Abstract
This study investigates the potential of supersaturated self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems (super-SNEDDS) to improve the bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs compared to conventional SNEDDS. Conventional SNEDDS contained simvastatin (SIM) at 75% of the equilibrium solubility (S eq). Super-SNEDDS containing SIM at 150 and 200% of S eq were produced by subjecting the SNEDDS preconcentrates to a heating and cooling cycle. The super-SNEDDS were physically stable over 10 months. During in vitro lipolysis of SNEDDS and super-SNEDDS the SIM concentration in the aqueous phase increased for the first 30 min almost proportional to the drug loads and amounts of preconcentrate employed. The 200% drug-loaded super-SNEDDS generated an amorphous SIM precipitate at the end of in vitro lipolysis. In vivo, the relative bioavailability of SIM from super-SEDDDS increased significantly to 180 ± 53.3% (p = 0.014) compared to the dosing of two capsules of (dose equivalent) 75% drug-loaded SNEDDS. A significant increase in the terminal half-life of elimination was observed for super-SNEDDS (2.3 ± 0.6 h) compared to conventional SNEDDS (1.4 ± 0.3 h) as well as a decreased area under the curve ratio of the SIM metabolite simvastatin acid to the parent compound (0.57 ± 0.20 and 0.90 ± 0.3), possibly due to a combination of saturation effects on presystemic metabolising enzymes and prolonged absorption along the small intestine. In summary, this study demonstrated that super-SNEDDS are a viable formulation option to enhance the bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs such as simvastatin while reducing the pill burden by an increased drug load of SNEDDS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chakraborty S, Shukla D, Mishra B, Singh S. Lipid - an emerging platform for oral delivery of drugs with poor bioavailability. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009;73(1):1–70.
Fahr A, Liu X. Drug delivery strategies for poorly water-soluble drugs. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2007;4(4):403–16.
Hauss DH. Oral lipid-based formulations. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2007;59(7):667–76.
Pouton CW, Porter CJH. Formulation of lipid-based delivery systems for oral administration: materials, methods and strategies. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60(6):625–37.
Humberstone AJ, Charman WN. Lipid-based vehicles for the oral delivery of poorly water soluble drugs. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1997;25(1):103–28.
Anton N, Vandamme T. Nano-emulsions and micro-emulsions: clarifications of the critical differences. Pharm Res. 2011;28(5):978–85.
Kovarik JM, Mueller EA, Van Bree JB, Tetzloff W, Kutz K. Reduced inter- and intraindividual variability in cyclosporine pharmacokinetics from a microemulsion formulation. J Pharm Sci. 1994;83(3):444–6.
Mueller EA, Kovarik JM, van Bree JB, Grevel J, Lücker PW, Kutz K. Influence of a fat-rich meal on the pharmacokinetics of a new oral formulation of cyclosporine in a crossover comparison with the market formulation. Pharm Res. 1994;11(1):151–5.
Mueller EA, Kovarik JM, van Bree JB, Tetzloff W, Grevel J, Kutz K. Improved dose linearity of cyclosporine pharmacokinetics from a microemulsion formulation. Pharm Res. 1994;11(2):301–4.
Fatouros DG, Karpf DM, Nielsen FS, Müllertz A. Clinical studies with oral lipid based formulations of poorly soluble compounds. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007;3(4):591–604.
Porter CJH, Trevaskis NL, Charman WN. Lipids and lipid-based formulations: optimizing the oral delivery of lipophilic drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6(March):231–48.
Strickley RG. Solubilizing excipients in oral and injectable formulations. Pharm Res. 2004;21(2):201–30.
Rane SS, Anderson BD. What determines drug solubility in lipid vehicles: is it predictable? Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60(6):638–56.
Thi TD, Van Speybroeck M, Barillaro V, Martens J, Annaert P, Augustijns P, et al. Formulate-ability of ten compounds with different physicochemical profiles in SMEDDS. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2009;38(5):479–88.
Christensen J, Schultz K, Mollgard B, Kristensen HG, Müllertz A. Solubilisation of poorly water-soluble drugs during in vitro lipolysis of medium- and long-chain triacylglycerols. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2004;23(3):287–96.
Kaukonen AM, Boyd BJ, Porter CJH, Charman WN. Drug solubilization behavior during in vitro digestion of simple triglyceride lipid solution formulations. Pharm Res. 2004;21(2):245–53.
Sassene PJ, Knopp MM, Hesselkilde JZ, Koradia V, Larsen A, Rades T, et al. Precipitation of a poorly soluble model drug during in vitro lipolysis: characterization and dissolution of the precipitate. J Pharm Sci. 2010;99(12):4982–91.
Thomas N, Holm R, Müllertz A, Rades T. In vitro and in vivo performance of novel supersaturated self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems (super-SNEDDS). J Control Release. 2012;160(1):25–32.
Tubic-Grozdanis M, Hilfinger J, Amidon G, Kim J, Kijek P, Staubach P, et al. Pharmacokinetics of the CYP 3A substrate simvastatin following administration of delayed versus immediate release oral dosage forms. Pharm Res. 2008;25(7):1591–600.
Pedersen TR, Tobert JA. Simvastatin: a review. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2004;5(12):2583–96.
Hamelin BA, Turgeon J. Hydrophilicity/lipophilicity: relevance for the pharmacology and clinical effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1998;19(1):26–37.
Serajuddin ATM, Ranadive SA, Mahoney EM. Relative lipophilicities, solubilities, and structure-pharmacological considerations of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme a (HMG-COA) reductase inhibitors pravastatin, lovastatin, mevastatin, and simvastatin. J Pharm Sci. 1991;80(9):830–4.
Kang BK, Lee JS, Chon SK, Jeong SY, Yuk SH, Khang G, et al. Development of self-microemulsifying drug delivery systems (SMEDDS) for oral bioavailability enhancement of simvastatin in beagle dogs. Int J Pharm. 2004;274(1–2):65–73.
Zhang Z, Bu H, Gao Z, Huang Y, Gao F, Li Y. The characteristics and mechanism of simvastatin loaded lipid nanoparticles to increase oral bioavailability in rats. Int J Pharm. 2010;394(1–2):147–53.
Thomas N, Müllertz A, Graf A, Rades T. Influence of lipid composition and drug load on the in vitro performance of self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems. J Pharm Sci. 2012;101(5):1721–31.
Zangenberg NH, Müllertz A, Kristensen HG, Hovgaard L. A dynamic in vitro lipolysis model: I. Controlling the rate of lipolysis by continuous addition of calcium. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2001;14(2):115–22.
Zangenberg NH, Müllertz A, Kristensen HG, Hovgaard L. A dynamic in vitro lipolysis model. II: Evaluation of the model. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2001;14(3):237–44.
Shitara Y, Sugiyama Y. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic alterations of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors: drug–drug interactions and interindividual differences in transporter and metabolic enzyme functions. Pharmacol Ther. 2006;112(1):71–105.
Sawada T, Sako K, Yoshihara K, Nakamura K, Yokohama S, Hayashi M. Timed-release formulation to avoid drug–drug interaction between diltiazem and midazolam. J Pharm Sci. 2003;92(4):790–7.
McKinnon RA, McManus ME. Localization of cytochromes P450 in human tissues: implications for chemical toxicity. Pathol (Phila). 1996;28(2):148–55.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the personnel in the animal facilities at H. Lundbeck A/S for their skilful handling of the animals.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thomas, N., Holm, R., Garmer, M. et al. Supersaturated Self-Nanoemulsifying Drug Delivery Systems (Super-SNEDDS) Enhance the Bioavailability of the Poorly Water-Soluble Drug Simvastatin in Dogs. AAPS J 15, 219–227 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-012-9433-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-012-9433-7