Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Identifying better systems design in Australian maternity care: a Boundary Critique analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Health Systems

Abstract

This paper examines the background and limitations of maternity care policy and provision in Australia using the Boundary Critique (BC) method from critical systems thinking. We argue that the historical legacy of funding maternity care within medically dominated fee-for-service structures and acute hospital budgets is seriously flawed. Furthermore, it cannot deliver the policy goals of healthy and socially equitable birth practices. Despite the 2009 national Maternity Services Review (MSR) and progress of a National Maternity Services Plan (2011), most mainstream Australian maternity services remain out-of-step with both health service research and evidence-based ‘best practice’. The present system drives unnecessary clinical interventions, increased expenditure, short-term adverse health outcomes and the potential for a larger, unacknowledged legacy of future chronic disease. By contrast, BC analysis suggests that redesigning for good maternity service provision can act as a population-level preventative health strategy, offering better value, better health and improved equity in maternity care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian College of Midwives. (2005) Solving maternity workforce shortages through getting the skill mix right. Submission from the Australian College of Midwives to the Australian Government, Productivity Commission Inquiry into the Health Workforce, 2005, July, 1–36.

  • Australian Health Ministers Advisory Council (AHMAC). (2008) Primary Maternity Services in Australia – A Framework for Implementation. AHMAC, Canberra.

  • Australian Health Ministers Advisory Council (AHMAC). (2010) Australian Health Ministers, Communique. Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra.

  • Australian Health Workforce Advisory Committee. (2002) The Midwifery Workforce in Australia 2002–2012. AHWAC, Sydney.

  • Australian Health Workforce Advisory Committee. (2004) The Specialist Obstetrics and Gynaecology Workforce in Australia. AHWAC, Sydney.

  • AIHW National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit and AIHW. (2013) National Core Maternity Indicators. Cat. no. PER 58. Canberra.

  • Australian Senate. (1999) Rocking the Cradle: Federal Senate Inquiry into Childbirth Procedures. AGPS, Canberra.

  • Bacchi C (2009) Analysing Policy: What’s the Problem Represented to Be? NSW, Pearson, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay L, Brodie P, Lane K, Leap N, Reiger K and Tracy S (2003) The Australian midwifery action project report. Centre for Family Health and Midwifery, University of Technology, Sydney.

  • Barclay L (2008) Woman and midwives: position, problems and potential. Midwifery 24 (1), 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay L and Tracy S (2010) Legally binding midwives to doctors is not collaboration. Women and Birth 23 (1), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit C, Zadoroznyj M, Hallgrimsdottir H, Treloar A and Taylor K (2010) Medical dominance and neoliberalisation in maternal care provision: The evidence from Canada and Australia. Social Science & Medicine 71 (3), 475–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biró M, Waldenstrom U and Pannifex J.H (2000) Team midwifery care in a tertiary level obstetric service: a randomized controlled trial. Birth 27 (3), 168–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birthplace in England Collaborative Group and NPEU. (2011) Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies. British Medical Journal 343: d7400.

  • Bogossian F (2010) An urgent call to implement systematic monitoring of a comprehensive set of quality indicators for maternity services. Women and Birth 23 (1), 36–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd A, Brown M and Midgley G (1999) Developing Services with Young People Missing from Home or Care. Centre for Systems Studies, Hull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buist A, Austin MP, Hayes BA, Speelman C, Bilszta JL and Gemmell AW (2008) Postnatal mental health of women giving birth in Australia 2002–2004: findings from the Beyondblue National Postnatal Depression Program. Australian New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 42 (1), 66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardwell C et al (2008) Caesarean section is associated with an increased risk of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Diabetologia 51 (5), 726–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE). (2009) Extended Medicare Safety Net Review Report, University of Technology, Sydney, Australian Government.

  • Chapman C (2007) Birth cost information, Netherlands Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport, Curative Care Department/Primary Care and Integrated Care Division. The Hague: direct correspondence 19 April, as compared to Australian figures quoted September 2008 in Improving Maternity Services: Discussion Paper.

  • Cherniak D and Fisher J (2008) Explaining obstetric interventionism. Women’s Studies International Forum 31 (4), 270–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childbirth Australia. (2012) Homepage. http://childbirth.org.au/, accessed 10 September.

  • Churchman C (1968) The Systems Approach. Dell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman C (1970) Operations research as a profession. Management Science 17 (2), B37–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchman C (1987) Systems profile: discoveries in an exploration into systems thinking. Systems Research 4 (22), 13–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia (COA). (2008) Improving maternity services in Australia: a Discussion Paper. Department of Health and Ageing (DOHA), Canberra.

  • Commonwealth of Australia (COA). (2009a) The Report of the Maternity Services Review. DOHA, Canberra.

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (2009b) Explanatory Memorandum: The Health Legislation Amendment (Midwives and Nurse Practitioners) Bill, Government of Australia, Canberra, http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2009B00133?Explanatory%20Memorandum/Text.

  • Commonwealth of Australia (COA). (2011) National Maternity Services Plan. The Australian Health Ministers Conference, Canberra.

  • Community Midwifery Western Australia (CMWA) Incorporated. (2006) Annual Report 2005–2006. CMWA, Fremantle.

  • Dahlen H, Jackson M and Stevens J (2011a) Homebirth, freebirth and doulas: casualty and consequences of a broken maternity system. Women and Birth 24 (1), 47–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlen H, Schmied V, Tracy SK, Jackson M, Cummings J and Priddis H (2011b) Homebirth and the national Australian Maternity Services Review: too hot to handle? Women and Birth 24 (4), 148–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlen H, Tracy S, Tracy M, Bisits A, Brown C and Thornton C (2012) Rates of obstetric intervention among low-risk women giving birth in private and public hospitals in NSW: a population-based descriptive study. British Medical Journal Open 2012 2: e001723 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis – Floyd RE, Barclay L, Daviss BA and Tritten J (2009) Birth Models That Work. University of California Press Ltd, Berkeley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health and Ageing. (2010) Eligible Midwives Questions and Answers. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/midwives-nurse-pract-quanda#10, accessed 13 August 2012.

  • Department of Health and Ageing (DOHA). (2011a) Council of Australian Governments National Health Reform Agreement: 1–70, http://www.federalfinancialrelations.gov.au/content/npa/health_reform/national-agreement.pdf, accessed 10 September 2012.

  • Department of Health and Ageing (DOHA). (2011b) Extended Medicare Safety Net Review of Capping Arrangements Report: a Report by the Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation – Contextual Overview. Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra.

  • De Vries R, Benoit C, Van Teijlingen E and Wrede S (2001) Birth by Design: Pregnancy, Maternity Care and Midwifery in North America and Northern Europe. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries R (2004) A Pleasing Birth: Midwives and Maternity Care in the Netherlands. Temple University Press, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries R, Wiegers TA, Smulders B and Van Teijlingen E (2009) The dutch obstetrical system: vanguard of the future in maternity care. In Birth Models that Work (Davis–Floyd R, Barclay L, Daviss B and Tritten J, Eds), pp 31–53, University of California Press, Berkley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan – Fernandez R (1996) Personal, professional structural and cultural challenges to autonomous practice – a midwife’s perspective. In (SA Branch et al, Ed) Autonomous Practice in Nursing and Midwifery. Conference Proceedings, Australian Nursing Federation: 58-69.

  • Donnellan-Fernandez R (2011a) Having a baby in Australia: women’s business, risky business or big business? Outskirts: Feminisms Along the Edge 24, http://www.outskirts.arts.uwa.edu.au/volumes/volume-24/donnellan-fernandez.

  • Donnellan-Fernandez R (2011b) Lifecourse measures to evaluate the equity of cost and quality in public health midwifery models. Women and Birth 24 (S1), S37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan-Fernandez R and Eastaugh M (2003) Midwifery regulation in Australia: a century of invisibility, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on the Regulation of Nursing and Midwifery, Melbourne, October.

  • Duckett S (2008) The Australian Health Care System, 3rd edn, OUP, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie J (1991) The Price of Health. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Government of South Australia. (2006) Midwifery Group Practice: An Evaluation of Clinical Effectiveness, Quality and Sustainability. CYWHS: Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Adelaide.

  • Government of New Zealand. (2007) New Zealand Primary Maternity Services Notice 2007, Ministry of Health, Wellington.

  • Gray G (2000) Private practice publicly supported: equity in hospital and medical financing. Just Policy 18: 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1972) Knowledge and Human Interests. Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartz D, Foureur M and Tracy S.K (2012a) Australian caseload midwifery: the exception or the rule. Women and Birth 25 (1), 39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartz D et al (2012b) Australian maternity reform through clinical redesign. Australian Health Review 36: 169–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatem M, Sandall J, Devane D, Soltani H and Gates S (2009) Midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women (Review) Cochrane Database Systematic Review, Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd: 1–101.

  • Health Workforce Australia (HWA). (2012) Health Workforce, 2025: Doctors, Nurses and Midwives – Vol. 1, HWA, Adelaide, pp 1–178.

  • Health Amendment (Midwives and Nurse Practitioners) Act. (2010) Act No 29. of 2010 as amended, Australian Government Commonwealth Law. http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2012C00830, accessed 30 March 2013.

  • Hendry C (2009) The New Zealand maternity system. In Birth Models That Work (Davis–Floyd R, Barclay L, Daviss B and Tritten J Eds), pp 55–86, University of California Press, Berkley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hodnett E et al (2004) Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Systematic Review.

  • Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ and Sakala C (2012) Continuous support for women during childbirth (Review) Cochrane Database Systematic Review, Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd: 1-113.

  • Homer C, Brodie P and Leap N (2001) Collaboration in maternity care: a randomized controlled trial comparing community-based continuity of care with standard hospital care. British Journal Obstetrics & Gynecology 108 (1), 16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homer CSE et al (2009) The role of the midwife in Australia: views of women and midwives. Midwifery 25 (6), 673–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houd S, Qinuajuak J and Epoo B (2003) The outcome of perinatal care in Inukjuak, Nunavik, Canada 1998–2002. Circumpolar Health 63 (Suppl 2), 239–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde MJ, Mostyn N, Modi N and Kemp P (2012) The health implications of birth by Caesarean section. Biological Reviews 87 (1), 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Confederation of Midwives. (2010) Global Standards for Midwifery Education: http://www.internationalmidwives.org/, accessed 10 September 2012.

  • Kildea S et al (2010) ‘Closing the Gap’: how maternity services can contribute to reducing poor maternal infant health outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women. Rural and Remote Health 10: 1383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kildea S, Pollock W.E and Barclay L (2008) Making pregnancy safer in Australia: the importance of maternal death review. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 48 (2), 130–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kildea S and Wardaguga M (2009) Childbirth in Australia: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women. In Science Across Cultures: The History of Non-Western Science, Vol 5, Childbirth Across Cultures: Ideas and Practices of Pregnancy, Childbirth and the Postpartum (Selin H and Stone P, Eds), pp 275–286, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintrea K (1996) Whose partnership? Community interests in the regeneration of a Scottish housing scheme. Housing studies 11: 287–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane K (2012) When is collaboration not collaboration? When it’s militarized. Women and Birth 25 (1), 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laws P.J, Abeywardena S, Walker J and Sullivan E.A (2007) Australia’s Mothers and Babies 2005 Cat. no. PER 40 AIHW National Perinatal Statistics Unit, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Zeki R, Hilder L and Sullivan EA (2012) Australia’s Mothers and Babies 2010 Cat. no. PER 57 AIHW National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch J (2011) Why are economists interested in early childhood health and development? 7th Annual Healthy Development Adelaide Oration, 25 August, University of Adelaide.

  • MacDonald M and Bourgeault I (2009) The Ontario Midwifery Model of Care. In Birth Models That Work (Davis–Floyd R, Barclay L, Daviss B and Tritten J Eds), pp 89–117, University of California Press, Berkley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maternity Coalition. (2002) National Maternity Action Plan for the introduction of community midwifery services in urban and regional Australia. Birth Matters 6 (3), 2–23.

  • Maternity Coalition. (2008) Funding primary maternity care: a proposal to address cost shifting as an obstacle to public, primary maternity services. http://www.maternitycoalition.org.au, accessed 10 September 2012.

  • Mcauley I and Menadue J (2007) A health policy for Australia: reclaiming universal health care. Centre for Policy Development, Rethink Paper no. 1, May.

  • Mccourt C and Page L (1996) Report on the Evaluation of One-to-One Midwifery. Thames Valley University, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre M (2012) Safety of non-medically-led primary maternity care models: a critical review of the international literature. Australian Health Review 36 (2), 140–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan HL et al (2012) Effects of continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) on caesarean section rates in women of low obstetric risk: the COSMOS randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 119 (12), 1483–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G (2000) Systemic Intervention: Philosophy, Methodology, and Practice. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G (2006) Systemic intervention for public health. American Journal Public Health 96 (3), 466–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Health (Collaborative arrangements for midwives) Determination. (2010) – F2010L02105, http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2010L02105, accessed 30 March 2013.

  • Newman L (2009) The health care system as a social determinant of health: qualitative insights from South Australian maternity consumers. Australian Health Review 33 (1), 62–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman L and Johnston J (2005) Maternity care: a human rights issue? Birth Matters 9 (1), 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman L, Reiger K and Campo M (2011) Maternity coalition: Australia’s national maternity consumer advocacy organization. In The 21st Century Motherhood Movement (O’Reilly A Ed), pp 80–92, Demeter Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newnham E (2010) Midwifery directions: the Australian maternity services review. Health Sociology Review 19 (2), 245–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon A, Byrne J and Church A (2003) The Community Midwives Project: An Evaluation of the Set Up of the Northern Women’s Community Midwives Project. Northern Metropolitan Community Health Service, Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary CM, Der Klerk N, Keogh J, Pennell C, Der Groot J and York L (2007) Trends in mode of delivery during 1984–2003: can they be explained by pregnancy and delivery complications? British Journal Obstetrics & Gynecology 114 (7), 855–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia. (2006) The Blame Game Report on the Inquiry into Health Funding. House of Representatives Standing Committee on Health and Ageing, Canberra.

  • Podger A (2006) Reconceiving federal-state-regional arrangements in health. In Federalism and Regionalism in Australia: New Approaches, New Institutions? (Brown A and Bellamy J Eds), pp 135–154, Australian National University ePress, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power C, Nixon A and O’donnell K et al (2008) Evaluation of the Southern Aboriginal Maternity Care Project. Southern Adelaide Health Service, Government of South Australia, Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlivan B (2004) Medicare cuts an artery. Business Review Weekly. 11–17 November, p 26.

  • Reiger K (1985) The Disenchantment of the Home: Modernising the Australian Family, 1880–1940. Oxford University Press, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiger K (2001) Our Bodies, Our Babies. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiger K (2006) A neoliberal quickstep: contradictions in Australian maternity policy [Special issue]. Health Sociology Review. Childbirth, Politics and the Culture of Risk 15 (4), 330–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiger K (2008) Domination or mutual recognition? Professional subjectivity in midwifery and obstetrics. Social Theory & Health 6: 132–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiger K (2011) ‘Knights’ or ‘knaves’? Public policy, professional power and reforming maternity services. Healthcare for Women International 32 (1), 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiger K and Dempsey R (2006) Performing birth in a culture of fear [Special issue]. Health Sociology Review. Childbirth, Politics and the Culture of Risk 15 (4), 363–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiger K and Lane K (2009) Working together: collaboration between midwives and doctors in public hospitals. Australian Health Review 33 (2), 315–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiger K and Lane K (2013) ‘How can we go on caring when nobody here cares about us?’ Australian public maternity units as contested care sites. Women and Birth 26 (133), 137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiger K and Morton C (2012) Standardizing or Individualizing?A critical analysis of the ‘Discursive Imaginaries’ shaping maternity care reform. International Journal of Childbirth 2 (3), 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhartz D, Blais R, Fraser WD and Contandriopoulos AP (2000) Cost-effectiveness of midwifery services versus medical services in Quebec. Canadian Journal Public Health 91 (1), 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts CL, Tracy S and Peat B (2000) Rates for obstetric intervention among private and public patients in Australia: population based descriptive study. British Medical Journal 321: 137–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rural Doctors Association of Australia (RDAA). (2007) Press Release.

  • Sakala C and Corry M (2008) Evidence-based Maternity Care. Milbank Memorial Fund, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sax S (1984) A Strife of Interests: Medical Power and Politics in Australia. Allen& Unwin, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherman S, Smith J and Davidson M (2008) The first year of a midwifery-led model of care in far North Queensland. Medical Journal of Australia 188 (2), 85–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield T (1995) A Politics of Childbirth: Public Policy and Childbirth in New South Wales, 1950–1990. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney.

  • Segal L (2008) Health reform: a healthy community and a healthy economy, do we have to choose? Gift of Knowledge Public Seminar, University of South Australia: 15 July, Adelaide.

  • Shorten B and Shorten A (2000) Women’s choice? The impact of private health insurance on episiotomy rates in Australian hospitals. Midwifery 16 (3), 204–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorten A and Shorten B (2007) What happens when a private hospital comes to town?: the impact of the ‘public’ to ‘private’ hospital shift on regional birthing outcomes. Women and Birth 20 (2), 49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standing Council on Health (SCoH). (2012) August 10, Communique, www.ahmac.gov.au, accessed 1 November 2012.

  • Stavrou EP, Ford J, Shand AW, Morris JW and Roberts CL (2011) Epidemiology and trends for caesarean section births in New South Wales, Australia: a population based study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, online 11: 8, doi:10.1186/1471-2393-11-8, http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/11/8.

  • Summers A (1995) For I have ever so much more faith in her ability as a nurse: The eclipse of the community midwife in South Australia 1836–1942. Ph.D.Thesis, Flinders University, SA.

  • The White Ribbon Alliance For Safe Motherhood. (2011) Respectful maternity care: the universal rights of childbearing women, http://www.whiteribbonalliance.org/, accessed 10 September 2012.

  • Tracy M and Tracy S (2003) Costing the cascade: estimating the cost of increased obstetric intervention in childbirth using population data. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 110: 717–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy S.K, Hartz D, Nicholl M, Mccann Y and Latta D (2005) An integrated service network in maternity: the implementation of a free standing midwifery led unit. Australian Health Review 29 (3), 332–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy S and Hartz D (2006) The Quality Review of Ryde Midwifery Group Practice, September 2004–October 2005. Northern Sydney and Central Coast Health, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy SK, Sullivan ES, Dahlen H, Wang YA, Black D and Tracy M (2006) Does size matter? A population based study of birth in lower volume maternity hospitals for low risk women. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 113 (1), 86–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy SK, Sullivan EA, Wang AW, Black D and Tracy M (2007a) Birth outcomes associated with interventions in labour amongst low risk women: a population based study. Women and Birth 20 (2), 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy SK, Tracy MB and Sullivan ES (2007b) Admission of term infants to neonatal intensive care: a population based study. Birth 34 (4), 301–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy SK et al (2013) Caseload midwifery for women of all risk compared to standard hospital care: a randomized controlled trial (Midwives @ New group practice options: M@NGO trial). Lancet: accepted for publication June 13 (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12609000349246, http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/11/82).

  • Turnbull D et al (2009) An evaluation of midwifery group practice. Part I: clinical effectiveness. Women and Birth 22 (1), 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (1998) Systems thinking as if people mattered: critical systems thinking for citizens and managers. Working Paper no. 23, Lincoln School of Management, UK: pp 1–15.

  • Ulrich W (2000) Reflective practice in the civil society: the contribution of critically systemic thinking. Reflective Practice 1 (2), 247–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (2002) Boundary Critique. In The Informed Student Guide to Management Science (Daellenbach H and Flood R Eds), pp 41–42, Thomson Learning, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (2003) A brief introduction to critical systems thinking for professionals & citizens, http://wulrich.com/cst_brief.html, accessed 30 March 2013.

  • Ulrich W (2006) Critical pragmatism: a new approach to professional and business ethics. In Interdisciplinary Yearbook of Business Ethics (Zsolnai L, Ed) Vol 1, pp 53–85, Peter Lang Academic Publishers, Oxford UK, and Bern, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1996) Report of the fourth world conference on women, Beijing, 4–15 September, UN: New York, Item 96, p 36.

  • Van Gool K, Savage E, Viney R, Haas M and Anderson R (2009) Who’s getting caught? An analysis of the Australian medicare safety net. The Economic Review 42 (2), 143–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner M (2006) Born in the USA: How a Broken Maternity System Must Be Fixed to Put Women and Children First. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh D (2006) Subverting the assembly-line: childbirth in a free-standing birth centre. Social Science & Medicine 62 (6), 1330–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis E (1989) Medical Dominance: The Division of Labour in Australian Health Care, 2nd edn, Allen & Unwin, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson NW, Couper ID, De Vries E, Reid S, Fish T and Marais BJ (2009) A critical review of interventions to redress the inequitable distribution of healthcare professionals to rural and remote areas, Remote Health 9, online: 1060, http://www.rrh.org.au/articles/showarticlenew.asp?ArticleID=1060, accessed 26 April 2012.

  • World Health Organisation (WHO). (1996) Care In Normal Birth: A Practical Guide. Family and Reproductive Health: WHO, Geneva, http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1996/WHO_FRH_MSM_96.24.pdf accessed 10 September 2012.

  • World Health Organisation (WHO). (2006) Standards for Maternal and Neonatal Care. Department of Making Pregnancy Safer and Department of Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva.

  • World Health Organisations Commission on the Social Determinants of Health. (2007) Challenging health inequity through health systems, Final Report, Knowledge Network on Health Systems: WHO, Geneva.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Women’s and Children’s Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia

    Roslyn Donnellan-Fernandez

  2. School of Nursing and Midwifery Faculty of Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia

    Roslyn Donnellan-Fernandez

  3. Southgate Institute for Health Society and Equity, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia

    Lareen Newman

  4. School of Social Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    Kerreen Reiger

  5. University of Sydney and the Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney NSW, Australia

    Sally K Tracy

Authors
  1. Roslyn Donnellan-Fernandez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lareen Newman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kerreen Reiger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sally K Tracy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roslyn Donnellan-Fernandez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Donnellan-Fernandez, R., Newman, L., Reiger, K. et al. Identifying better systems design in Australian maternity care: a Boundary Critique analysis. Health Syst 2, 213–225 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/hs.2013.7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hs.2013.7

Keywords

Search

Navigation