Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Biomechanics and Running Economy

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Running economy, which has traditionally been measured as the oxygen cost of running at a given velocity, has been accepted as the physiological criterion for ‘efficient’ performance and has been identified as a critical element of overall distance running performance. There is an intuitive link between running mechanics and energy cost of running, but research to date has not established a clear mechanical profile of an economic runner. It appears that through training, individuals are able to integrate and accommodate their own unique combination of dimensions and mechanical characteristics so that they arrive at a running motion which is most economical for them.

Information in the literature suggests that biomechanical factors are likely to contribute to better economy in any runner. A variety of anthropometric dimensions could influence biomechanical effectiveness. These include: average or slightly smaller than average height for men and slightly greater than average height for women; high ponderal index and ectomorphic or ectomesomorphic physique; low percentage body fat; leg morphology which distributes mass closer to the hip joint; narrow pelvis and smaller than average feet.

Gait patterns, kinematics and the kinetics of running may also be related to running economy. These factors include: stride length which is freely chosen over considerable training time; low vertical oscillation of body centre of mass; more acute knee angle during swing; less range of motion but greater angular velocity of plantar flexion during toe-off; arm motion of smaller amplitude; low peak ground reaction forces; faster rotation of shoulders in the transverse plane; greater angular excursion of the hips and shoulders about the polar axis in the transverse plane; and effective exploitation of stored elastic energy.

Other factors which may improve running economy are: lightweight but well-cushioned shoes; more comprehensive training history; and the running surface of intermediate compliance.

At the developmental level, this information might be useful in identifying athletes with favourable characteristics for economical distance running. At higher levels of competition, it is likely that ‘natural selection’ tends to eliminate athletes who failed to either inherit or develop characteristics which favour economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Daniels J. Physiological characteristics of champion male athletes. Res Q 1974; 45: 342–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Costill D, Winrow E. A comparison of two middle-aged ultra-marathon runners. Res Q 1970; 41: 135–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pollock M. Submaximal and maximal working capacity of elite distance runners. Part I: cardiorespiratory aspects. Ann NY Acad Sci 1977; 301: 361–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mayhew JL. Oxygen cost and energy expenditure of running intrained runners. Br J Sports Med 1977; 11: 116–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bergh U, Sjödin B, Forsberg A, et al. The relationship between body mass and oxygen uptake during running in humans. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991; 23: 205–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Costill DL, Thomason H, Roberts E. Fractional utilization of the aerobic capacity during distance running. Med Sci Sports 1973; 5: 248–52

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Conley DL, Krahenbuhl G. Running economy and distance running performance of highly trained athletes. Med Sci Sports 1980; 12: 357–60

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Morgan D, Baldini F, Martin P, et al. Ten km performance and predicted velocity at V̇O2max among well-trained male runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1989; 21: 78–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cavanagh PR, Kram R. The efficiency of human movement — a statement of the problem. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1985; 17: 304–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Williams KR. The relationship between mechanical and physiological energy estimates. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1985; 17: 317–25

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Putnam CA, Kozey JW. Substantive issues in running. In: Vaughn CL, editor. Biomechanics of sport. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1989: 1–33

    Google Scholar 

  12. Winter DA. Calculation and interpretation of mechanical energy of movement. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1978; 6: 183–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Norman R, Sharratt M, Pezzak JJ, et al. Reexamination of the mechanical efficiency of horizontal treadmill running In: Komi PV, editor. Biomechanics V-B. Baltimore: University Park, 1976: 87–93

    Google Scholar 

  14. Williams KR, Cavanagh PR. A model for the calculation of mechanical power during distance running. J Biomech 1983; 16: 115–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Morgan DW, Martin PE, Krahenbuhl GS. Factors affecting running economy. Sports Med 1989; 7: 310–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Winter DA. A new definition of mechanical work during human movement. J Appl Physiol 1979; 46: 79–83

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aura O, Komi PV. Mechanical efficiency of pure positive and pure negative work with special reference to the work intensity. Int J Sports Med 1986; 7: 44–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Martin PE, Heise GD, Morgan DW. Interrelationships between mechanical power, energy transfers, and walking and running economy. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993; 25: 508–15

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Taylor CR. Relating mechanics and energetics during exercise. Adv Vet Sci Comp Med 1994; 38A: 181–215

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Oyster N, Wooten EP. The influence of selected anthropometric measurements on the ability of college women to perform the 35-yard dash. Med Sci Sports 1971; 3: 130–4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Daniels J, Krahenbuhl G, Foster K, et al. Aerobic responses of female distance runners to submaximal and maximal exercise. Ann NY Acad Sci 1977; 301: 726–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Burke EJ, Brush FC. Physiological and anthropometric assessment of successful teenage female distance runners. Res Q 1979; 50: 180–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dotan R, Rotstein A, Dlin R, et al. Relationships of marathon running to physiological, anthropometric and training indices. Eur J Appl Physiol 1983: 51: 281–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bale P, Bradbury D, Colley E. Anthropometric and training variables related to 10km running performance. Br J Sports Med 1986: 20: 170–3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Brown CH, Wilmore JH. Physical and physiological profiles of champion women long distance runners [abstract]. Med Sci Sports 1971: 3

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pollock ML, Gettman LR, Jackson A, et al. Body composition of elite class distance runners. Ann NY Acad Sci 1977; 301: 361–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wilmore JH, Brown CH, Davis JA. Body physique and composition of the female distance runner. Ann NY Acad Sci 1977; 301: 764–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wells CL, Hecht LH, Krahenbuhl G. Physical characteristics and oxygen utilization of male and female marathon runners. Res Q 1981; 52: 281–5

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Åstrand PO, Rodahl K. Textbook of work physiology. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dobeln W. Maximal oxygen uptake, body size and total hemoglobin in normal man. Acta Physiol Scand 1956; 38: 193–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rowland TW. Oxygen uptake and endurance fitness in children: a developmental perspective. Pediatr Exerc Sci 1989; 1: 313–28

    Google Scholar 

  32. Unnithan VB, Eston RG. Stride frequency and submaximal treadmill running economy in adults and children. Pediatr Exerc Sci 1990; 2: 149–55

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bourdin M, Pastene J, Germain M, et al. Influence of training, sex, age and body mass on the energy cost of running. Eur J Appl Physiol 1993; 66: 439–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Cavanagh PR, Kram R. Stride length in distance running: velocity, body dimensions and added mass effects. In: Cavanagh PR, editor. Biomechanics of distance running. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1989: 35–63

    Google Scholar 

  35. Elliott BC, Blanksby BA. Optimal stride length considerations for male and female recreational runners. Br J Sports Med 1979; 13: 15–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Tanner JM. The physique of the Olympic athlete. London: Allen & Ulwin, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  37. Malina RM, Harper AB, Avent HH, et al. Physique of female track and field athletes. Med Sci Sports 1971; 3: 32–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kaneko M. Mechanics and energetics in running with special reference to efficiency. J Biomech 1990; 23Suppl. 1: 57–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Williams KR, Cavanagh PR. Relationship between distance running mechanics, running economy, and performance. J Appl Physiol 1987; 63: 1236–46

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Myers MJ, Steudel K. Effect of limb mass and its distribution on the energetic cost of running. J Exp Biol 1985; 116: 363–73

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Catlin ME, Dressendorfer RH. Effect of shoe weight on the energy cost of running [abstract]. Med Sci Sports 1979; 11: 80

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jones BH, Knapik JJ, Daniels WL, et al. The energy cost of women walking and running in shoes and boots. Ergonomics 1986; 29: 439–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Claremont AD, Hall SJ. Effects of extremity loading upon energy expenditure and running mechanics. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1988; 20: 167–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Cappozzo A. The forces and couples in the human trunk during level walking. J Biomech 1983; 16: 265–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cappozzo A. Force actions in the human trunk during running. J Sports Med 1983; 23: 14–22

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Hinrichs RN. Upper extremity function in running. II: angular momentum considerations. Int J Sport Biomech 1987; 3: 242–63

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hinrichs RN, Cavanagh PR, Williams KR. Upper extremity contributions to angular momentum in running. In: Matsui M, Kobayashi K, editors. Biomechanics VIII-B. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1983: 641–7

    Google Scholar 

  48. Anderson T, Tseh W. Running economy, anthropometric dimensions and kinematic variables [abstract]. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994; 26(5 Suppl.): S170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Williams KR, Cavanaugh PR. Biomechanical correlates with running economy in elite distance runners. Proceedings of the North American Congress on Biomechanics; 1986; Montreal, 287–8

  50. James SL, Brubaker CE. Biomechanical and neuromuscular aspects of running. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1973; 1: 189–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Dillman CJ. Kinematic analysis of running. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1975; 3: 193–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Cavanagh PR, Pollock MJ, Landa J. A biomechanical comparison of elite and good distance runners. Ann NY Acad Sci 1977; 301: 328–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Cavanagh PR, Williams KR. The effect of stride length variation on oxygen uptake during distance running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982; 14: 30–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kaneko M, Matsumoto M, Ito A, et al. Optimum step frequency in constant speed running. In: Jonsson B, editor. Biomechanics X-B. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1987: 803–7

    Google Scholar 

  55. Cavagna GA, Williems PA, Franzetti P, et al. The two power limits conditioning step frequency in human running. J Physiol 1991; 437: 95–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Knuttgen HG. Oxygen uptake and pulse rate while running with undetermined and determined stride lengths at different speeds. Acta Physiol Scand 1961; 52: 366–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Williams KR, Cavanagh PR, Ziff JL. Biomechanical studies of elite female distance runners. Int J Sports Med 1987; Suppl. 8: 107–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Hogberg P. How do stride length and stride frequency influence the energy-output during running? Arbeitsphysiologie 1952; Suppl. 14: 437–41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Morgan DW, Martin PE. Effects of stride length alteration on racewalking economy. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1986; 11: 211–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Morgan D, Martin P, Craib M, et al. Effect of step lengthoptimization on the aerobic demand of running. J Appl Physiol 1994; 77: 245–51

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Van der Walt WH, Wyndham CH. An equation for prediction of energy expenditure of walking and running. J Appl Physiol 1973; 34: 559–63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Nilsson J, Thorstensson A. Adaptability in frequency and amplitude of leg movements during human locomotion at different speeds. Acta Physiol Scand 1987; 129: 107–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. McMahon TA, Valiant G, Fredrick EC. Groucho running. J Appl Physiol 1987; 62: 2326–37

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Alexander RM. Energy-saving mechanisms in walking and running. J Exp Biol 1991; 160: 55–69

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Hinrichs RN. Upper extremity function in distance running. In: Cavanagh PR, editor. Biomechanics of distance running Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1990: 107–34

    Google Scholar 

  66. Cavagna GA, Kaneko M. Mechanical work and efficiency in level walking and running. J Physiol 1977; 268: 467–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Amin AS, Prilutskii BI, Raitsin LM, et al. Biomechanical properties of muscles and efficiency of movement. Hum Physiol 1980; 5: 426–34

    Google Scholar 

  68. Aruin AS, Prilutskii BI. Relationship of the biomechanical properties of muscles to their ability to utilize elastic deformation energy. Hum Physiol 1985; 11: 8–12

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Aura O, Komi PV. The mechanical efficiency of locomotion in men and women with special emphasis on stretch-shortening cycle exercises. Eur J Appl Physiol 1986; 55: 37–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Luhtanen P, Komi PV. Mechanical energy states during running. Eur J Appl Physiol 1978; 38: 41–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Léger L, Mercier D. Gross energy cost of horizontal treadmill running. Sports Med 1984; 1: 270–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Cavagna GA, Citterio G. Effects of stretching on the elastic characteristics and the contractile component of frog striated muscle. J Physiol 1974; 239: 1–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Alexander RM, Bennet-Clark HC. Storage of elastic strain energy in muscle and other tissues. Nature 1977; 265: 114–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Ker RF, Bennet MB, Bibby SR, et al. The spring in the arch of the human foot. Nature 1987; 325: 147–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Alexander RM. Elastic mechanisms in animal movement. Cambridge: University Press, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  76. Cavagna GA, Saibene FP, Margaria R. Mechanical work in running. J Appl Physiol 1964; 18: 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  77. Ito A, Komi PV, Sjödin B, et al. Mechanical efficiency ofpositive work in running at different speeds. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1983; 15: 299–308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Cavagna GA. Storage and utilization of elastic energy in skeletal muscle. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1977; 5: 89–129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Saibene F. The mechanisms for minimizing energy expenditure in human locomotion. Eur J Clin Nutr 1990; 1Suppl. 44: 65–71

    Google Scholar 

  80. Asmussen E, Bonde-Petersen F. Apparent efficiency and storage of elastic energy in human muscles during exercise. Acta Physiol Scand 1974; 92: 537–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Thys H, Faraggiana T, Margaria R. Utilization of muscle elasticity with exercise. J Appl Physiol 1972; 32: 491–4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Cavagna GA, Franzetti P, Heglund NC, et al. The determinants of step frequency in running, trotting and hopping in man and other vertebrates. J Physiol 1988; 399: 81–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Bailey SP, Pate RR. Feasibility of improving running economy. Sports Med 1991; 4: 228–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Daniels J, Yarborough R, Foster C. Changes in V̇O2maxand running performance with training. Eur J Appl Physiol 1978; 39: 249–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Mayhew JL, Piper FC, Etheridge GL. Oxygen cost and energy requirements of running in trained and untrained males and females. J Sports Med 1976; 19: 39–44

    Google Scholar 

  86. Dolgener F. Oxygen cost of walking and running in untrained, sprint trained, and endurance trained females. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1982; 22: 60–5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Wilcox AR, Bulbulian R. Changes in running economy relative to V̇O2max during a cross-country season. J Sports Med 1984; 24: 321–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Petray C, Krahenbuhl G. Running training, instruction on running technique, and running economy in 10-year old males. Res Q 1985; 56: 251–5

    Google Scholar 

  89. Bransford D, Howley E. Oxygen cost of running in trained and untrained men and women. Med Sci Sports 1977; 9: 41–4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Mayers N, Gutin B. Physiological characteristics of elite prepubertal cross-country runners. Med Sci Sports 1979; 11: 172–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Pollock M, Jackson A, Pate R. Discriminant analysis of physiological differences between good and elite distance runners. Res Q 1980; 51: 521–32

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Krahenbuhl G, Pangrazi R. Characteristics associated with running performance in young boys. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1983; 15: 486–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Daniels J. A physiologist’s view of running economy. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1985; 17: 332–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Ekblom B, Åstrand PO, Saltin B, et al. Effects of training on circulatory response to exercise. J Appl Physiol 1968; 24: 518–28

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Daniels J, Oldridge N. Changes in oxygen consumption of young boys during growth and running training. Med Sci Sports 1971; 3: 161–5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Patton J, Vogel J. Cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluations of an endurance training program. Med Sci Sports 1977; 9: 100–3

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Daniels J, Oldridge N, Nagle F, et al. Differences and changes in V̇O2max among young runners 10 to 18 years of age. Med Sci Sports 1978; 10: 200–3

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Conley D, Krahenbuhl G, Burkett L. Training for aerobic capacity and running economy. Physician Sports Med 1981; 9: 107–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Sjödin B, Jacobs I, Svendenhag J. Changes in onset of blood lactate accumulation (OBLA) and muscle enzymes after training at OBLA. Eur J Appl Physiol 1982; 49: 45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Conley D, Krahenbuhl G, Burkett L, et al. Following Steve Scott: physiological changes accompanying training. Physician Sports Med 1984; 12: 103–6

    Google Scholar 

  101. Svendenhag J, Sjödin B. Physiological characteristics of elite male runners in and off-season. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1985; 10: 127–33

    Google Scholar 

  102. Brooks GA, Fahey TD, White TP. Exercise physiology: human bioenergetics and its applications. 2nd ed. Mountain View (CA): Mayfield, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  103. Bosco C, Montanari G, Ribacchi R, et al. Relationship between the efficiency of muscular work during jumping and the energetics of running. Eur J Appl Physiol 1987; 56: 138–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Cureton K, Sparling P. Distance running performance and metabolic responses to running in men and women with excess weight experimentally equated. Med Sci Sports 1980; 12: 288–94

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Bhambani Y, Singh M. Metabolic and cinematographic analysis of walking and running in men and women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1985; 17: 131–7

    Google Scholar 

  106. di Prampero PE. The energy cost of human locomotion on land and in water. Int J Sports Med 1986; 7: 55–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Bunc V, Heller J. Energy cost of running in similarly trained men and women. Eur J Appl Physiol 1989; 59: 178–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Sparling PB, Cureton KJ. Biological determinants of the sex difference in 12-min run performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1983; 15: 218–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Helgerud J. Maximal oxygen uptake, anaerobic threshold and running economy in women and men with similar performance levels in marathons. Eur J Appl Physiol 1994; 68: 155–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Daniels J, Daniels N. Running economy of elite male and elite female runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992; 24: 483–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Nelson RC, Brooks CM, Pike NL. Biomechanical comparison of male and female distance runners. Ann NY Acad Sci 1977; 301: 793–807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Åstrand PO. Experimental studies of physical working capacity in relation to sex and age. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard, 1952

    Google Scholar 

  113. MacDougall J, Roche P, Bar-Or O, et al. Maximal aerobic capacity of Canadian school children: prediction based on age-related oxygen cost of running. Int J Sports Med 1983; 4: 194–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Rowland TW, Greene GM. Physiological responses to treadmill exercises in females: adult-child differences. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1988; 20: 474–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Krahenbuhl GS, Morgan DW, Pangrazi RP. Longitudinal changes in distance-running performance of young males. Int J Sports Med 1989; 10: 92–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Shadwick RF. Elastic energy storage in tendons: mechanical differences related to function and age. J Appl Physiol 1990; 68: 1033–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Sidney K, Shephard R. Maximum testing of men and women in the seventh, eighth, and ninth decades of life. J Appl Physiol 1977; 43: 280–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Waters R, Hislop H, Perry J, et al. Comparative cost of walking in young and old adults. J Orthop Res 1983; 1: 73–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Larish D, Martin P, Mungiole M. Characteristic patterns of gait in the healthy old. Ann NY Acad Sci 1987; 515: 18–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Gleim GW, Stachenfield NS, Nicholas JA. The influence of flexibility on the economy of walking and jogging. J Orthop Res 1990; 8: 814–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Burkett LN, Khort WM, Buchbinder R. Effects of shoes and foot orthotics on V̇O2 and selected frontal plane knee kinematics. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1985; 17: 158–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Clement D, Taunton J, Wiley JP, et al. The effects of corrective orthotics on oxygen uptake during running. Proceedings of the World Congress on Sports Medicine; Vienna, 1984

  123. Fredrick EC. Measuring the effects of shoes and surfaces on the economy of locomotion. In: Nigg BM, Kerr BA, editors. Biomechanical aspects of sport shoes and playing surfaces Calgary: University of Calgary, 1983: 93–106

    Google Scholar 

  124. Fredrick EC, Clarke TE, Larsen JL, et al. The effects of shoe cushioning on the oxygen demands of running. In: Nigg BM, Kerr BA, editors. Biomechanical aspects of sport shoes and playing surfaces. Calgary: University of Calgary, 1983: 107–14

    Google Scholar 

  125. Bassett D, Giese M, Nagle F, et al. Aerobic requirements of overground versus treadmill running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1985; 17: 477–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Morgan DW, Craib M. Physiological aspects of running economy. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992; 24: 456–61

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Davies CTM. Effects of wind assistance and resistance on the forward motion of a runner. J Appl Physiol 1980; 48: 702–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Pugh LGCE. The influence of wind resistance in running and walking and the mechanical efficiency of work against horizontal or vertical forces. J Physiol 1971; 213: 255–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. Kyle CR. Reduction of wind resistance and power output of racing cyclists and runners travelling in groups. Ergonomics 1979; 22: 387–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. McMahon TA, Greene PR. Fast running tracks. Sci Am 1978; 239: 148–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. McMahon TA, Greene PR. The influence of track compliance on running. J Biomech 1979; 12: 893–904

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical Education and Human Performance, California State University, 5275 North Campus Drive, Fresno, California, 93740-0028, USA

    Tim Anderson

Authors
  1. Tim Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, T. Biomechanics and Running Economy. Sports Med 22, 76–89 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199622020-00003

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199622020-00003

Keywords

Search

Navigation