Abstract
The determination of preliminary orbits of celestial bodies is of interest to observational astronomy in terms of discovering new bodies or identifying them with already known ones. The solution of this problem requires methods that are not limited both by the eccentricity of the orbit and by the time intervals between observations. This article considers the Cauchy–Kuryshev–Perov geometric method for determining a preliminary orbit. It is shown how to determine an orbit that does not lie in the observer’s plane of motion within the two-body problem, based only on geometric constructions, and using five angular observations. This method makes it possible to reduce the problem of determining a preliminary orbit to the algebraic system of equations relative to two dimensionless variables with a finite number of solutions. The method is suitable for determining both elliptical and hyperbolic orbits. It has no restrictions on the length of the orbital arc of the observed body and is not limited by the number of complete revolutions around the attractive center between observations. All possible combinations of positions of the body in the orbit are divided into 64 variants and described by the corresponding systems of equations. This article presents an algorithm for finding solutions to the problem without having prior information about the desired orbit. The solutions are sought in a bounded region in which triangulations are performed with triangles ranked according to the search conditions, thus eliminating the consideration of most of them at the initial stage. The solutions of the system are found by the Nelder–Mead method through the search for minima of the target function. The obtained orbits are compared by means of a representation of observations, and the best one is selected. An example of determining the orbit of the comet 2I/Borisov is given.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
V. B. Kuznetsov, “Using the Kuryshev–Perov geometrical method for determination of asteroid and comet orbits,” in Near-Earth Astronomy — 2015: Proc. Int. Conf., Terskol, Russia, Aug. 31 – Sept. 5, 2015 (Moscow, 2015), pp. 51–57.
A. Cauchy, “Mémoire sur deux formules générales dont chacune permet de calculer rapidement des valeurs très approchées des éléments de l’orbite d’une planète ou d’une comète,” C. R. 25, 953 (1847). http://sites.mathdoc.fr/cgi-bin/oetoc?id=OE_CAUCHY_1_10
P. Harzer, “Über eine geometrische Methode zur Bahnbestimmung der Bahnen von Himmelskorper aus fünf Beobachtungen,” A. N. 184 (1910);
Publ. Sterwar., Kiel 12 (1910).
M. A. Vil’ev, “Studies on the number of solutions to the main problem of theoretical astronomy in connection with its general position at the present time,” Tr. AO LGU, Ser. Mat. Nauk (Astron.) 5 (27), 81–256 (1938).
V. I. Kuryshev and N. I. Perov, “A nontraditional means of determining the orbital elements of unknown cosmic objects from the data of computer processing of survey photographs,” Sov. Astron. 26, 727–729 (1982).
V. B. Kuznetsov, “Revisiting the determination of a preliminary orbit for a celestial body,” Sol. Syst. Res. 53, 462–472 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0038094619060054
K. Stumpff, Himmelsmechanik (Deutscher Verlag, Berlin, 1959), Vol. 1.
A. J. Sarnecki, “A projective approach to orbit determination from three sight-lines,” Celestial Mech. Dyn. Astron. 66, 425–451 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00049380
C. Fong, “Analytical methods for squaring the disc,” in Proc. Seoul ICM 2014 Satellite Conference on Imaging, Multi-Scale and High-Contrast Partial Differential Equations, Daejeon, Korea, Aug. 7–9, 2014 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 2014).
V. I. Shalashilin and E. B. Kuznetsov, Parametric Continuation and Optimal Parametrization in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (URSS, Moscow, 2003; Springer, Dordrecht, 2003).
A. S. Samotokhin and Z. N. Khutorovsky, “Method for initial determination of parameters of near-Earth orbits based on three angular observations,” Preprint No. 44, IPM RAN (Keldysh Inst. of Applied Mathematics, Moscow, 2014).
J. A. Nelder and R. Mead, “Simplex method for function minimization,” Comput. J. 7, 308–313 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308
D. M. Himmelblau, Applied Nonlinear Programming (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1972; Mir, Moscow, 1975).
V. Potemkin, “Programming language Fortran” (2005). http://fortran90.pvbk.spb.ru/min.html#FM28. Accessed September 10, 2021.
O. B. Arushanyan, “Scientific and educational Internet resource of the Research Computing Center of Moscow State University on numerical analysis” (2006). http://numanal.srcc.msu.ru/lib_na/cat/mn/mnb6r.htm. Accessed September 10, 2021.
International Astronomical Union, “Minor Planet Center 2I/Borisov = C/2019 Q4 (Borisov)” (2020). https://minorplanetcenter.net/db_search/show_object?utf8=%E2%9C%93&object_id=2I. Accessed September 10, 2021.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
To cite this work: Kuznetsov V.B. “Determination of a Preliminary Orbit by the Cauchy–Kuryshev–Perov Geometrical Method,” Vestnik of St. Petersburg University. Mathematics. Mechanics. Astronomy, 2021, vol. 8(66), no. 4, pp. 716–727. (In Russian.) https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu01.2021.417.
Additional information
Translated by O. Pismenov
About this article
Cite this article
Kuznetsov, V.B. Determination of a Preliminary Orbit by the Cauchy–Kuryshev–Perov Geometric Method. Vestnik St.Petersb. Univ.Math. 54, 452–460 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063454121040117
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063454121040117