Skip to main content
Log in

The results of an assessment of the ecological state of zoobenthos communities according to the difference of evenness index (D E′ )

  • Zooplankton, Zoobenthos, and Zooperiphyton
  • Published:
Inland Water Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The difference of the evenness index (D E′ ) is offered for an assessment of the ecological state of zoobenthos communities. The index is deduced on the basis of the Shannon indexes calculated according to abundance and biomass data and differentiates between these informational estimations (Shannon diversity) of evenness of species in any given community. Conclusions made by Pianka about the predomination of organisms with r and K life strategy in communities impacted and unimpacted by ecological stress, as well as the ABC-curves method suggested by Warwick, were used as the basis of the functioning mechanism for the suggested index. The examples of index applicability are demonstrated by an assessment of materials collected in freshwater, estuarine, and marine waterbodies during one-time surveys and long-term monitoring observations. The results are compared with zoobenthos assessments made on the basis of some other indexes. Conclusions concerning the efficiency of the D E′ have been made and some of its advantages over other indexes are shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alimov, A.F., Elementy teorii funktsionirovaniya vodnykh ekosistem (Elements of the Theory of Aquatic Ecosystem Functioning), St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alimov, A.F., Biological Diversity and the Community Structure of Organisms, Inland Water Biol., 2010, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 207–213. Doi: 10.1134/S1995082910030016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bakanov, A.I., Quantitative Assessment of Dominance in Ecological Communities, IBVV AN SSSR, 1987, p. 63. Deposited in VINITI December 8, 1987, No. 8593-B87

    Google Scholar 

  4. Balushkina, E.V., The Use of Integrated Index for Water Quality Assessment by the Structural Characteristics of Benthic Communities, in Reaktsiya ozernykh ekosistem na izmenenie bioticheskikh i abioticheskikh uslovii (Lake Ecosystem Response to Changes in Biotic and Abiotic Conditions), St. Petersburg: Zool. Ins. RAN, 1997, vol. 272, pp. 266–292.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Denisenko, N.V. and Denisenko, S.G., Characteristics of Distribution of Sublittoral Zoobenthos in Bays and Gulfs of the White, Barents, and Kara Seas, in Mater. Gidroekol. S”ezda Ukrainy (Proc. Hydroecological Congress of Ukraine), Vol. 2: Morskaya gidrobiologiya. Gidroecologiya (Marine Hydrobiology and Hydroecology), Feodosiya, 2005, pp. 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Denisenko, S.G., Shannon’s Information Measure and Its Use in Assessments of Biodiversity (As Exemplified D E D E by Marine Benthos), in Issledovaniya fauny morei (Studies of Fauna of the Seas), St. Petersburg, 2006, vol. 56(64), pp. 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zenkevich, L.A. and Brotskaya, V.A., Data on Environmental Management Forms of the Barents Sea, Uch. Zap. MGU, Zoologiya, 1937, no. 13, pp. 203–226.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Protasov, A.A., Bioraznoobrazie i ego otsenka. Kontseptual’naya diversikologiya (Biodiversity and Its Assessment. Conceptual Diversicology), Kiev: Akademperiodika NAN Ukrainy, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Raspopov, I.M., Andronikova, I.N., Barbashova, M.A., et al., Long-Term Monitoring of the Formation of Biota in the Place of an Ecosystem Destroyed by Wastewaters of Pulp and Paper Production (Gulf Shchuchii, Lake Ladoga), in Okhrana i ratsional’noe ispol’zovanie vodnykh resursov Ladozhskogo ozera i drugikh bol’shikh ozer: Tr. IV Mezhdunar. simp. po Ladozhskomu ozeru (Protection and Sustainable Use of Water Resources of Lake Ladoga and Other Large Lakes, Proc. IV Int. Symp. on Lake Ladoga), St. Petersburg, 2003, pp. 338–342.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rukovodstvo po metodam analiza poverkhnostnykh vod i donnykh otlozhenii (Manual of Methods of Analysis of Surface Water and Sediments), Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1983, p. 240.

  11. Khlebovich, V.V., Kriticheskaya solenost’ biologicheskikh protsessov (Critical Salinity of Biological Processes), Leningrad: Nauka, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sharapova, T.A., Periphyton Fauna of Watercourses of Southern Yamal, in Prirodnaya sreda Yamala (Natural Environment of Yamal), Tyumen: IPOS SO RAN, 2000, pp. 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yakovlev, V.A., Otsenka kachestva poverkhnostnykh vod Kol’skogo Severa po gidrobiologicheskim pokazatelyam i dannym biotestirovaniya (prakticheskie rekomendatsii) (Quality Assessment of Surface Waters of the Kola Peninsula by Hydrobiological Indices and Bioassay Data: Practical recommendations), Apatity: Izd. Kol’sk. Fil. AN SSSR, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Anisimova, N.A., Lubin, P.A., and Manushin, I.E., Quantitative Large-Scale Benthic Survey of the Barents Sea 2003–2008, in Mapping and monitoring of benthos in the Barents Sea and Svalbard Waters: Results from the Joint Russian-Norwegian Benthic Programme, 2006–2008. IMR-PINRO Joint Report Series 1-2010, 2010, ISSN 1502-8828, pp. 55–81.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Beukema, J.J., An Evolution of the ABC-Method (Abundance/Biomass Comparison) as Applied to Macrozoobenthic Communities Living in Tidal Flats in the Dutch Wadden Sea, Mar. Biol. (Berlin), 1988, vol. 99, pp. 425–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Clarke, K.R., Comparisons of Dominance Curves, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 1990, vol. 138, pp. 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Denisenko, S.G., Structurally-Functional Characteristics of the Barents Sea Zoobenthos, Proc. Zool. Inst. RAS, 2004, vol. 300, pp. 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fisher, R.A., Corbet, A.S., and Williams, C.B., The Relation between the Number of Species and the Number of Individuals in a Random Sample of Animal Population, Okeanologiya, 1943, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 42–58.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kratochwil, A., Biodiversity in Ecosystems: Some Principles, in Biodiversity in Ecosystems; Principles and Case Studies of Different Complexity Levels, Dordrecht: Kluwer Acad. Publ., 1999, pp. 5–38.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. MacArthur, R.H., On the Relative Abundance of Bird Species, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1957, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 293–295.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Magurran, E.A., Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement, London: Croom Helm, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  22. McLusky, D.S., The Estuarine Ecosystem, Glasgow: Vlackie, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  23. McManus, J.W. and Pauly, D., Measuring Ecological Stress: Variations on a Theme by R.M. Warwick, Mar. Biol. (Berlin), 1990, vol. 106, pp. 305–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Motomura, I., Etude Statistique des Populations Ecologiques, Doobutugaku Zassi (Tokyo), 1932, vol. 44, pp. 379–383.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pavluk, T., Minin, A., and Pavluk, E., Influence of Single Pollutants on Macroinvertebrates in National Streams. Phase III: Manganese, Zink and Suspended Solids, RIZA Report, 2004, no. 22004.062X.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pearson, T.H., The Benthic Ecology of Loch Linnhe and Loch Eil, a Sea-Loch System of the West Coast of Scotland. IV. Changes in the Benthic Fauna Attributable to Organic Enrichment, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 1975, vol. 20, pp. 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pianka, E.R.V., On r and K Selection, Am. Nat., 1970, vol. 104, pp. 592–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pielou, E.C., An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology, New York: Wiley, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Preston, F.W., The Commonness and Rarity of Species, Ecology, 1948, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 254–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shannon, C.E., A Mathematical Theory of Communication, Bell Syst. Tech. J., 1948, vol. 27, pp. 623–656.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shaw, K.M., Lambshead, P.J.D., and Platt, H.M., Detection of Pollution Induced Disturbance in Marine Benthic Assemblages with Special Reference to Nematodes, Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser., 1983, vol. 11, pp. 195202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Warwick, R.M., A New Method for Detecting Pollution Effects on Marine Macrobenthos Communities, Mar. Biol. (Berlin), 1986, vol. 92, pp. 557–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Warwick, R.M. and Clarke, K.R., A Comparison of Methods for Analyzing Changes in Benthic Community Structure, J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K., 1991, vol. 71, pp. 225–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wittaker, R.H., Communities and Ecosystems, New York: Macmillan, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Woodiwiss, F.S., The Biological System of Stream Classification Used by the Trent River Board, Chem. Industry, 1964, vol. 11, pp. 443–447.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © S.G. Denisenko, M.A. Barbashova, V.V. Skvortsov, V.P. Belyakov, E.A. Kurashov, 2013, published in Biologiya Vnutrennikh Vod, 2013, No. 1, pp. 46–55.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Denisenko, S.G., Barbashova, M.A., Skvortsov, V.V. et al. The results of an assessment of the ecological state of zoobenthos communities according to the difference of evenness index (D E′ ). Inland Water Biol 6, 39–47 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995082912040062

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995082912040062

Keywords

Navigation