Skip to main content
Log in

Is it the ‘alpha’ or the ‘numeric’?: Consumers’ evaluation of letter versus number changes in alphanumeric brand names

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Brand Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article, in five experiments, delineates the effects of alpha and numeric components of alphanumeric brand names (ANBs), by demonstrating the effects of disparities in processing between letter and number sequences on consumers’ brand evaluations. The findings show (i) ascending letters in ANBs (from D10 to E10) lead to more favorable evaluations of line extensions than descending letters in ANBs (from D10 to C10); (ii) line extensions are evaluated more favorably when a line extension ANB is formed with a change in number (from A70 to A80) (versus a change in letter) (from A70 to B70) for an existing ANB; (iii) consumers’ tendency to align brand numbers with product advancements mediates the relative effects of numbers versus letters in brand names and (iv) the observed effects are robust to differences in stimuli and context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Levene’s test for equality of variances was significant (F=17.52, P<0.01); and the assumption of equal variances was rejected. Therefore, we report statistics for preferences using adapted degrees of freedom (Landau and Everitt, 2004). This difference occurred in subsequent studies, which is why we have DF values in decimals for some statistics.

References

  • Adaval, R. and Wyer, R.S. (2011) Conscious and nonconscious comparisons with price anchors: Effects on willingness to pay for related and unrelated products. Journal of Marketing Research 48 (2): 355–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora, S., Kalro, A.D. and Sharma, D. (2015) A comprehensive framework of brand name classification. Journal of Brand Management 22 (2): 79–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auh, S. and Shih, E. (2009) Brand name and consumer inference making in multigenerational product introduction context. Journal of Brand Management 16 (7): 439–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begley, S. (2002) Strawberry is no blackberry: Building brands using sound. The Wall Street Journal. http://www.wsj.com, accessed 30 June 2015.

  • Bergkvist, L. and Rossiter, J.R. (2007) The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research 44 (2): 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damian, M.F. (2004) Asymmetries in the processing of Arabic digits and number words. Memory & Cognition 32 (1): 164–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S. and Akhavein, R. (1995) Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology 21 (2): 314–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, J.S., Holbrook, M.B., Sheng, S. and Cranor, L.F. (2010) Are your participants gaming the system?: Screening mechanical turk workers. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘10), 10–15 April, Atlanta, GA. New York: ACM, pp. 2399–2402.

  • Erlich, J. (1995) Giving drugs a good name. The New York Times Magazine 3 September: pp. 36–37.

  • Fitousi, D. (2010) Dissociating between cardinal and ordinal and between the value and size magnitude of coins. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17 (6): 889–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunasti, K. and Ross Jr W.T. (2010) How and when alphanumeric brand names affect consumer preferences. Journal of Marketing Research 47 (6): 1177–1192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, P.J., Mirkin, M. and Polk, T.A. (2006) Category level contributions to the alphanumeric category effect in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13 (6): 1074–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, S.N. and Nieder, A. (2008) The ABC of cardinal and ordinal number representations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (2): 41–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jingjing, M. and Roese, N.J. (2014) The maximizing mind-set. Journal of Consumer Research 41 (1): 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jou, J. (2003) Multiple number and letter comparisons: Directionality and accessibility in numeric and alphabetic memories. American Journal of Psychology 116 (4): 543–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kachersky, L. and Palermo, N. (2013) How personal pronouns influence brand name preference. Journal of Brand Management 20 (7): 558–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, D. and Janiszewski, C. (2011) The sources and consequences of the fluent processing of numbers. Journal of Marketing Research 48 (2): 327–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klink, R.R. (2000) Creating brand names with meaning: The use of sound symbolism. Marketing Letters 11 (1): 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klink, R.R. and Wu, L. (2014) The role of position, type, and combination of sound symbolism imbeds in brand names. Marketing Letters 25 (1): 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krulich, R. (2011) Vowels control your brain. National Public Radio Blog, 8 December. http://www.npr.org/sections/krulwich/2011/12/07/143265882/vowels-control-your-brain, accessed 30 June 2015.

  • Landau, S. and Everitt, B. (2004) A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using SPSS. Vol. 1 Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D.P., Coxe, S. and Baraldi, A.N. (2012) Guidelines for the investigation of mediating variables in business research. Journal of Business and Psychology 27 (1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maheswaran, D., Mackie, D.M. and Chaiken, S. (1992) Brand name as a heuristic cue: The effects of task importance and expectancy confirmation on consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Psychology 1 (4): 317–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, J.D. (1968) The price-quality relationship in an experimental setting. Journal of Marketing Research 5 (3): 300–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, K.B. (2003) Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions. 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, D.M., LeBoeuf, R.A. and Brewer, N.T. (2008) Anchors aweigh: A demonstration of cross-modality anchoring and magnitude priming. Cognition 106 (1): 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J., Hebrank, A. and Polk, T.A. (2012) Neural dissociation of number from letter recognition and its relationship to parietal numerical processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24 (1): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels-Delassus, V. and Mogos Descotes, R. (2013) Brand name change: Can trust and loyalty be transferred? Journal of Brand Management 20 (8): 656–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavia, T.A. and Costa, J.A. (1993) The winning number: Consumer perceptions of alpha-numeric brand names. Journal of Marketing 57 (3): 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, R. and Monroe, K.B. (1989) The effect of price, brand name, and store name on buyers’ perception of product quality: An integrative review. Journal of Marketing Research 26 (3): 351–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, R.M. and Reiferscheid, I. (2014) Who should be in power to encourage product program innovativeness, R&D or marketing? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 42 (3): 264–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strack, F. and Mussweiler, T. (1997) Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73 (3): 437–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. and Morwitz, V. (2005) Penny wise and pound foolish: The left‐digit effect in price cognition. Journal of Consumer Research 32 (1): 54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegener, D.T., Petty, R.E., Blankenship, K.L. and Detweiler-Bedell, B. (2010) Elaboration and numerical anchoring: Implications of attitude theories for consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology 20 (1): 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, D. and Duclos, R. (2013) Making sense of numbers: Effects of alphanumeric brands on consumer inference. International Journal of Research in Marketing 30 (2): 179–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yorkston, E. and Menon, G. (2004) A sound idea: Phonetic effects of brand names on consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research 31 (1): 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaichkowsky, J.L. (2010) Strategies for distinctive brands. Journal of Brand Management 17 (8): 548–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., Lynch, J.G. and Chen, Q. (2010) Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research 37 (2): 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Robin Coulter, David Norton and Nicholas Lurie for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Selcan Kara.

Appendices

Appendix A

Stimulus for studies 1 and 2A

Stimulus for study 1 – Ascending letters condition

Dell, an electronics brand has the Dell D10 laptop model with the following key features:

illustration

figure d

Dell is planning to introduce a new laptop, Dell E10, in the market with the following specifications:

illustration

figure c

Stimulus for study 2A

illustration

figure b

Appendix B

Stimulus for study 4

illustration

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kara, S., Gunasti, K. & Ross, W. Is it the ‘alpha’ or the ‘numeric’?: Consumers’ evaluation of letter versus number changes in alphanumeric brand names. J Brand Manag 22, 515–533 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2015.28

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2015.28

Keywords

Navigation