Skip to main content
Log in

Health State Preference Assessment in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To assess patient preferences for health states associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).

Design and intervention: Seven health states describing varying stages of disease severity in DPN were developed: mild neuropathy, painful neuropathy, severe neuropathy, minor ulcer, severe ulcer, minor amputation and major amputation. Using a computer interview, both rating scale (RS) and standard gamble (SG) preference scores were elicited from 52 patients with diabetes mellitus.

Setting: A US university medical centre and a Veterans Affairs clinic.

Study participants: Adult patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus between the ages of 18 and 80 years. Patients were excluded if they had been diagnosed with DPN.

Results: Preference scores decreased in accordance with greater symptomatic and functional impairment. Median RS scores ranged from 0.89 to 0.23 for the seven health states. Median SG scores ranged from 0.96 to 0.65.

Conclusions: Patient preferences for health states decrease as a function of increasing disease severity in DPN. The result is robust across the RS and SG methods of preference measurement. These results may be useful in informing policy analyses for resource allocation in patients with diabetes mellitus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Table I
Table II
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harris M, Eastman R, Cowie C. Symptoms of sensory neuropathy in adults with NIDDM in the US population. Diabetes Care 1993 Nov; 16 (11): 1446–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eastman RC. Neuropathy in diabetes. In: Harris MI, editor. Diabetes in America. 2nd ed. Washington (DC): US Govt Printing Office, 1995. Report No.: NIH publ. No. 95-1468: 339–48

    Google Scholar 

  3. Giannini C, Dyck PJ. Pathologic alterations in human diabetic polyneuropathy. In: Dyck PJ, Thomas PK, editors. Diabetic neuropathy. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): WB Saunders Company, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carrington AL, Mawdsley SK, Morley M, et al. Psychological status of diabetic people with or without lower limb disability. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1996 Apr; 32 (1–2): 19–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Benbow SJ, Wallymahmed ME, MacFarlane IA. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy and quality of life. QJM 1998 Nov; 91 (11): 733–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brod M. Quality of life issues in patients with diabetes and lower extremity ulcers: patients and caregivers. Qual Life Res 1998 May; 7 (4): 365–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Patrick D, Erickson P. Health status and health policy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  8. Drummond MF, O’Brien B, Stoddart GL, et al. Methods of the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bardsley MJ, Astell S, McCallum A, et al. The performance of three measures of health status in an outpatient diabetes population. Diabet Med 1993 Aug–Sep; 10 (7): 619–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Childs MR, Peters EJG, Armstrong DG, et al. What is the effect of amputations on the quality of life in diabetic patients? Diabetologia 1998; 41 Suppl. 1: A279

    Google Scholar 

  11. Holtzman J, Caldwell M, Walvatne C, et al. Long-term functional status and quality of life after lower extremity revascularization. J Vasc Surg 1999 Mar; 29 (3): 395–402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Eckman MH, Greenfield S, Mackey WC, et al. Foot infections in diabetic patients. JAMA 1995 Mar 1; 273 (9): 712–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brown GC, Brown MM, Sharm S, et al. Quality of life associated with diabetes mellitus in an adult population. J Diabetes Complications 2000 Jan–Feb; 14 (1): 18–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hux M, Milkovich N, Torrance G, et al. Health-related quality of life related to chronic foot ulcers in diabetics [abstract]. Qual Life Res 1999; 8: 655

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tennvall GR, Apelqvist J. Health-related quality of life in patients with diabetes mellitus and foot ulcers. J Diabetes Complications 2000 Sep–Oct; 14 (5): 235–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, et al. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sumner W, Nease R, Littenberg B. U-titer: a utility assessment tool. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care; 1991: 701–5

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jr Nease RF, Tsai R, Hynes LM, et al. Automated utility assessment of global health. Qual Life Res 1996 Feb; 5 (1): 175–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jr Nease RF, Kneeland T, O’Connor GT, et al. Variation in patient utilities for outcomes of the management of chronic stable angina. JAMA 1995 Apr 19; 273 (15): 1185–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Merlino L, Bagchi I, Taylor T, et al. Reference values for corticosteroid-associated adverse health states in 107 rheumatoid arthritis patients [abstract]. Med Decis Making 1998 Oct–Dec; 18 (4): 470

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tosteson ANA, Gabriel SE, Kneeland TS, et al. Impact of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on quality of life [abstract]. Med Decis Making 1997 Oct–Dec; 17 (4): 532

    Google Scholar 

  22. Froberg DG, Kane RL. Methodology for measuring health state preferences: II. scaling methods. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42 (5): 459–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bass EB, Steinberg EP, Pitt HA, et al. Comparison of the rating scale and standard gamble in measuring patient preferences for outcomes of gallstone disease. Med Decis Making 1994 Oct–Dec; 14 (4): 307–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Technical guidance for manufacturers and sponsors on making a submission to a technology appraisal. Issue date:March 2001. Available from URL: http://server2.nice.org.uk/pdf/technicalguidanceformanufacturersandsponsors.pdf [Accessed 2001 Aug 13]

  25. Nord E. Methods for quality adjustment of life years. Soc Sci Med 1992; 34 (5): 559–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge Darren Augenstein and Louis Garrison, Jr. for their help in the design and analysis of the study. Financial support for this study was provided in part by a contract from Roche Pharmaceuticals. The funding agreement ensured the authors’ independence in designing the study, interpreting the data, writing and publishing the report. At the time of the study, the following authors were completing a post-doctoral fellowship sponsored by Roche and administered by the University of Washington: Doris P. Lew, E. Beth Devine and David L. Veenstra.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sean D. Sullivan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sullivan, S.D., Lew, D.P., Devine, E.B. et al. Health State Preference Assessment in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy. Pharmacoeconomics 20, 1079–1089 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200220150-00004

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200220150-00004

Keywords

Navigation