Skip to main content
Log in

introduction: women in european political science

  • Symposium
  • Published:
European Political Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This symposium explores the ways in which women are descriptively represented in political science, by exploring the ways in which they are positioned institutionally in Spain, Finland, Germany and the United Kingdom. The symposium also explores the ways in which structures may serve to disadvantage women, by analysing HE policy and citation practices. Critical theory reminds us that in observing power structures we can seek to change them, and so our conclusion reflects on some more practical suggestions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amey, M.J. and Eddy, P.L. (2002) ‘Leadership’, in A.M. Martinez Aleman and K.A. Renn (eds.) Women in Higher Education, Santa Barbara, CA: ABC: CLIO, pp. 482–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amey, M.J. and Twombly, S.B. (1992) ‘Revisioning leadership in community colleges’, Review of Higher Education 15 (2): 125–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, S., Jenkins, L. and Pflaeger, Z. (2012) ‘Women in the Profession: The composition of UK Political Science Departments by Sex’, Politics 32 (3): 139–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Editorial. (2013) ‘Science for all’, Nature 7th March (495): 5.

  • Enloe, C. (2013) Seriously! Investigating Crashes and Crises as If Women Mattered, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, C. and Rouse, C. (2000) ‘Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of ‘blind’ auditions on female musicians’, The American Economic Review 90 (4): 715–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. and Sandler, B. (1982) The Classroom Climate a Chilly One for Women, Washington, DC Project on the status and education of women Association of American Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesli, V., Lee, J.M. and Mitchell, S.M. (2012) ‘Predicting rank attainment in political science: What else besides publication affects promotion?’ PS: Political Science and Politics 45 (3): 475–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpowitz, C., Mendelberg, T. and Shaker, L. (2012) ‘Gender inequality in deliberative participation’, American Political Science Review 106 (3): 533–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D. and Richards, W. (2003) ‘Sex discrimination in UK academia’, Gender, Work & Organisation 10 (2): 213–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millett, K. (1977) Sexual Politics, London: Virago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss-Racusin, C., Dovidiob, J.F., Brescollc, V.L., Grahama, M.J. and Handelsman, J. (2012) ‘Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109 (41): 16474–16479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A. (1979/1986) On Lies, Secrets and Silence, London: Virago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savigny, H. (2014) ‘Women, Know your limits: cultural sexism in academia’, Gender and Education 26 (7): 794–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

bates, s., savigny, h. introduction: women in european political science. Eur Polit Sci 14, 75–78 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2015.3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2015.3

Keywords

Navigation