Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Need, greed or opportunity? An examination of who commits benefit fraud and why they do it

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Security Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The following research article reviews the profile and motives of benefit fraudsters. Using content analysis of existing research and thematic analysis of benefit fraud interview transcripts, this article offers a better understanding of who the offenders are and their motives. The findings establish that benefit fraud is motivated by need or greed, with opportunity frequently acting as a stimulus. Empirical evidence suggests that the reasons for committing benefit fraud are wide-ranging and can be explained by a number of criminological perspectives, including strain (Merton, 1938, 1957), rational choice (Becker, 1968, 1976; Clarke and Felson, 2004), differential association (Sutherland, 1947) and social disorganisation (Shaw and McKay, 1942). The article concludes by suggesting changes to counter fraud strategies and public policy, which could reduce the level of benefit fraud.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, G. (1968) Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy 76: 169–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1976) The Economic Approach to Human Behaviour. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge, W. (1942) Social Insurance and Allied Services, Presented to Parliament by Command of His Majesty (CMND 6404), London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms, A. (2001) Compliance and community penalties. In: A. Bottoms, L. Gelsthorpe and S. Rex (eds.) Community Penalties: Change and Challenges. Cullompton, UK: Willan, pp. 87–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, K.J. and Johnson, S.D. (2003) The Role of Publicity in Crime Prevention: Findings from the Reducing Burglary Initiative, Home Office Research Study 272. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (1979) Inequality, Crime and Public Policy. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (1992) Poverty, power and white collar crime; Sutherland and the paradoxes of criminological theory. In: K. Schlegel and D. Weisburd (eds.) White Collar Crime Reconsidered. Boston, MA: North-Eastern University Press, pp. 78–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (2000) Regulation Crime Freedom. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. and Petit, C. (1990) Not Just Deserts: A Republican Theory of Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. (1996) Police research: Some critical issues. In: F. Leishman, B. Loveday and S. Savage (eds.) Core Issues in Policing. Harlow, UK: Longman, pp. 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2004) Social Research Methods, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, R.L. and Akers, R.L. (1966) A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behaviour. Social Problems 14: 128–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bursik, R.J. (1988) Social disorganization and theories of crime and delinquency: Problems and prospects. Criminology 26: 519–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, L. and Mou, S. (1995) Integrating Social Science and Ecosystem Management: A National Challenge. Darby, PA: Diane Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R.V. (ed.) (1992) Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies. New York: Harrow and Heston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R.V. and Felson, M. (2004) Introduction: Criminology, routine activity and rational choice. In: R.V. Clarke and M. Felson (eds.) Routine Activity and Rational Choice. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R.V. and Weisburd, D. (1998) Diffusion of crime control benefits: Observations on the reverse of displacement. In: R.V. Clarke (ed.) Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 2. Monsey, NJ: Criminal Justice Press, pp. 165–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloward, R. and Ohlin, L. (1960) Delinquency and Opportunity: A Theory of Delinquent Gangs. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee of Public Accounts. (2008) Progress in Tackling Benefit Fraud. London: The Stationery Office Limited. Thirty-first Report of Session 2007–08. HC323.

  • Cook, D. (1989) Rich Law, Poor Law: Different Responses to Tax and Supplementary Benefit Fraud. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. (1998) Between a rock and a hard place: The realities of working on the side. Benefits 21: 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, D.B. and Clarke, R.V. (eds.) (1986) The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, D.B. and Clarke, R.V. (1987) Understanding crime displacement: An application of rational choice theory. Criminology 24 (4): 933–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, D. (2000) Fraud Watch, 2nd edn. London: KPMG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, H. and Melrose, M. (1996) Unravelling citizenship: The significance of social security benefit fraud. Critical Social Policy, 48, 16 (3): 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, H. and Melrose, M. (1997) Manageable discord: Fraud and resistance in the social security system. Social Policy and Administration 31 (2): 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Fleur, M.L. and Quinney, R. (1966) A reformulation of Sutherland's differential association theory and a strategy for empirical verification. The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 3: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Work and Pensions. (2007) Fraud and Error in the Benefit System October 2005 to September 2006. London: Department for Work and Pensions.

  • Department for Work and Pensions. (2010a) Sanction policy: In respect of fraudulent social security benefit claims, http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/sanction-policy.pdf, accessed 5 July 2010.

  • Department for Work and Pensions. (2010b) Reducing fraud and error in the UK benefits system, http://www.theirm.org/events/documents/RoyPaul27May2010.pdf, accessed 5 July 2010.

  • Duncan, S. and Edwards, R. (1996) Lone mothers and paid work: Neighborhoods, local labor markets and welfare state regimes. Social Politics 3 (2/3): 192–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farnworth, M. and Lieber, L. (1989) Strain theory revisited: Economic goals, educational means and delinquency. American Sociological Review 54: 263–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felson, M. (2002) Crime and Everyday Life, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson, M. and Clarke, R.V. (1998) Opportunity Makes the Thief: Practical Theory for Crime Prevention. London: Home Office. Police research Paper 98.

  • Fitzpatrick, T. (2000) Critical cyberpolicy: Network technologies, massless citizens, virtual rights. Critical Social Policy 20 (3): 375–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, D. (2007) Reducing Dependency, Increasing Opportunity: Options for the Future of Welfare to Work. Leeds, UK: Department for Work and Pensions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, D. (ed.) (1988) Employment, unemployment and social stratification. Employment in Britain. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 465–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabiner, L. (2000) The Informal Economy: A Report by Lord Grabiner QC. London: HM Treasury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, C. (2005) Advertising social security Fraud. Benefits 13 (44): 199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessing, D.J., Elffers, H., Robben, H.S.J. and Webley, P. (1993) Needy or greedy? The social psychology of individuals who fraudulently claim unemployment benefits. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 23 (3): 226–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (2002) Causes of Delinquency. London: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ipsos MORI Social Research Institute (2006) Targeting Benefit Fraud: Research Study Conducted for the DWP. London: MORI.

  • Jordan, B. and Redley, M. (1994) Polarisation, underclass and the welfare state. Work, Employment and Society 8 (2): 153–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katungi, D., Neale, E. and Barber, A. (2006) People in Low Paid Informal Work: Need Not Greed. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempson, E. (1996) Life on a Low Income. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laycock, G. (1991) Operation identification or the power of publicity? Security Journal 2 (2): 67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, M. (1998) The long term unemployed, informal economic activity and the ‘underclass’ in Belfast: Rejecting or reinstating the work ethic. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 22 (1): 42–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. (1994) Masculinity and white collar crime. In: T. Newburn and B. Stanko (eds.) Just Boys Doing Business. London: Routledge, pp. 234–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. (1998) Prevention of Plastic Card Fraud, Research Findings Number 71. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. (2008) Combating identity and other forms of payment Fraud in the UK: An analytical history. In: M. McNally and G. Newman (eds.) Perspectives on Identity Theft, Crime Prevention Studies, Vol. 23. Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing, pp. 111–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M., Burrows, J., Fleming, M.H. and Hopkins, M. (with the assistance of Matthews K.) (2007) The Nature, Extent and Economic Impact of Fraud in the UK. London: ACPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. and Handley, J. (2002) Criminal Justice and the Future of Credit Card Fraud. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linderman, A. (2007) Computer content analysis and manual coding techniques: A comparative analysis. In: M.D. West (ed.) Theory, Method and Practice in Computer Content Analysis. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing, pp. 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, R. (1994) Fiddly jobs and the something for nothing society. Work, Employment and Society 8 (4): 507–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeever, G. (1999a) Detecting, prosecuting and punishing benefit fraud: The Social Security Administration (Fraud) Act 1997. The Modern Law Review 62 (2): 261–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeever, G. (1999b) Fighting fraud: An evaluation of the government's social security fraud strategy. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 21 (4): 357–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKibbin, R. (1997) Very Old Labour, London Review of Books, 3 April, pp. 3–6.

  • McLaughlin, E., Millar, J. and Cooke, K. (1989) Work and Welfare Benefits. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K. (1938) Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review 3 (5): 672–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K. (1957) Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K. (1995) Opportunity structure: The emergence, diffusion and differentiation of a sociological concept. In: F. Adler and W.S. Laufer (eds.) The Legacy of Anomie Theory, Advances in Criminological Research, Vol. 6. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, pp. 3–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C. (1990) The Emerging Underclass. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Audit Office. (2006) International Benchmark of Fraud and Error in Social Security Systems. London: The Stationery Office. Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General. HC 1387, Session 2005–2006.

  • National Audit Office. (2008) Department for Work and Pensions: Progress in Tackling Benefit Fraud. London: The Stationery Office. Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General. HC102, Session 2007–2008.

  • National Fraud Authority. (2010) Annual Fraud Indicator. London: National Fraud Authority, http://www.attorneygeneral.gov.uk/nfa/GuidetoInformation/Documents/NFA_fraud_indicator.pdf, accessed 6 May 2010.

  • Neuendorf, K. (2002) The Content Analysis Guide Book. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newburn, T. (2007) Criminology. Cullompton, UK: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, R. and Burnard, P. (2006) Vital Notes for Nurses: Research for Evidence Based Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, R.E. (1952) Human Communities. Glencoe: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfohl, S.J. (1985) Images of Deviance and Social Construction. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radzinowicz, L. and King, J. (1977) The Growth of Crime: The International Experience. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N. (1977) Methodological Pragmatism: A Systems-theoretic Approach to the Theory of Knowledge. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, C. (2002) Real World Research, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowlingson, K., Whyley, C., Newburn, T. and Bertoud, R. (1997) Social Security Fraud: The Role of Penalties. London: HMSO. Social Security Research Report Number 64.

  • Sainsbury, R. (1998) The missing half billion: Getting the real measure of fraud. Disability Rights Bulletin, Summer: 4–6.

  • Sainsbury, R. (2003) Understanding social security fraud. In: J. Millar (ed.) Understanding Social Security: Issues for Policy and Practice. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press, pp. 277–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, C. and McKay, H. (1942) Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheptyki, J. (1994) It looks different from the outside. Policing 10: 125–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slapper, G. and Tombs, S. (1999) Corporate Crime. Harlow, UK: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Security Committee. (1996) Third Report: Housing Benefit Fraud. London: The Stationery Office. HC 90 – I.

  • Stockdale, J.E. and Gresham, P.J. (1995) Combating Burglary: An Evaluation of Three Strategies. London: Home Office. Crime Detection and Prevention Series, Paper 59.

  • Sutherland, E. (1947) Principles of Criminology, 4th edn. New York: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I., Walton, P. and Young, J. (1973) The New Criminology: For a Social Theory of Deviance. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Travers, A. (2001) Prospects for Enterprise: An Investigation into the Motivations of Workers in the Informal Economy. London: Community Links. Community Links Evidence Paper No. 2.

  • Tunnell, K. (1991) Choosing Crime: The Criminal Calculus of Property Offences. Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, E.J., Campbell, D.T., Schwarz, R.D. and Sechrest, L. (1966) Unobtrusive Measures: Non-reactive Measures in the Social Sciences. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, S.J. (1997) Conflict of interest and financial disclosure: Judge the science not the author. Chest 112 (4): 865–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. (2005) Tackling the informal economy: Towards a co-ordinated public policy approach. Public Policy and Administration 2 (2): 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, F., Popay, J. and Oakley, A. (eds.) (1999) Welfare Research: A Critical Review. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks the DWP for allowing access to data, and the anonymous reviewers of this journal.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Applied Criminology, Birmingham City University, 417 Franchise Street, Birmingham, B42 2SU, UK

    Martin Tunley

Authors
  1. Martin Tunley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tunley, M. Need, greed or opportunity? An examination of who commits benefit fraud and why they do it. Secur J 24, 302–319 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2010.5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2010.5

Keywords

Search

Navigation