Abstract
The study is based on the idea of plurality of spatial equilibrium and hypotheses of agglomeration economies. The spatial concentration indices are analyzed and econometric estimates are given. It is shown that evolution of the spatial distribution of economic activity in Russia is moving toward its concentration. Obviously, the spatial model of development is changing to a new one, which is characterized by a higher concentration of economic activity and, consequently, a higher level of interregional heterogeneity. Noticeable reallocation of production and output factors from East to West is not observed. It has been concluded that Russian regional policy aimed at supporting “points of growth” and “priority areas of development” is ineffective at present. Due to agglomeration mechanisms, territories with a growing economy can improve the dynamics of their development on their own, without state support. Agglomeration processes occur throughout Russia; their speed is only slightly lower in the East. At a time when interregional competition dominates cooperation, spatial externalities are negative, and government regulation focused on the support of dynamic economies can lead to further polarization. Regional policy aimed at smoothing differences between regions is a more sensible choice. An additional argument in its favor is federal restrictions in the form of a state system and threat of separatism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gaddy, C.G. and Hill, F., The Siberian Curse: How Communist Planners Left Russia Out in the Cold, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2003.
Clayton, E. and Richardson, T., Soviet control of city size, Econ. Dev. Cult. Change, 1989, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 155–165.
Combes, P.P., Mayer, T., and Thisse, J.F., Economic Geography: The Integration of Regions and Nations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 2008.
Davis, D. and Weinstein, D., Bones, bombs, and break points: the geography of economic activity, Am. Econ. Rev., 2002, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 1269–1289.
Davis, D. and Weinstein, D., A search for multiple equilibrium in urban industrial structure, J. Reg. Sci., 2008, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 29–65.
Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., and Schramm, M., The strategic bombing of German cities during World War II and its impact on city growth, J. Econ. Geogr., 2004, no. 4, pp. 201–208.
Miguel, E. and Roland, G., The long-run impact of bombing Vietnam, J. Dev. Econ., 2001, no. 96, pp. 1–15.
Bosker, M., Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., and Schramm, M., Looking for multiple equilibrium when geography matters: German city growth and the WWII shock, J. Urban Econ., 2007, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 152–169.
Redding, S., Sturm, D., and Wolf, N., History and industry location: evidence from German airports, Rev. Econ. Stat., 2011, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 814–831.
AutoTransInfo, The Russian largest freight exchange web site. http://www.ati.su/en/Trace/default.aspx. Cited May 12, 2014.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © E.A. Kolomak, 2014, published in Region: Ekonomika i Sotsiologiya, 2014, No. 3 (83), pp. 75–93.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kolomak, E.A. Evolution of spatial distribution of economic activity in Russia. Reg. Res. Russ. 5, 236–242 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970515030065
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970515030065