Abstract
This paper analyses the effects of investment in information technologies (IT) in the banking sector using bank-level data from a panel of 68 US banks over the period 1986–2005. Although IT can improve bank's performance by reducing operational cost (supply side), it can bring in competition among banks in order to embrace new technology (demand side). Since most empirical studies have adopted the production function approach, it is difficult to identify which effect has dominated. In a differentiated model with network effects, this paper characterizes the conditions to identify these two effects. The results suggest that (at individual firm levels) the bank profits can decline due to adoption and diffusion of IT investment, reflecting negative network competition effects in this industry. Using panel cointegration tests, we confirm that the estimated profit equation is indeed a long-run equilibrium relation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For updated data until 2006, see http://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/jorgenson/recent_work_jorgenson/html.
Computers may affect productivity because they are a specific capital input to the production process. This is the approach taken in most existing studies, including both the national and industry-level studies just cited, as well as studies at the plant or firm level, such as Brynjolfsson and Hitt (2000), Dunne et al (2000), Stolarick (1999) and McGuckin et al (1998).
See Rohlfs (1974) and Milne (2006). Also see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_effect#Benefits.
We provide the rationale for treating prices as explanatory variables in Section 2.
[0,1] can be interpreted as proportion of population. Our analysis will remain the same even if we consider population growth.
To save space, we have omitted proofs of the propositions, which are available from the authors.
The original HHI is a summation over the whole industry, but since our sample covers only 68 large banking firms, the index we calculate is not the HHI in original definition. However, we still use HHI to indicate an index for concentration.
See Shu and Strassmann (2005) for a review.
To save space, we have not presented these results, but they are available on request from the authors.
References
Bakos Y and Brynjolfsson E (1999). Bundling information goods: Pricing, profits, and efficiency. Mngt Sci 45(12): 1613–1630.
Barua A, Kriebel CH and Mukhopadhyay T (1991). An economic analysis of strategic information technology investments. MIS Quart 15(3): (Special Issue): 313–331.
Beccalli E (2007). Does IT investment improve bank performance? Evidence from Europe. J Bank Finance 31(7): 2205–2230.
Berger AN (2003). The economic effects of technological progress: Evidence from the banking industry. J Money Credit Bank 35(2): 141–176.
Bhatt G and Grover V (2005). Types of information technology capabilities and their role in competitive advantage: An empirical study. J Mngt Inform Syst 22(2): 253–277.
Brynjolfsson E and Hitt L (1996). Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Mngt Sci 42(4): 541–558.
Brynjolfsson E and Hitt LM (2000). Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. J Econ Perspect 14(4): 23–48.
Camanho AS and Dyson RG (2005). Cost efficiency, production and value-added models in the analysis of bank branch performance. J Opl Res Soc 56: 483–494.
Chen Y and Zhu J (2004). Measuring information technology's indirect impact on firm performance. Inform Technol Mngt 5(1–2): 9–22.
Chiappori PA, Perez-Castrillo D and Verdier T (1992). Spatial competition in the banking system: Localization, cross subsidies and the regulation of deposit rates. Eur Econ Rev 39: 889–918.
Cooper RB and Zmud RW (1990). Information technology implementation research: A technology diffusion approach. Mngt Sci 34(2): 123–139.
Dewan S and Kraemer KL (2000). Information technology and productivity: Evidence from country-level data. Mngt Sci 46(4): 548–562.
Dunne T, Foster L, Haltiwanger J and Troske K (2000). Wage and productivity dispersion in U.S. manufacturing: The role of computer investment. NBER Working Paper 7465.
Eyadat M and Kozak SJ (2005). The role of information technology in the profit and cost efficiency improvements of the banking sector. J Acad Bus Econ 5(2): 70–76.
Gordon RJ (2002). Technology and economic performance in the American economy. NBER Working Paper No. 8771, NBER, MA, USA.
Hotelling H (1929). Stability in competition. Econ J 39: 41–57.
Jeon Y and Miller SM (2007). Births, deaths, and marriages in the US commercial banking industry. Econ. Inquiry 45(2): 325–341.
Jorgenson D (2001). Information technology and the U.S. economy. Am Econ Rev 91(1): 1–32.
Khoury SJ and Rolland E (2006). Conceptual model for explaining the IT investment paradox in the banking sector. Int J Technol Policy Mngt 6(3): 309–326.
Loveman GW (1994). Assessing the productivity impact of information technologies. In: Allen TJ and Scott-Morton M (eds). Information Technology and the Corporation of the 1990s. Oxford University Press: New York.
McGuckin RH, Streitwieser M and Doms M (1998). The effect of technology use on productivity growth. Econ Innovat New Technol 7(1): 1–26.
Milne A (2006). What is in it for us? Network effects and bank payment innovation. J Banking Finance 30(6): 1613–1630.
Morris T (1986). Innovations in Banking. Croom Helm: London.
Oliner S and Sichel D (2000). The Resurgence of growth in the late 1990s: Is information technology the story? J Econ Perspect 14: 3–22.
Pedroni P (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bull Econ Statist 61(s1): 653–670.
Reinganum JF (1989). The timing of innovation: Research development and diffusion. In: Schmalensee R. and Willig R. (eds). Handbook of Industrial Organization :Chapter 14. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 849–908.
Rohlfs J (1974). A theory of interdependent demand for a communications service. Bell J Econ 5(1): 16–37.
Saloner G and Shepard S (1995). Adoption of technologies with network effects: An empirical examination of the adoption of automated teller machines. RAND J Econ 26(3): 479–501.
Selten R (1975). Re-examination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games. Int J Game Theory 4: 25–55.
Shao B and Shu WS (2004). Productivity breakdown of the information and computing technology industries across countries. J Opl Res Soc 55: 23–33.
Sherwood MK (1994). Difficulties in the measurement of service outputs—service industries. Monthly Labor Rev 117: 11–19.
Shu W and Strassmann PA (2005). Does information technology provide banks with profit? Inform Mngt 42(5): 781–787.
Stolarick KM (1999). Are some firms better at IT? Differing relationships between productivity and IT spending. Working Paper CES99-13, Center for Economic Studies, US Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC.
Tam KY (1998). The impact of information technology investments on firm performance and evaluation; evidence from newly industrialized economies. Inform Syst Res 9(1): 85–98.
Willcocks LP and Lester S (1997). In search of information technology productivity: Assessment issues. J Opl Res Soc 48(11): 1082–1094.
Acknowledgements
The constructive comments made by two anonymous referees of this journal are gratefully acknowledged. An earlier version of the paper was presented at the European Economics and Finance Society Annual Conference, 31 May–3 June 2007, Sofia, Bulgaria, and at the Workshop on Knowledge Flows at Queen Mary University of London, 23 March, 2007, London, UK; and we acknowledge the participants for their comments. The usual disclaimer applies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ho, S., Mallick, S. The impact of information technology on the banking industry. J Oper Res Soc 61, 211–221 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2008.128
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2008.128