Abstract
Research on information technology has been focused primarily on the worlds of IT and management systems for business and government to the relative neglect of research on the digital and institutional infrastructures that underpin the research enterprise itself. When digital research is studied, the emphasis has been on the diffusion of technological innovations, rather than the social and political dynamics shaping the design and role of technologies in research. However, what researchers know, and with whom they collaborate, could be transformed through the strategic use of advances designed to support research, defined here as ‘research-centred computational networks’. This article presents a framework for conceptualizing the social and technological choices shaping the next generation of research in ways that could open – democratize – key aspects of the research process that move well beyond academic publication. The framework highlights the limited scope of innovation to date, and identifies a variety of factors that maintain and enhance institutional control over the research process, at the risk of losing the creative and productive bottom-up participation by networked researchers and citizen researchers among the public at large. Conceptualizing, prioritizing and advancing study of next generation research is one of the most significant but difficult challenges facing scholars of information technology.
Notes
Details about OeSS are available at: http://microsites.oii.ox.ac.uk/oess/.
More detailed discussion of individual case studies are provided on the project Web site at: http://microsites.oii.ox.ac.uk/oess/.
The notion of networked individuals corresponds to the term ‘networked individualism’ used by Barry Wellman (2001) to break old dichotomies between the individual and place-based communities. I have developed and extended this concept in my work on the Fifth Estate (Dutton, 2007).
References
Atkins, D. (2005). Transformation through Cyberinfrastructure-based Knowledge Environments, in W.H. Dutton, B. Kahin, R. O’Callaghan and A.W. Wyckoff (eds.) Transforming Enterprise: The Economic and Social Implications of Information Technology, Cambridge, UK: MIT Press, pp. 155–176.
Berman, F., Fox, G. and Hey, A.J.G. (eds.) (2003). Grid Computing: Making the global infrastructure a reality, Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
Borgman, C. (2007). Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, infrastructure, and the internet, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cardoso, G., Caraça, J., Espanha, R. and Mendonça, S. (2010). The Politics of Open Access, in W.H. Dutton and P.W. Jeffreys (eds.) World Wide Research: Reshaping the sciences and humanities, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 317–321.
David, P.A., den Besten, M. and Schroeder, R. (2010). Will e-Science be Open Science?, in W.H. Dutton and P.W. Jeffreys (eds.) World Wide Research: Reshaping the sciences and humanities, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 299–316.
David, P.A. and Spence, M. (2010). Institutional Infrastructures for Global Research Networks in the Public Sector, in W.H. Dutton and P.W. Jeffreys (eds.) World Wide Research: Reshaping the sciences and humanities, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 191–213.
Den Besten, M.L. and David, P.A. (2009). Data and Information Access in e-Research: Results from a 2008 survey among UK s-Science Project Participants, OII Research Report No. 18, January.
Dormans, S. (2009). Collaboratories in Social Sciences and Humanities, Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on e-Social Science, Workshop on ‘Imagining, Identifying, and Investigating e-Research: An Extended Exploration’, Cologne, Germany, 24 June.
Dutton, W.H. (1992). The Ecology of Games Shaping Communication Policy, Communication Theory 2 (4): 303–328.
Dutton, W.H. (ed.) (1996). Information and Communication Technologies – Visions and realities, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Dutton, W.H. (1999). Society on the Line: Information politics in the digital age, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Dutton, W. (2005). The Internet and Social Transformation, in W.H. Dutton, B. Kahin, R. O’Callaghan and A.W. Wyckoff (eds.) Transforming Enterprise: The economic and social implications of information technology, Cambridge, UK: MIT Press, pp. 375–398.
Dutton, W.H. (2007). ‘Through the Network (of Networks) – the Fifth Estate’, Inaugural lecture, Examination Schools, University of Oxford, 15 October.
Dutton, W.H. (2008). The Wisdom of Collaborative Network Organizations: Capturing the value of networked individuals, Prometheus 26 (3): 211–230.
Dutton, W.H. and Eynon, R. (2009). Networked Individuals and Institutions: A cross-sector comparative perspective on patterns and strategies in government and research, The Information Society 25 (3): 1–11.
Dutton, W.H. and Jeffreys, P.W. (eds.) (2010). World Wide Research: Reshaping the sciences and humanities, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Dutton, W.H. and Meyer, E.T. (2009). Experience with New Tools and Infrastructures of Research: An exploratory study of distance from and attitudes toward, e-research, Prometheus 27 (3): 223–238.
Evans, J.A. (2008). Electronic Publication and the Narrowing of Science and Scholarship, Science 321 (5887): 395–399. DOI: 10.1126/science.1150473.
Finholt, T.A. and Olson, G.M. (1997). From Laboratories to Collaboratories: A new organizational form for scientific collaboration, Psychological Science 8 (1): 28–36.
Foster, I. and Kesselman, C. (eds.) (1999). The Grid: Blueprint for a new computing infrastructure, San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Garnham, N. (1999). Information Politics: The study of communicative power, in W.H. Dutton (ed.) Society on the Line: Information politics in the digital age, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 77–78.
Hey, T., Barga, R. and Parastatidis, S. (2010). Research Platforms in the Cloud, in W.H. Dutton and P.W. Jeffreys (eds.) World Wide Research: Reshaping the sciences and humanities, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 67–71.
Hine, C.M. (2006). New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production: Understanding e-science, Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
Jeffreys, P.W. (2010). The Developing Conception of e-Research, in W.H. Dutton and P.W. Jeffreys (eds.) World Wide Research: Reshaping the sciences and humanities, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 51–66.
Jirotka, M., Procter, R., Hartswood, M., Slack, R., Simpson, A., Coopmans, C., Hinds, C. and Voss, A. (2005). Collaboration and Trust in Healthcare Innovation: The eDiaMoND case study, Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work 14 (4): 369–398.
Meyer, E.T. (2007). Technological Change and the Form of Science Research Teams: Dealing with the digitals, Prometheus 25 (4): 345–361.
Meyer, E.T. and Dutton, W.H. (2009). Top-down e-Infrastructure Meets Bottom-up Research Innovation: The social shaping of e-research, Prometheus 27 (3): 239–250.
Nentwich, M. (2003). Cyberscience: Research in the age of the internet, Vienna, Austria: Austrian Academy of Sciences.
Nielsen, M. (2011). Reinventing Discovery: How online tools are transforming science, Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
NRC (1993). National Research Council, National Collaboratories: Applying information technology for scientific research, Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Olson, G.M., Zimmerman, A. and Bos, N. (eds.) (2008). Scientific Collaboration on the Internet, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Pounds, K. (2007). Funding Changes Defy the Workings of Physics, Times Higher Education, 21 December 2007.
Richards, W.G. (2002). Virtual Screening Using Grid Computing: The screensaver project, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 1: 551–555.
Rincon, P. (2008). Astronomers given Gemini reprieve, BBC News, 12 February 2008, available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7240840.stm.
Sawyer, S. (2008). Data Wealth, Data Poverty, Science and Cyberinfrastructure, Prometheus 26 (4): 355–371.
U.S. NSF (2007). National Science Foundation, Cyberinfrastructure Vision for 21st Century Discovery, North Arlington, VA: NSF.
Von Heppel, E. (2005). Democratizing Innovation, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Wellman, B . (2001). Physical Place and Cyberplace: The rise of networked individualism, in L. Keeble, and B.D. Loader (eds.) Community Informatics, London: Routledge, pp. 17–42.
Zhu, J.J. and Li, X. (2010). Chinese e-Social Science: A low-end approach, in W.H. Dutton and P.W. Jeffreys (eds.) World Wide Research: Reshaping the sciences and humanities, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 188–190.
Acknowledgements
This article reports on research supported by the ESRC's OeSS Project Phase I (RES-149-25-1022) and II (RES-149-25-1082). Additional support was provided by the eHorizon Project, funded by a grant from the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford. I thank my colleagues on these projects, Annamaria Carusi, Paul David, Grace de la Flor, Kathryn Eccles, Paul Jeffreys, Marina Jirotka, Eric Meyer, Christopher Millard, Lucy Power, Ralph Schroeder, Tim Webmoor, Steve Woolgar and others, whose research has informed this synthesis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dutton, W. The politics of next generation research: democratizing research-centred computational networks. J Inf Technol 26, 109–119 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2011.2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2011.2