Skip to main content
Log in

Flexible decision support in dynamic inter-organisational networks

  • Special Section Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

An effective Decision Support System (DSS) should help its users improve decision making in complex, information-rich environments. We present a feature gap analysis that shows that current decision support technologies lack important qualities for a new generation of agile business models that require easy, temporary integration across organisational boundaries. We enumerate these qualities as DSS Desiderata, properties that can contribute both effectiveness and flexibility to users in such environments. To address this gap, we describe a new design approach that enables users to compose decision behaviours from separate, configurable components, and allows dynamic construction of analysis and modelling tools from small, single-purpose evaluator services. The result is what we call an ‘evaluator service network’ that can easily be configured to test hypotheses and analyse the impact of various choices for elements of decision processes. We have implemented and tested this design in an interactive version of the MinneTAC trading agent, an agent designed for the Trading Agent Competition for Supply Chain Management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

References

  • Adam F and Pomerol JC (2002) Critical factors in the development of executive systems – leveraging the dashboard approach. In Decision Making Support Systems: Achievements and Challenges for the New Decade (MORA M, FORGIONNE G and GUPTA J, Eds), pp 305–330, Idea Group Inc, Hershey, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariely D (2008) Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. HarperCollins, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnott D and Pervan G (2007) Eight key issues for the decision support systems discipline. Decision Support Systems 44, 657–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berners-Lee T, Hendler J and Lassila O (2001) Semantic web. Scientific American Magazine 284 (5), 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau B, Neumann D, Weinhardt C and Michalk W (2008) Provisioning of service mashup topologies. In Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2008 (Goldenn W, Acton T, Conboy K, van der Heijden H and Tuunainen VK Eds) Galway, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau B, Van Dinther C, Conte T, Xu Y and Weinhardt C (2009) How to coordinate value generation in service networks: a mechanism design approach. Business and Information Systems Engineering 1 (5), 343–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark TD, Jones MC and Armstrong CP (2007) The dynamic structure of management support systems: theory development, research focus, and direction. MIS Quarterly 31 (3), 579–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins J, Arunachalam R, Sadeh N, Ericsson J, Finne N and Janson S (2005) The supply chain management game for the 2006 trading agent competition. Tech. Rep. CMU-ISRI-05-132, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. November.

  • Collins J, Ketter W and Gini M (2008) Flexible decision support in a dynamic business network. In The Network Experience – New Value from Smart Business Networks (VERVEST P, VAN LIERE D and ZHENG L, Eds), pp 233–246, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins J, Ketter W and Gini M (2009) Flexible decision control in an autonomous trading agent. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 8 (2), 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirkan H, Kauffman RJ, Vayghan JA, Fill HG, Karagiannis D and Maglio PP (2008) Service-oriented technology and management: perspectives on research and practice for the coming decade. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 7 (4), 356–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckerson WW (2005) Performance Dashboards: Measuring, Monitoring, and Managing Your Business. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteves J and Pastor J (2001) Enterprise resource planning systems research: an annotated bibliography. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 7 (8), 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Few S (2006) Information Dashboard Design: The Effective Visual Communication of Data. O’Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil Y, Ratnakar V, Kim J, González PA, Groth P, Moody J and Deelman E (2010) WINGS: intelligent workflow-based design of computational experiments. IEEE Intelligent Systems 25, forthcoming.

  • Goldman S, Nagel R and Preiss K (1995) Agile Competitors and Virtual Organizations. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hevner A, March S, Park J and Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. Management Information Systems Quarterly 28 (1), 75–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogeweegen M, van Liere D, Vervest P, Van Der Meijden L and De Lepper I (2006) Strategizing for mass customization by playing the business networking game. Decision Support Systems 42 (3), 1402–1412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huhns MN and Singh MP (2005) Service-oriented computing: key concepts and principles. IEEE Internet Computing 9 (1), 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inmon W (2005) Building the Data Warehouse. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson P (1998) Introduction to Expert Systems 3rd edn, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambil A and Short J (1994) Electronic integration and business network redesign: a roles-linkage perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems 10 (4), 59–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketter W (2007) Identification and prediction of economic regimes to guide decision making in multi-agent marketplaces. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota, Twin-Cities, U.S.A.

  • Ketter W, Banjanin M, Guikers R and Kayser A (2009a) Introducing an agile method for enterprise mash-up development. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing (Hofreiter B and Werthner H, Eds) IEEE, Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketter W, Collins J, Gini M, Gupta A and Schrater P (2007) A predictive empirical model for pricing and resource allocation decisions. In Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Electronic Commerce (Dellarocas C and Dignum F, Eds), pp 449–458, ACM, Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketter W, Collins J, Gini M, Gupta A and Schrater P (2009b) Detecting and forecasting economic regimes in multi-agent automated exchanges. Decision Support Systems 47 (4), 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen J, Pajunen L and Puustjarvi J (2003) Automatic composition of web service workflows using a semantic agent. In Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI’ 03), (Liu J, Faltings B, Klusch M and Liu C Eds), pp 566–569, IEEE Computer Society, Halifax, Canada.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ludascher B, Altintas I, Berkley C, Higgins D, Jaeger E, Jones M, Lee EA, Tao J and Zhao Y (2006) Scientific workflow management and the Kepler system. Concurrency and Computation 18 (10), 1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcfarlan FW and Young F (2002) Li & Fung (A): internet issues. Harvard Business School Case pp, 9–301.

  • Mulholland A, Thomas C, Kurchina P and Woods D (2006) Mashup Corporations: The End of Business as Usual. Evolved Technologist Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragsdale C (2004) Spreadsheet Modeling and Decision Analysis. Thomson/South-Western Mason, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao J and Su X (2004) A survey of automated web service composition methods. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Semantic Web Services and Web Process Composition (Cardoso J and Sheth A, Eds) Springer, San Diego, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson L and Ruby S (2007) Restful Web Services. O’Reilly, Sebastopol, CA USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roman D, Keller U, Lausen H, De Bruijn J, Lara R, Stollberg M, Polleres A, Feier C, Bussler C and Fensel D (2005) Web service modeling ontology. Applied Ontology 1 (1), 77–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez R (1995) Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strategic Management Journal 16, 135–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz B (2004) The tyranny of choice. Scientific American 290 (4), 70–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shmueli G, Patel N and Bruce P (2006) Data Mining for Business Intelligence: Concepts, Techniques, and Applications in Microsoft Office Excel with XLMiner. Wiley-Interscience: Hoboken, NJ USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1979) Rational decision making in business organizations. The American Economic Review 69 (4), 493–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirin E, Hendler J and Parsia B (2003) Semi-automatic composition of web services using semantic descriptions. In Web Services: Modeling, Architecture and Infrastructure at ICEIS, Bézivin J, Hu J, Tari Z, Eds., ICEIS Press Angers, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd PM and Gigerenzer G (2001) Précis of simple heuristics that make us smart. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5), 727–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traverso P and Pistore M (2004) Automated composition of semantic web services into executable processes. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp 380–394.

  • van Heck E and Vervest PHM (2007) Smart business networks: how the network wins. Communications of ACM 50 (6), 28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Liere DW, Koppius OR and Vervest PHM (2008) Network horizon: an information-based view on the dynamics of bridging positions. Advances in Strategic Management 25, 595–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vervest PHM, van Liere D and Zheng L (2008) The Network Experience – New Value from Smart Business Networks. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitvar T, Mocan A, Kerrigan M, Moran M, Cimpian M, Haselwanter T and Fensel D (2007) Semantically-enabled service oriented architecture: concepts, technology and application. Service Oriented Computing and Applications 1 (2), 129–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu D, Parsia B, Sirin E, Hendler J and Nau D (2003) Automating DAML-S web services composition using SHOP2. In Proceedings of 2nd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2003), Goos G, Hartmanis J, and van Leeuwen J Eds., Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu L (2007) Introduction to the Semantic Web and Semantic Web Services. Chapman & Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL USA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A preliminary version of this paper (Collins et al., 2008) was presented at the Smart Business Network conference in Beijing, May 2008, and won the best paper award. Partial support for Maria Gini is gratefully acknowledged from the National Science Foundation under award NSF/IIS-0414466.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Collins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Collins, J., Ketter, W. & Gini, M. Flexible decision support in dynamic inter-organisational networks. Eur J Inf Syst 19, 436–448 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.24

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.24

Keywords

Navigation