Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Reintegrating women leaving jail into urban communities: A description of a model program

  • Special Feature: Continuity of Care from Corrections to Community
  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Women are the fastest-growing population in the criminal justice system, and jails reach more people than any other component of the correctional system. About 1 million women pass through US jails each year. Most return to their communities within a few weeks of arrest, and few receive help for the substance abuse, health, psychological or social problems that contribute to incarceration. We describe a model program, Health Link, designed to assist drug-using jailed women in New York City to return to their communities, reduce drug use and HIV risk behavior, and avoid rearrest. The program operates on four levels: direct services, including case management for individual women in the jail and for 1 year after release; technical assistance, training, and financial support for community service providers that serve ex-offenders; staff support for a network of local service providers that coordinate services and advocate for resources: and policy analysis and advocacy to identify and reduce barriers to successful community reintegration of women released from jail. We describe the characteristics of 386 women enrolled in Health Link in 1997 and 1998; define the elements of this intervention; and assess the lessons we have learned from 10 years of experience working with jailed women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Currie E.Crime and Punishment in America: Why the Solutions to America's Most Stubborn Social Crisis Have Not Worked—and What Will. New York: Henry Holt and Company; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bonczar T, Beck A.Lifetime Likelihood of Going to State or Federal Prison. Washington, DC: US Bureau of Justice Statistics; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bennett WJ, Dilulio J, Walters J.Body Count, Moral Poverty and How to Win America's War Against Crime and Drugs. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Caulkins J, Rydell P, Schwabe W, Chiesa J.Mandatory Minimum Drug Sentences: Throwing Away the Key or the Taxpayers Money? Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tonry M.Malign Neglect—Race, Crime and Punishment in America. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kerle KE.American Jails Looking to the Future. Boston: Butterworth-Heineman; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bureau of Justice Statistics.Women Offenders: Special Report. Washington, DC: US Dept of Justice; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Singer M, Bussey J, Song L, Lunghofer L. The psychological issues of women serving time in jail.Social Work. 1995;40:103–113.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mauer M, Potler C, Wolf R.Gender and Justice: Women, Drugs and Sentencing Policy. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Henderson DJ. Drug abuse and incarcerated women: a research review.J Subst Abuse Treat. 1998;15:579–587.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Waterston A.Street Addicts in the Political Economy. Philadelphia: Temple; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Browne A, Miller B, Maguin E. Prevalence and severity of lifetime physical and sexual victimization among incarcerated women.Int J Law Psychiatry. 1999;22:301–322.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Morash M, Bynum TS, Koons BA.Women Offenders: Programming Needs and Promising Approaches. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Prendergast ML, Wellisch J, Falkin G. Assessment of and services for substance-abusing women offenders in community and correctional settings.Prison J. 1995;75:240–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Taylor SD. Women offenders and reentry issues.J Psychoactive Drugs. 1996;28:85–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wellisch J, Anglin MD, Prendergast ML. Treatment strategies for drug-abusing women offenders. In: Incardi J, ed.Drug Treatment and Criminal Justice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1993:5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Benson B, Rasmussen D.Independent Policy Report: Illicit Drugs and Crime. Oakland, CA: The Independent Institute; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Islambert C. The women of cell block B: chains of violence.Harvard Magazine. 1999; 101:25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gilliard DK.Prison and Jail Inmates at Midyear 1998. Washington, DC: US Dept of Justice; 1999:1–11. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin NCJ173414.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Peters RH, Strozier AL, Murrin MR, Kearns WD. Treatment of substance-abusing jail inmates: examination of gender differences.J Subst Abuse Treat. 1997;4:339–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Blank S, McDonnell DD, Rubin SR. New approaches to syphilis control: finding opportunities for syphilis treatment and congenital syphilis prevention in a women's correctional setting.Sex Transm Dis. 1997;24:218–226.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bond L, Semaan S. At risk for HIV infection: incarcerated women in a county jail in Philadelphia.Women Health. 1996;24:27–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hammett TM, Harmon P, Maruschak LM.1996–1997 Update: HIV/AIDS, STDs, and TB in Correctional Facilities. Washington, DC: US Dept of Justice; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  24. National Institute of Justice.Annual Report on Drug Use Among Adult and Juvenile Arrestees. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  25. National Institute of Justice.Annual Report on Opiate Use Among Arrestees. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Richie BE.Compelled to Crime: the Gender Entrapment of Battered Black Women. New York: Routledge; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Richie BE, Johnsen C. Abuse histories among newly incarcerated women in a New York City jail.J Am Women's Med Assoc. 1996;51:111–114.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Teplin LA, Abram KM, McClelland GM. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among incarcerated women.Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996;53:505–512.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bureau of Justice Statistics.Women in Prison: Special Report. Washington, DC: US Dept of Justice; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Donziger SR.The Real War on Crime: the Report of the National Criminal Justice Commission. New York: Harper-Collins; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mishel L, Bernstein J, Schmitt J.The State of Working America 1998–1999. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kozol J.Savage Inequalities. New York: Crown Publishers; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Panel on High Risk Youth.Losing Generations of Adolescents in High-Risk Settings. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  34. US Department of Housing and Urban Development.State of the Cities—1999. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Halpern R.Rebuilding the Inner City: a History of Neighborhood Initiatives to Address Poverty in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Grasmick H, Blackwell BS, Bursik RJ, Mitchell S. Changes in perceived threats of shame, embarrassment, and legal sanctions for interpersonal violence, 1982–1992.Violence Victims. 1993;8:313–325.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Drucker E. Drug prohibition.Public Health Rep. 1999;114:14–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Currie E.Reckoning Drugs, the Cities and the American Future. New York: Hill and Wang; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bonta J, Pang B, Wallace-Capretta S. Predictors of recidivism among incarcerated female offenders.Prison J. 1995;75:277–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Reinarman C, Levine HG.Crack in america: Demon Drugs and Social Justice. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wallerstein N. Powerlessness, empowerment and health: Implications for health promotion programs.Am J Health Promotion. 1992;6:197–205.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Coleman JS.Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Putnam RD.Bowling Alone: the Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Stokols D. Establishing and maintaining health environments: towards a social ecology of health promotion.Am Psychol. 1992;47:6–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Veysey BM, Steadman H, Morrissey JP, Johnsen M. In search of missing linkages: continuity of care in US jails.Behav Sci Law. 1997;15:383–397.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Belenko S. The challenges of integrating drug treatment into the criminal justice process.Albany Law Rev. 2000;63:833–876.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Freudenberg N, Wilets I, Greene MB, Richie BE. Linking women in jail to community services: factors associated with rearrest and retention of drug-using women following release from jail.J Am Med Women's Assoc. 1998;53:89–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Gray TG, Mays L, Stohr MK. Inmate needs and programming in exclusively women's jails.Prison J., 1995;75:186–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Rhodes W, Gross M.Case Management Reduces Drug Use and Criminality Among Drug-Involved Arrestees: an Experimental Study of an HIV Prevention Intervention. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice and National Institute of Drug Abuse; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse.Behind Bars: Substance Abuse and America's Prison Population. New York, Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse: 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Gerstein DR, Harwood HJ.Treating Drug Problems. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Hammett, TM, Gaiter J, Crawford C. Reaching seriously at-risk populations: health interventions in criminal justice settings.Health Educ Behav. 1998;25:99–120.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Steadman HE, Veysey BM.Providing Services for Jail Inmates With Mental Disorders. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Barr H.Prisons and Jails: Hospitals of Last Resort. The Need for Diversion and Discharge Planning for Incarcerated People with Mental Illness in New York New York: Correctional Association of New York and Urban Justice Center; 1999. Available at: www.soros.org/crime/MIReport.htm. Accessed January 16, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hanke PJ, Faupel CE. Women opiate users' perceptions of treatment services in New York City.J Subst Abuse Treat. 1993;10:513–522.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Marsh JC, Miller NA. Female clients in substance abuse treatment.Int J Addict. 1985; 20:995–1019.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Reed BG. Drug misuse and dependency in women: the meaning and implications of being considered a special population or minority group.Int J Addict. 1985;20:13–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Leh SK. HIV infection in US correctional systems: its effect on the community.J Community Health Nurs. 1997;16:53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Office of National Drug Control Policy.Drugs, Alcohol Abuse and the Criminal Offender Breaking the Cycle—Breaking Free of the Cycle: Policy for Community and Institutional Interventions to Safeguard Public Safety and Restore Public Health. Washington, DC: Office of National Drug Control Policy; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  60. New York City Department of Correction.Statistics and Charts. New York: New York City Department of Correction; 1999. Available at: www.ci.nyc.ny.us/html/doc/html/docstats.html. Accessed January 16, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  61. McCord C, Freeman H. Excess mortality in Harlem.New Engl J Med. 1990;322:173–178.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Kozol J.Amazing Grace: the Lives of Children and the Conscience of a Nation. New York: Crown; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Freudenberg N, Trinadad U. The role of community organizations in responding to the AIDS epidemic in two Latino neighborhoods in New York City.Health Educ Q. 1992; 19:219–232.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Freudenberg N.Health Link: Description of a Model Program to Reduce Substance Abuse and Recidivism. New York: Hunter College on AIDS, Drugs and Community Health; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Healey KM.Case Management in the Criminal Justice System. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Martin S, Inciardi J. Case management approaches for the criminal justice client. In: Inciardi J ed.Drug Treatment and Criminal Justice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Falck RS, Seigal HA, Carlson RG. Case management to enhance AIDS risk reduction for injection drug users and crack cocaine users: practical and philosophical consideration.Progress and Issues in Case Management. 1992;127:167–180.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Bokos P, Mejta CL, Mickenberg JH, Monks RL.Case Management: an Alternative Approach to Working With Intravenous Drug Users. Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Simpson DD, Joe GW, Rowan-Szal GA, Greener JM. Drug abuse treatment process components that improve retention.J Subst Abuse Treat. 1997;14:565–572.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Fiorentine R, Anglin MD. Client engagement in drug treatment.J Subst Abuse Treat. 1999;17:199–206.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Broome KM, Knight DK, Hiller ML, Simpson DD. Drug treatment process indicators for probationers and prediction of recidivism.J Subst Abuse Treat. 1996;13:481–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Hien D, Hien NM. Women, violence with intimates, and substance abuse: relevant theory, emprical findings, and recommendations for future research.Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1998;24:419–438.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Physician Leadership on National Drug Policy.New Studies Find Drug Courts and Drug Treatment of Prisoners, Parolees and Teens Cut Crime and Drug Use. Washington, DC: Physician Leadership on National Drug Policy; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Bernstein J, Houston E.Crime and Work: What We Can Learn From the Low-Wage Labor Market. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute; 2000

    Google Scholar 

  75. Western B, Beckett K. How unregulated is the US labor market? The penal system as a labor market institution.Am J Sociol. 1999;104:1030–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Leukefeld CG, Tims FM.Compulsory Treatment of Drug Abuse: Research and Clinical Practice. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Illinois, Chicago

    Beth E. Richie (Associate Professor of Criminal Justice Studies and Women's Studies)

  2. Hunter College, City University of New York, 425 East 25th Street, 10010, New York, NY

    Nicholas Freudenberg (Professor and Director of Urban Public Health)

  3. Fortune Society, 425 East 25th Street, 10010, New York, NY

    Joanne Page (Executive Director)

Authors
  1. Beth E. Richie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicholas Freudenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joanne Page
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Freudenberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richie, B.E., Freudenberg, N. & Page, J. Reintegrating women leaving jail into urban communities: A description of a model program. J Urban Health 78, 290–303 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/78.2.290

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/78.2.290

Keywords

Search

Navigation