophy of Science, University of California Press, pp. 23-43.
Hintikka, Jaakko: 1993, ‘Socratic Questioning, Logic and Rhetoric’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 47, 5-30.
Hintikka, Jaakko: 1995, ‘On Proper (Popper?) and Improper Uses of Information in Epistemology’, Theoria 59, 158-165 (for 1993, appeared 1995).
Hintikka, Jaakko: 2000, ‘The Theory-Ladenness of Intuitions’, in F. Beets and E. Gillet (eds.), Logique en Perspective, Ouisia, Bruxelles, pp. 259-287.
Hintikka, Jaakko, I. Halonen, and A. Mutanen: 1999, ‘Interrogative Logic as a General Theory of Reasoning’, in Dov Gabbay et al. (eds.), Studies in Logic and Practical Reasoning, Vol. I, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 295-337.
Kahneman, D., P. Slovic and A. Tversky (eds.): 1982, Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Moser, P. K. (ed.): 1990, Rationality in Action: Contemporary Approaches, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Newton, Isaac: 1952, Opticks, Dover, New York, pp. 404-405.
Piatelli-Palmerini, Massimo: 1994, Inevitable Illusions, John Wiley &; Sons, New York.
Savage, L. J., et al.: 1962, The Foundations of Statistical Inference, John Wiley &; Sons, New York.
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman: 1983, ‘Extensional versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment’, Psychological Review 90, 293-315.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hintikka, J. A Fallacious Fallacy?. Synthese 140, 25–35 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000029938.17953.10
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000029938.17953.10