Skip to main content
Log in

A network traffic flow model for motorway and urban highways

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

The research reported in this paper develops a network-level traffic flow model (NTFM) that is applicable for both motorways and urban roads. It forecasts the traffic flow rates, queue propagation at the junctions and travel delays through the network. NTFM uses sub-models associated with all road and junction types that comprise the highway. The flow at any one part of the network is obviously very dependent on the flows at all other parts of the network. To predict the two-way traffic flow in NTFM, an iterative simulation method is executed to generate the evolution of dependent traffic flows and queues. To demonstrate the capability of the model, it is applied to a small case study network and a local Loughborough–Nottingham highway network. The results indicate that NTFM is capable of identifying the relationship between traffic flows and capturing traffic phenomena such as queue dynamics. By introducing a reduced flow rate on links of the network, the effects of strategies used to carry out roadworks can be mimicked.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asphalt Industry Alliance (AIA) (2011). Annual Local Authority Road Maintenance Survey, Asphalt Industry Alliance, London, UK.

  • Breton P, Hegyi A, De Schutter B and Hellendoorn H (2002). Shock wave elimination/reduction by optimal coordination of variable speed limits. Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2002. Proceedings of the IEEE 5th International Conference, Singapore, 3–6 September, pp 225–230.

  • Brilon W, Koenig R and Troutbeck RJ (1999). Useful estimation procedures for critical gaps. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 33 (3–4): 161–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan RJ (1975). Useful headway models. Transportation Research 9 (6): 371–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cremer M and Ludwig J (1986). A fast simulation model for traffic flow on the basis of Boolean operations. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 28 (4): 297–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daganzo CF (1994). The cell transmission model—A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory. Transportation Research Part B—Methodological 28 (4): 269–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daganzo CF (1995). The cell transmission model.2. Network traffic. Transportation Research Part B—Methodological 29 (2): 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daganzo CF (1977). Traffic delay at unsignalized intersections: Clarification of some issues. Transportation Science 11 (2): 180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deflorio FP (2003). Evaluation of a reactive dynamic route guidance strategy. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 11 (5): 375–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo RJ and Lin BL (2011). Gap acceptance at priority-controlled intersections. Journal of Transportation Engineering—ASCE 137 (4): 269–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HA (2011). Traffic Information Database. Highways Agency.

  • Hegyi A, Bart De S and Hellendoorn J (2005). Optimal coordination of variable speed limits to suppress shock waves. Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE Transactions 6 (1): 102–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi A, Hegyi A, De Schutter B, Hellendoorn H and Middelham F (2004). Integration of dynamic route guidance and freeway ramp metering using model predictive control. American Control Conference, 2004. Proceedings of the 2004, Boston, June 30–July 2, pp 5533–5538.

  • Kremser H (1962). Ein Zusammengesetztes Wartezeitproblem Bei Poissonschen Verkehrsströmen (A complex problem of delay with Poisson-distributed traffic flows). Osterreichisches Ingenieur-Archiv 16, pp 231–252, Wien.

  • Kremser H (1964). Wartezeiten Und Warteschlangen Bei Einfadelung Eines Poissonprozesses in Einen Anderen Solchen Prozess (Delays and queues with one Poisson process merging into another one). Österreichisches Ingenieur-Archiv 18, pp 269–274, Wien.

  • Lighthill MJ and Whitham GB (1955). On kinematic waves. II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 229 (1178): 317–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo HK (1999). A novel traffic signal control formulation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 33 (6): 433–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo HK (2001). A cell-based traffic control formulation: Strategies and benefits of dynamic timing plans. Transportation Science 35 (2): 148–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo HK, Chang E and Chan YC (2001). Dynamic network traffic control. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 35 (8): 721–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messmer A and Papageorgiou M (1990). METANET: A macroscopic simulation program for motorway networks. Traffic Engineering and Control 31 (9): 466–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel K and Schreckenberg M (1992). A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic. Journal de Physique I 2 (12): 2221–2229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ning W (2001). A universal procedure for capacity determination at unsignalized (priority-controlled) intersections. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 35 (6): 593–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne HJ (1971). Models of freeway traffic and control. In: Bekey GA (ed) Mathematical Models of Public Systems. Vol. 1, no. 1 of Simulation Council Proceedings Series, pp 51–61, La Jolla, California.

  • Plank AW and Catchpole EA (1984). A general capacity formula for uncontrolled intersection. Traffic Engineering Control 25 (6): 327–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poeschl FJ (1983). Die Nicht Signalgesteuerte Nebenstrassenzufahrt Als Verallgemeinertes M/G/ 1- Warteschlangensystem (The unsignalized minor street entry as a generalized M/G/1 queueing system). Zeitschrift für Operations Research 27B: 91–111.

  • Richards PI (1956). Shock waves on the highway. Operations Research 4 (1): 42–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson BW et al (1999). Extensions of theoretical capacity models to account for special conditions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 33 (3–4): 217–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothery RW (1997). Car-following models. In: Gartner NH, Messer C, Rathi AK (eds). Traffic Flow Theory: A State of the Art Report—Revised Monograph on Traffic Flow Theory. Oak Ridge National Laboratory: Oak Ridge, TN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruskin HJ and Wang R (2002). Modeling traffic flow at an urban unsignalized intersection. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science—Part I, Springer-Verlag, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, April 21–24, pp 381–390.

  • Siegloch W (1973). Die Leistungsermittlung an Knotenpunkten ohne Lichtsignalsteuerung (Capacity determination at intersections without traffic signals). Schriftenreihe Strabenbau und strabenverkehrstechnik. Vol. 154, Bundesminister für Verkehr: Bonn.

  • Tanner JC (1962). A theoretical analysis of delays at an uncontrolled intersection. Biometrika 49 (1/2): 163–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian ZZ et al (2000). A further investigation on critical gap and follow-up time. Transportation Research Circular (E-C018): 4th International Symposium on Highway Capacity, Hawaii, June 27–July 1, pp 397–408.

  • Tracz M and Gondek S (2000). Use of simulation to analysis of impedance impact at unsignalized intersections. Transportation Research Circular (E-C018): 4th International Symposium on Highway Capacity, Hawaii, June 27–July 1, pp 471–484.

  • Troutbeck RJ and Brilon W (1997). Unsignalized intersection theory. In: Revised Monograph on Traffic Flow Theory, Chapter 8, Publication by Transportation Research Board, pp 1–47, http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/operations/tft/chap8.pdf.

  • Van den Berg M, Hegyi A and De Schutter B (2007). Integrated traffic control for mixed urban and freeway networks: A model predictive control approach. European Journal of Transportation and Infrastructure Research 3 (3): 223–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner C, Hoffmann C, Sollacher R, Wagenhuber J and Schürmann B (1996). Second-order continuum traffic flow model. Physical Review E 54 (5): 5073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu N (2006). A new model for estimating critical gap and its distribution at unsignalized intersections based on the equilibrium of probabilities. Proceeding of the 5th International Symposium on Highway Capacity and Quality of Service, Yokohama, Japan.

  • Yeo GF and Weesakul B (1964). Delays to road traffic at an intersection. Journal of Applied Probability 1 (2): 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

John Andrews is the Royal Academy of Engineering and Network Rail Professor of Infrastructure Asset Management. He is also Director of The Lloyd’s Register Foundation (The Lloyd's Register Foundation (The LRF) supports the advancement of engineering-related education, and funds research and development that enhances safety of life at sea, on land and in the air) Centre for Risk and Reliability Engineering at the University of Nottingham. Rasa Remenyte-Prescott is the Lloyd’s Register Foundation Lecturer in Risk and Reliability Engineering. They would both like to express their gratitude to all of these organisations for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Andrews.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, C., Remenyte-Prescott, R. & Andrews, J. A network traffic flow model for motorway and urban highways. J Oper Res Soc 65, 1278–1291 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2013.86

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2013.86

Keywords

Navigation