Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Coming to terms with the market: accounts of neoliberal failure and rehabilitation on the British Right

  • Original Article
  • Published:
British Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

Critique of “neoliberalism” is generally thought of as a preoccupation of the political Left. Here it will be argued that the British Right has also been developing a distinctive critique of neoliberalism and its failure, whether they thought about it in these precise terms or not. This represented an attempt by Conservative intellectuals to grapple with the enduring legacy of Thatcherism in the party. The objectives of this paper are threefold. Firstly, it will examine the contours of a distinctively Conservative description of neoliberal society by drawing on the work of Jesse Norman. Secondly, it will explain and contextualise their account of neoliberal economic failure and a possible avenue to its rehabilitation. And, thirdly, it will explain why this rehabilitation was itself a failure through a critique of Norman’s attempts to read Hayek through Burke. It concludes by observing that what civic forms of conservatism fail to offer is a thoroughgoing examination of functions that markets are unable to perform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This was itself a significant departure from classical liberalism: Mill was just as concerned with the ‘tyranny of the majority’ as state oppression and saw a clear role for the state in protecting minorities, such as religious non-conformists.

  2. ‘in the beginning was the Word/and the Word was with God/and the Word was God’.

References

  • Beckett, A. 2019. “A zombie party”: The deepening crisis of conservatism. The Guardian, 28 May.

  • Blond, P. 2010. Red Tory: How the left and right have broken Britain and how we can fix it. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronk, R. 2013. Hayek and the wisdom of prices: A reassessment. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 6(1): 82–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J., and G. Tullock. 1999. The collected works of James M. Buchanan, vol 3: The calculus of consent. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, E. 1999. Select works of Edmund Burke volume 4: Miscellaneous writings. Edited by F. Canavan. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

  • Burke, E. 2004. Reflections on the revolution in France. London: Penguin Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, C., E. Foster, and P. Kerr. 2012. Understanding conservative modernisation. In Cameron and the conservatives, ed. T. Heppell and D. Seawright, 16–31. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. 2005. ‘In full: Cameron victory speech’, BBC News, 6 December. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4504722.stm. Accessed 12 Mar 2020.

  • Cameron, D. 2006. ‘Leader’s Speech’. http://www.britishpoliticalspeech.org/speech-archive.htm?speech=314. Accessed 13 Sept 2018.

  • Conservative Party. 2017. Forward together: The Conservative Manifesto. conservatives.com. https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/conservative-party-manifestos/Forward%2BTogether%2B-%2BOur%2BPlan%2Bfor%2Ba%2BStronger%2BBritain%2Band%2Ba%2BMore%2BProsperous%E2%80%A6.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2019.

  • Corbett, S., and A. Walker. 2012. The Big Society: Back to the future. Political Quarterly 83(3): 487–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, S., and A. Walker. 2013. The Big Society: Rediscovery of “the social” or rhetorical fig-leaf for neo-liberalism? Critical Social Policy 33(3): 451–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, L. 2017. The secularization of providential order: F.A. Hayek’s political-economic theology. Political Theology 18(8): 660–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coote, A. 2011. Big Society and the new austerity. In The Big Society challenge, ed. M. Stott, 80–93. Cardiff: Keystone Development Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. 2014. Rethinking neoliberalism. Journal of Sociology 50(2): 150–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denver, D. 2012. The conservatives and the electorate. Cameron and the conservatives, 44–59. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dommett, K. 2015. The theory and practice of party modernisation: The conservative party under David Cameron. British Politics 10(2): 249–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorey, P., and M. Garnett. 2012. No such thing as the “Big Society”? The Conservative Party’s unnecessary search for “narrative” in the 2010 General Election. British Politics 7(4): 389–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, E., and D. Harvie. 2014. Harnessing the social: State, crisis and (big) society. Sociology 48(5): 869–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, S. 2011. Welfare reform and coalition politics in the age of austerity. In The Cameron-Clegg government, ed. S. Lee and M. Beech, 105–117. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Exley, S., and S.J. Ball. 2011. Something old, something new… understanding Conservative education policy. In The conservative party and social policy, ed. H. Bochel, 97–117. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, A. 2012. Economic policy. In Cameron and the conservatives: The transition to coalition government, ed. T. Heppell and D. Seawright, 59–73. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, A. 2015. The Thatcher myth. British Politics 10(1): 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, H. 2015. Between the state and the individual: “Big Society” communitarianism and English Conservative rhetoric. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education 14(1): 40–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halfon, R. 2012. Stop the Union-Bashing. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvie, D. 2019. (Big) society and (market) discipline: Social investment and the financialisation of social reproduction. Historical Materialism 27(1): 92–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. 1945. Knowledge in Society. American Economic Review 35(4): 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. 2006. The road to serfdom. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. 2013. Law, legislation and liberty. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayton, R. 2016. Constructing a new conservatism? Ideology and values. In David Cameron and conservative renewal: The limits of modernisation? New perspectives on the right, ed. G. Peele and J.G. Francis, 41–58. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heppell, T. 2013. Cameron and liberal conservatism: Attitudes within the parmliamentary conservative party and conservative ministers. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 14: 340–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heppell, T. 2014. The tories: From Winston Churchill to David Cameron. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickson, K. 2009. Conservatism and the poor: Conservative Party attitudes to poverty and inequality since the 1970s. British Politics 4(3): 341–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. 2016. An American Utopia: Dual power and the Universal Army. Edited by S. Žižek. London: Verso.

  • Jessop, B. 2015. Margaret Thatcher and Thatcherism: Dead but not buried. British Politics 10(1): 16–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, P., and R. Hayton. 2015. Whatever happened to Conservative Party modernisation? British Politics 10(2): 114–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kielos, K. 2009. Flight of the Swedish bumblebee. Renewal 117(2): 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, R. 2012. The Just’s umbrella: Austerity and the Big Society in Coalition policy and beyond. Critical Social Policy 32(3): 320–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lister, M. 2015. Citizens, doing it for themselves? The Big Society and Government Through Community. Parliamentary Affairs 68: 352–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Members of the One Nation Caucus. 2019. One Nation conservatism can make a success of Brexit. The Observer, 18 May. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/may/18/one-nation-conservatives-launch-declaration-values. Accessed 27 May 2019.

  • Norman, J. 2008. Compassionate economics. London: Policy Exchange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, J. 2010. The Big Society. Buckingham: University of Buckingham Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, J., and J. Ganesh. 2006. Compassionate conservatism. London: Policy Exchange.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, P. 2011. Geographies and utopias of Cameron’s Big Society. Social & Cultural Geography 12(8): 817–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. 2010. Constructions of neoliberal reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sage, D. 2012. A challenge to liberalism? The communitarianism of the Big Society and Blue Labour. Critical Social Policy 32(3): 365–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 2008. Wealth of nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M., and R. Jones. 2015. From Big Society to small state: Conservatism and the privatisation of government. British Politics 10(2): 226–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, L. 1988. Persecution and the art of writing. London: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tam, H. 2011. The big con: Reframing the state/society debate. Public Policy Research (IPPR) (March-May).

  • The Conservative and Unionist Party Manifesto. 2019. conservatives.com. https://assets-global.website-files.com/5da42e2cae7ebd3f8bde353c/5dda924905da587992a064ba_Conservative%202019%20Manifesto.pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2020.

  • Whyte, J. 2019. The invisible hand of Friedrich Hayek: Submission and spontaneous order. Political Theory 47(2): 156–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Applied Social Studies, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, LU1 3JU, UK

    Tom Hoctor

Authors
  1. Tom Hoctor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tom Hoctor.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoctor, T. Coming to terms with the market: accounts of neoliberal failure and rehabilitation on the British Right. Br Polit 16, 398–413 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-020-00141-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-020-00141-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation