Skip to main content
Log in

Racial differences in contraceptive choice: Complexity and implications

  • Ethnicity and Race
  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

Previous research has failed to generate consensus about why black fertility has persistently exceeded that of whites in the United States. In an effort to shed light on this question, this article examines black/white differences in sociodemographic factors affecting contraceptive choice. Using data from the 1976 and 1982 National Surveys of Family Growth, we find a complex pattern of black/white differences. Not only does contraceptive choice vary by race, but the effects of such variables as age, marital status, and education also differ between blacks and whites. For example, compared with whites, black married women avoid coital methods, and compared with blacks, white women shift contraceptive behavior more as they change marital status. The complex nature of the racial differences in contraceptive choice are interpreted as reflecting differences in marriage patterns and trends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bachrach, C. A. 1984. Contraceptive practice among Americanwomen, 1973–1982. Family Planning Perspectives 16:253–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, C. A., M. Horn, W. Mosher, and I. Shimizu. 1985. National Survey of Family Growth, CycleIII: Sample Design, Weighting, and Variance Estimation, Vital and Health Statistics, Series 2, No. 98. Hyattsville, Md.: National Center for Health Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, F. D., and J. A. Burr. 1986. Black/White Fertility Differences Revisited: A Reexamination of Alternative Hypotheses. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Population Association of America,San Francisco, April 2–5.

  • Bean, F. D., and J. P. Marcum. 1978. Differential fertility and the minoritygroup statushypothesis: An assessment and review. Pp. 189–211 in F. D. Bean and W. P. Frisbie (eds.), The Demography of Racial and Ethnic Groups. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, F. D., and G. Swicegood. 1985. Mexican American Fertility Patterns. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, N. G., D. E. Bloom,and P. H. Craig. 1985. Black and White Marriage Patterns: Why So Different? Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Population Association of America, Boston, March 27–30.

  • Bongaarts, J. 1978. Aframework for analyzingthe proximate determinantsoffertility. Population and Development Review 4:105–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bumpass, L. L. 1985.The Risk of an Unwanted Birth: The Changing Context of Contraceptive Sterilization in the U.S. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center for Demography and Ecology.

  • Bumpass, L. L., and R. R. Rindfuss. 1984. The effect of marital dissolution on contraceptive protection. Family Planning Perspectives 16:271–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. J. 1981. Marriage, Divorce, Remarriage: Social Trends in the United States. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coale, A. J., and N. Rives. 1973. A statistical reconstruction of the black population of the United States 1880–1970: Estimates of the true numbers by age and sex, birth rates, and total fertility. Population Index 39:3–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coale, A. J., and M. Zelnik. 1963. New Estimates of Fertility and Population in the United States: A Study of Annual White Births From 1850 to 1960 and of Completeness of Enumeration From 1880 to 1960. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, J. C. 1980. Fertility and female employment: Problems of causal direction. American Sociological Review 45:167–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutright, P., and E. Shorter. 1979. The effects of health on the completed fertility of nonwhite and white U.S. womenborn between 1867and 1935. Journal of Social History 13:191–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. D. 1968. Patterns of occupational mobility among Negro men. Demography 5:11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espenshade, T. J. 1985. Marriage trends in America: Estimates, implications, and underlying causes. Population and Development Review 11:193–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. D. R. 1986. American fertility patterns: A comparison of white and nonwhite cohorts born 1903–56. Population and Development Review 12:267–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farley, R. 1970. Growth of the Black Population: A Study of Demographic Trends. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • . 1980. The long road: Blacks and whites in America. American Demographics 2(2):11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • . 1984. Blacks and Whites: Narrowing the Gap. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherman, D. L., and R. M. Hauser. 1978. Opportunity and Change, Studies in Population Series. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldscheider, C., and P. R. Uhlenberg. 1969. Minority group status and fertility. American Journal of Sociology 74:361–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grady, W. R., M. B. Hirsch, N. Keen, and B. Vaughan. 1983. Contraceptive failure and continuation among married women in the United States, 1970–75. Studies in Family Planning 14(1):9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammerslough, C. R. 1984. Characteristics of women who stop using contraceptives. Family Planning Perspectives 16:14–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A., and J. E. Jackson. 1977. Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henshaw, S. K., N. J. Binkin, E. Blaine, and J. C. Smith. 1985. A portrait of American women who obtain abortions. Family Planning Perspectives 17:90–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, C., and G. E. Hendershot. 1979. Trends in Breastfeeding Among American Mothers. Vital and Health Statistics, Series 23, Data From the National Survey of Family Growth. Hyattsville, Md.: National Center for Health Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. E. 1979. Minority-group status and the fertility of black Americans, 1970: A new look. American Journal of Sociology 84:1386–1400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1982. Religious differentials in reproduction: The effects of sectarian education. Demography 19:495–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. A., J. R. Kahn, A. Parnell, R. R. Rindfuss, and C. G. Swicegood. 1985. Non-marital childbearing: Diverging legal and social concerns. Population and Development Review 11:677–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, E. N. 1981. New life styles: Marriage patterns, living arrangements, and fertility outside marriage. Annalsof the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 453:1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcum, J. P. 1986. Explaining Protestant fertility: Belief, commitment, and homogamy. Sociological Quarterly 27:547–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFalls, J. A., and M. H. McFalls. 1984. Disease and Fertility. Orlando, Fla.: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, W. D. 1982. Fertility and family planning in the 1970s: The National Survey of Family Growth. Family Planning Perspectives 14:314–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, W./D., and C. Goldscheider. 1984. Contraceptive patterns of religious and racial groups in the United States, 1955–1976: Convergence and distinctiveness. Studies in Family Planning 15: 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Health Statistics. 1986. Vital Statistics of the United States, 1981 (Vol. I): Natality. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, M., and M. J. Moore. 1980. The legitimacy status of first births to U.S. women aged 15–24, 1939–1978. Family Planning Perspectives 12:16–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, R. 1939. The Natural History of Population. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J. D. 1982. Black America in the 1980s. Population Bulletin 37(4):1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindfuss, R. R., and A. M. Parnell. 1986. How Much Does Marriage Matter Anyhow? Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Population Association of America, San Francisco, April 2–5.

  • Rindfuss, R. R., and E. H. Stephen. 1987. Marital Non-Cohabitation: Separation Does Not Make the Heart Grow Fonder. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Carolina Population Center.

  • Rindfuss, R. R., and J. A. Sweet. 1977. Postwar Fertility Trends and Differentials in the United States, Studies in Population Series. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchey, P. N. 1975. The effect of minority group status on fertility: A re-examination of concepts. Population Studies 29:249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. E., and E. S. Lee. 1974. Minority group status and fertility revisited. American Journal of Sociology 80: 503–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, N. B. 1973. Recent trends and group differences in fertility. Pp. 57–68 in C. F. Westoff (ed.), Toward the End of Growth: Population in America. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1981. Changes in parity orientation from 1970 to 1975. Pp. 101–123 in C. E. Hendershot and P. J. Placek (eds.), Predicting Fertility. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, N. B., and C. F. Westoff. 1972. Wanted and unwanted fertility in the United States: 1965–1970. Pp. 467–488 in C. F. Westoff and R. Parke, Jr. (eds.), Demographic and Social Aspects of Population Growth. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John, C. 1982. Race differences in age at first birth and the pace of subsequent fertility: Implications for the minority group status hypothesis. Demography 19:301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. John, C., and H. G. Grasmick. 1985. Decomposing the black/white fertility differential. Social Science Quarterly 66:132–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schirm, A. L., J. Trussell, J. A. Menken, and W. Grady. 1982. Contraceptive failure in the United States: The impact of social, economic and demographic factors. Family Planning Perspectives 14(2):68–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Lovin, L., and A. R. Tickameyer. 1978. Nonrecursive models of labor force participation, fertility behavior and sex role attitudes. American Sociological Review 43: 541–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stack, C. B. 1974. All Our Kin: Strategies for Survival in a Black Community. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, E. H. 1985, The Effect of Immigration on Fertility: The Case of the Mexican Origin Population in the United States. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, Dept. of Sociology.

  • Swicegood, C. G., S. P. Morgan, and R. R. Rindfuss. 1984. Measurement and replication: Evaluating the consistency of eight U.S. fertility surveys. Demography 21:19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolnay, S. E. 1985. Black American fertility transition, 1880–1940. Sociology and Social Research 70:2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, B., J. Trussell, J. A. Menken, and E. F. Jones. 1977. Contraceptive failure among married women in the United States, 1970–1973. Family Planning Perspectives 9:251–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ventura, S. J. 1983. Births of Hispanic Parentage. Vital and Health Statistics, Ser. 31, No. 6S. Hyattsville, Md.: U.S. Public Health Service, National Center for Health Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waite, L. J., and R. M. Stolzenberg. 1976. Intended childbearing and labor force participation of young women: Insights from nonrecursive models. American Sociological Review 41:235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westoff, C. F., and L. L. Bumpass. 1973. Revolution in birth control practices of U. S. Roman Catholics. Science 179:41–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westoff, C. F., and E. F. Jones. 1977. The secularization of U.S. Catholic birth control practices. Family Planning Perspectives 9:203–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P., and P. Pine. 1984. A False Fertility Transition: The Case of American Blacks. Papers of the East-West Population Institute, No. 90. Honolulu: East-West Population Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelnik, M., J. F. Kantner, and K. Ford. 1981. Sex and Pregnancy in Adolescence, Sage Library of Social Research, Vol. 133. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stephen, E.H., Rindfuss, R.R. & Bean, F.D. Racial differences in contraceptive choice: Complexity and implications. Demography 25, 53–70 (1988). https://doi.org/10.2307/2061477

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2061477

Keywords

Navigation