Abstract
This article, in five experiments, delineates the effects of alpha and numeric components of alphanumeric brand names (ANBs), by demonstrating the effects of disparities in processing between letter and number sequences on consumers’ brand evaluations. The findings show (i) ascending letters in ANBs (from D10 to E10) lead to more favorable evaluations of line extensions than descending letters in ANBs (from D10 to C10); (ii) line extensions are evaluated more favorably when a line extension ANB is formed with a change in number (from A70 to A80) (versus a change in letter) (from A70 to B70) for an existing ANB; (iii) consumers’ tendency to align brand numbers with product advancements mediates the relative effects of numbers versus letters in brand names and (iv) the observed effects are robust to differences in stimuli and context.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Levene’s test for equality of variances was significant (F=17.52, P<0.01); and the assumption of equal variances was rejected. Therefore, we report statistics for preferences using adapted degrees of freedom (Landau and Everitt, 2004). This difference occurred in subsequent studies, which is why we have DF values in decimals for some statistics.
References
Adaval, R. and Wyer, R.S. (2011) Conscious and nonconscious comparisons with price anchors: Effects on willingness to pay for related and unrelated products. Journal of Marketing Research 48 (2): 355–365.
Arora, S., Kalro, A.D. and Sharma, D. (2015) A comprehensive framework of brand name classification. Journal of Brand Management 22 (2): 79–116.
Auh, S. and Shih, E. (2009) Brand name and consumer inference making in multigenerational product introduction context. Journal of Brand Management 16 (7): 439–454.
Begley, S. (2002) Strawberry is no blackberry: Building brands using sound. The Wall Street Journal. http://www.wsj.com, accessed 30 June 2015.
Bergkvist, L. and Rossiter, J.R. (2007) The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research 44 (2): 175–184.
Damian, M.F. (2004) Asymmetries in the processing of Arabic digits and number words. Memory & Cognition 32 (1): 164–171.
Dehaene, S. and Akhavein, R. (1995) Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology 21 (2): 314–326.
Downs, J.S., Holbrook, M.B., Sheng, S. and Cranor, L.F. (2010) Are your participants gaming the system?: Screening mechanical turk workers. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘10), 10–15 April, Atlanta, GA. New York: ACM, pp. 2399–2402.
Erlich, J. (1995) Giving drugs a good name. The New York Times Magazine 3 September: pp. 36–37.
Fitousi, D. (2010) Dissociating between cardinal and ordinal and between the value and size magnitude of coins. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17 (6): 889–894.
Gunasti, K. and Ross Jr W.T. (2010) How and when alphanumeric brand names affect consumer preferences. Journal of Marketing Research 47 (6): 1177–1192.
Hamilton, P.J., Mirkin, M. and Polk, T.A. (2006) Category level contributions to the alphanumeric category effect in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13 (6): 1074–1077.
Jacob, S.N. and Nieder, A. (2008) The ABC of cardinal and ordinal number representations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (2): 41–43.
Jingjing, M. and Roese, N.J. (2014) The maximizing mind-set. Journal of Consumer Research 41 (1): 71–92.
Jou, J. (2003) Multiple number and letter comparisons: Directionality and accessibility in numeric and alphabetic memories. American Journal of Psychology 116 (4): 543–579.
Kachersky, L. and Palermo, N. (2013) How personal pronouns influence brand name preference. Journal of Brand Management 20 (7): 558–570.
King, D. and Janiszewski, C. (2011) The sources and consequences of the fluent processing of numbers. Journal of Marketing Research 48 (2): 327–341.
Klink, R.R. (2000) Creating brand names with meaning: The use of sound symbolism. Marketing Letters 11 (1): 5–20.
Klink, R.R. and Wu, L. (2014) The role of position, type, and combination of sound symbolism imbeds in brand names. Marketing Letters 25 (1): 13–24.
Krulich, R. (2011) Vowels control your brain. National Public Radio Blog, 8 December. http://www.npr.org/sections/krulwich/2011/12/07/143265882/vowels-control-your-brain, accessed 30 June 2015.
Landau, S. and Everitt, B. (2004) A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using SPSS. Vol. 1 Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
MacKinnon, D.P., Coxe, S. and Baraldi, A.N. (2012) Guidelines for the investigation of mediating variables in business research. Journal of Business and Psychology 27 (1): 1–14.
Maheswaran, D., Mackie, D.M. and Chaiken, S. (1992) Brand name as a heuristic cue: The effects of task importance and expectancy confirmation on consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Psychology 1 (4): 317–336.
McConnell, J.D. (1968) The price-quality relationship in an experimental setting. Journal of Marketing Research 5 (3): 300–334.
Monroe, K.B. (2003) Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions. 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Oppenheimer, D.M., LeBoeuf, R.A. and Brewer, N.T. (2008) Anchors aweigh: A demonstration of cross-modality anchoring and magnitude priming. Cognition 106 (1): 13–26.
Park, J., Hebrank, A. and Polk, T.A. (2012) Neural dissociation of number from letter recognition and its relationship to parietal numerical processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24 (1): 39–50.
Pauwels-Delassus, V. and Mogos Descotes, R. (2013) Brand name change: Can trust and loyalty be transferred? Journal of Brand Management 20 (8): 656–669.
Pavia, T.A. and Costa, J.A. (1993) The winning number: Consumer perceptions of alpha-numeric brand names. Journal of Marketing 57 (3): 85–98.
Rao, R. and Monroe, K.B. (1989) The effect of price, brand name, and store name on buyers’ perception of product quality: An integrative review. Journal of Marketing Research 26 (3): 351–357.
Stock, R.M. and Reiferscheid, I. (2014) Who should be in power to encourage product program innovativeness, R&D or marketing? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 42 (3): 264–276.
Strack, F. and Mussweiler, T. (1997) Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73 (3): 437–446.
Thomas, M. and Morwitz, V. (2005) Penny wise and pound foolish: The left‐digit effect in price cognition. Journal of Consumer Research 32 (1): 54–64.
Wegener, D.T., Petty, R.E., Blankenship, K.L. and Detweiler-Bedell, B. (2010) Elaboration and numerical anchoring: Implications of attitude theories for consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology 20 (1): 5–16.
Yan, D. and Duclos, R. (2013) Making sense of numbers: Effects of alphanumeric brands on consumer inference. International Journal of Research in Marketing 30 (2): 179–184.
Yorkston, E. and Menon, G. (2004) A sound idea: Phonetic effects of brand names on consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research 31 (1): 43–51.
Zaichkowsky, J.L. (2010) Strategies for distinctive brands. Journal of Brand Management 17 (8): 548–560.
Zhao, X., Lynch, J.G. and Chen, Q. (2010) Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research 37 (2): 197–206.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Robin Coulter, David Norton and Nicholas Lurie for their helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A
Stimulus for studies 1 and 2A
Stimulus for study 1 – Ascending letters condition
Dell, an electronics brand has the Dell D10 laptop model with the following key features:
Dell is planning to introduce a new laptop, Dell E10, in the market with the following specifications:
Stimulus for study 2A
Appendix B
Stimulus for study 4
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kara, S., Gunasti, K. & Ross, W. Is it the ‘alpha’ or the ‘numeric’?: Consumers’ evaluation of letter versus number changes in alphanumeric brand names. J Brand Manag 22, 515–533 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2015.28
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2015.28