Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quantity, not quality: the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory capacity

  • Brief Reports
  • Published:
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A key motivation for understanding capacity in working memory (WM) is its relationship with fluid intelligence. Recent evidence has suggested a two-factor model that distinguishes between the number of representations that can be maintained in WM and the resolution of those representations. To determine how these factors relate to fluid intelligence, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis on multiple number-limited and resolution-limited measures of WM ability. The results strongly supported the two-factor model, with fully orthogonal factors accounting for performance in the number-limited and resolution-limited conditions. Furthermore, the reliable relationship between WM capacity and fluid intelligence was exclusively supported by the number factor (r=.66), whereas the resolution factor made no reliable contribution (r=−.05). Thus, the relationship between WM capacity and standard measures of fluid intelligence is mediated by the number of representations that can be simultaneously maintained in WM, rather than by the precision of those representations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awh, E., Barton, B., & Vogel, E. K. (2007). Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items, regardless of complexity. Psychological Science, 18, 622–628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, B., Ester, E. F., & Awh, E. (2009). Discrete resource allocation in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 1359–1367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colom, R., Flores-Mendoza, C., Quiroga, M. Á., & Privado, J. (2005). Working memory and general intelligence: The role of shortterm storage. Personality & Individual Differences, 39, 1005–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 87–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N., Chen, Z., & Rouder, J. N. (2004). Constant capacity in an immediate serial-recall task: A logical sequel to Miller (1956). Psychological Science, 15, 634–640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N., Elliott, E. M., Saults, J. S., Morey, C. C., Mattox, S. M., Hismjatullina, A., & Conway, A. R. A. (2005). On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 42–100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N., Fristoe, N. M., Elliott, E. M., Brunner, R. P., & Saults, J. S. (2006). Scope of attention, control of attention, and intelligence in children and adults. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1754–1768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N., Morey, C. C., AuBuchon, A. M., Zwilling, C. E., & Gilchrist, A. L. (2010). Seven-year-olds allocate attention like adults unless working memory is overloaded. Developmental Science, 13, 120–133.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cusack, R., Lehmann, M., Veldsman, M., & Mitchell, D. J. (2009). Encoding strategy and not visual working memory capacity correlates with intelligence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 641–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J., & Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable model approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda, K., & Vogel, E. K. (2009). Human variation in overriding attentional capture. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 8726–8733.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, J. M., Fuller, R. L., Robinson, B. M., McMahon, R. P., Braun, E. L., & Luck, S. J. (2006). Intact attentional control of working memory encoding in schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 658–673.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halford, G. S., Cowan, N., & Andrews, G. (2007). Separating cognitive capacity from knowledge: A new hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 236–242.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Y. V., Shim, W. M., & Makovski, T. (2008). Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1581–1591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (1997). An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance with application to human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 391–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?! Intelligence, 14, 389–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCollough, A. W., Machizawa, M. G., & Vogel, E. K. (2007). Electrophysiological measures of maintaining representations in visual working memory. Cortex, 43, 77–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNab, F., & Klingberg, T. (2008). Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia control access to working memory. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 103–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mogle, J. A., Lovett, B. J., Stawski, R. S., & Sliwinski, M. J. (2008). What’s so special about working memory? An examination of the relationships among working memory, secondary memory, and fluid intelligence. Psychological Science, 19, 1071–1077.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 369–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scolari, M., Vogel, E. K., & Awh, E. (2008). Perceptual expertise enhances the resolution but not the number of representations in working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 215–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, J. J., & Marois, R. (2004). Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature, 428, 751–754.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, J. J., & Marois, R. (2005). Posterior parietal cortex activity predicts individual differences in visual short-term memory capacity. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 144–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 127–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007a). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114, 104–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth N., & Engle, R. W. (2007b). On the division of short-term and working memory: An examination of simple and complex spans and their relation to higher order abilities. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1038–1066.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, E. K., & Machizawa, M. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428, 748–751.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, E. K., McCollough, A. W., & Machizawa, M. G. (2005). Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature, 438, 500–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y., & Chun, M. M. (2006). Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects. Nature, 440, 91–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, 1227 University of Oregon, 97405, Eugene, OR

    Keisuke Fukuda, Edward Vogel, Ulrich Mayr & Edward Awh

Authors
  1. Keisuke Fukuda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Edward Vogel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ulrich Mayr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Edward Awh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward Awh.

Additional information

Portions of this work were supported by Grant NIH-R01MH087214-01 to E.A. and E.V. We thank Nash Unsworth for valuable discussion of these findings.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fukuda, K., Vogel, E., Mayr, U. et al. Quantity, not quality: the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17, 673–679 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/17.5.673

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/17.5.673

Keywords

Search

Navigation