Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis on fused deposition modelling performance

  • Published:
Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fused deposition modelling (FDM) is one of rapid prototyping (RP) technologies which uses an additive fabrication approach. Each commercially available FDM model has different types of process parameters for different applications. Some of the desired parts require excellent surface finish as well as good tolerance. The most common parameters requiring setup are the raster angle, tool path, slice thickness, build orientation, and deposition speed. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the process parameters of FDM Prodigy Plus (Stratasys, Inc., Eden Prairie, MN, USA). Various selected parameters were tested and the optimum condition was proposed. The quality of the parts produced was accessed in terms of dimensional accuracy and surface finish. The optimum parameters obtained were then applied in the fabrication of the master pattern prior to silicone rubber moulding (SRM). These parameters would reduce the post processing time. The dimensional accuracy and surface roughness were analyzed using coordinate measuring machine (CMM) and surface roughness tester, respectively. Based on this study, the recommended parameters will improve the quality of the FDM parts produced in terms of dimensional accuracy and surface roughness for the application of SRM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn, D., Kweon, J.H., Kwon, S., Song, J., Lee, S., 2009. Representation of surface roughness in fused deposition modeling. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209(15–16):5593–5600. [doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.05.016]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anitha, R., Arunachalam, S., Radhakrishnan, P., 2001. Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 118(1–3):385–388. [doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00980-3]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellini, A., Güçeri, S., Bertoldi, M., 2004. Liquefier dynamics in fused deposition. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 126(2):237–246. [doi:10.1115/1.1688377]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, C.K, Leong, K.F., Lim, C.S., 2003. Rapid Prototyping: Principles and Applications (2nd Ed.). World Scientific, Singapore, p.127–128.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, T., 2003. Fused Deposition Modeling: A Technology Evaluation. Available from http://www.time-compression.com/articles/html/fused_deposition.html [Accessed on Apr. 4, 2010]

  • Han, W., Jafari, M.A., Danforth, S.C., Safari, A., 2002. Tool path-based deposition planning in fused deposition process. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 124(2):237–246. [doi:10.1115/1.1455026]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanumaiah, N., Ravi, B., 2007. Rapid tooling form accuracy estimation using region elimination adaptive search based sampling technique. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 13(3):182–190. [doi:10.1108/13552540710750933]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B.H., Abdullah, J., Khan, Z.A., 2005. Optimization or rapid prototyping parameters for production of flexible ABS object. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 169(1):54–61. [doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.259]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.S., Kim, S.G., Kim, H.J., Ahn, S.J., 2007. Measurement of anisotrophic compressive strength of rapid prototyping parts. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 187–188(12):627–630. [doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.095]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liou, F.W., 2008. Rapid Prototyping and Engineering Applications, a Toolbox for Prototype Development. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magrab, E.D., 1997. Integrated Product and Process Design and Development, the Product Realization Process. CRC Press, London, p.192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahesh, S., Wong, Y.S., Fuh, J.Y.H., Loh, H.T., 2004. Benchmarking for comparative evaluation of RP systems and processes. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 10(2):123–135. [doi:10.1108/13552540410526999]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooraini, R., 2006. Rapid Prototyping Principles and Applications. Wiley, New Jersey, p.86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahmati, S., Akbari, J., Barati, E., 2007. Dimensional accuracy analysis of wax patterns created by RTV silicon rubber molding using Taguchi approach. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 13(2):115–122. [doi:10.1108/13552540710736803]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Q., Rizvi, G.M., Bellehumeur, C.T., Gu, P., 2008. Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 14(2):72–80. [doi:10.1108/13552540810862028]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Chou, K., 2008. A parametric study of part distortions in fused deposition modelling using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 222(8):959–967. [doi:10.1243/09544054JEM990]

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nur Saaidah Abu Bakar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bakar, N.S.A., Alkahari, M.R. & Boejang, H. Analysis on fused deposition modelling performance. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 11, 972–977 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1001365

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1001365

Key words

CLC number

Navigation