Abstract
According to Zwaan, Langston, and Graesser’s (1995) event-indexing model, when comprehending text, readers monitor changes in a series of critical dimensions: space, time, protagonist, causality, and intentionality. In this study, the influence of dimensional focus was assessed during situation-model construction. Participants read narratives and were instructed to specifically monitor a single dimension while their sentence reading times were recorded. Critical sentence reading times were then analyzed for all shift types. Results support the general prediction that at least the time and protagonist dimensions are resistant to task demands, demonstrating that comprehenders routinely perform dimensional updating processes that are context independent. These results are discussed in the context of the event-indexing model.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albrecht, J. E., &O’Brien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 1061–1070.
Cook, A. E., Halleran, J. G., &O’Brien, E. J. (1998). What is readily available during reading? A memory-based view of text processing.Discourse Processes,26, 109–129.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990).Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Graesser, A. C., Kassler, M. A., Kreuz, R. J., &McLain-Allen, B. (1998). Verification of statements about story worlds that deviate from normal conceptions of time: What is true about Einstein’s dreams?Cognitive Psychology,35, 246–301.
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., &Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension.Psychological Review,101, 371–395.
Hakala, C. M. (1999). Accessibility of spatial information in a situation model.Discourse Processes,27, 261–279.
Hockett, C. F. (1966). The problem of universal language. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.),Universals of language (2nd ed., pp. 1–29). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lorch, R. F., Jr., &Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 149–157.
Lutz, M. F., &Radvansky, G. A. (1997). The fate of completed goal information.Journal of Memory & Language,36, 293–310.
Magliano, J. P., &Schleich, M. C. (2000). Verb aspect and situation models.Discourse Processes,29, 83–112.
Millis, K. K., Golding, J. M., &Barker, G. (1995). Causal connectives increase inference generation.Discourse Processes,20, 29–49.
Morrow, D. G., Bower, G. H., &Greenspan, S. L. (1989). Updating situation models during narrative comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 292–312.
Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., &Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 165–187.
O’Brien, E. J., Rizzella, M. L., Albrecht, J. E., &Halleran, J. G. (1998). Updating a situation model: A memory-based text processing view.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1200–1210.
Ohtsuka, K., &Brewer, W. F. (1992). Discourse organization in the comprehension of temporal order in narrative text.Discourse Processes,15, 317–336.
Radvansky, G. A., Zwaan, R. A., Curiel, J. M., &Copeland, D. E. (2001). Situation models and aging.Psychology & Aging,16, 145–160.
Rapp, D. N., Gerrig, R. J., &Prentice, D. A. (2001). Readers’ traitbased models of characters in narrative comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,45, 737–750.
Rich, S. S., &Taylor, H. A. (2000). Not all narrative shifts function equally.Memory & Cognition,28, 1257–1266.
Rinck, M., &Bower, G. H. (1995). Anaphora resolution and the focus of attention in situation models.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 110–131.
Rinck, M., &Weber, U. (2003). Who when where: An experimental test of the event-indexing model.Memory & Cognition,31, 1284–1292.
Rinck, M., Williams, P., Bower, G. H., &Becker, E. S. (1996). Spatial situation models and narrative understanding: Some generalizations and extensions.Discourse Processes,21, 23–55.
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., &Zuccolotto, A. (2002).E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
Suh, S., &Trabasso, T. (1993). Inferencing during reading: Converging evidence from discourse analysis, talk-aloud protocols, and recognition priming.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 279–300.
Trabasso, T., &Sperry, L. L. (1985). Causal relatedness and importance of story events.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 595–611.
Trabasso, T., &Suh, S. Y. (1993). Understanding text: Achieving explanatory power coherence through on-line inferences and mental operations in working memory.Discourse Processes,16, 3–34.
Trabasso, T., &van den Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 612–630.
Trabasso, T., van den Broek, P., &Suh, S. Y. (1989). Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in stories.Discourse Processes,12, 1–25.
van Dijk, T. A., &Kintsch, W. (1983).Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Williams, P., & Tarr, M. J. (1999). RSVP: Experimental control software for MacOS (Version 4.0.5) [Software]. Retrieved from http://www.cog .brown.edu/~tarr/rsvp, November 12, 2002.
Zacks, J. M., &Tversky, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception.Psychological Bulletin,127, 3–21.
Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Processing narrative time shifts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1196–1207.
Zwaan, R. A. (1999). Situation models: The mental leap into imagined worlds.Current Directions in Psychological Science,8, 15–18.
Zwaan, R. A. (2001). Language comprehension as guided experience. In L. Degand, Y. Bestgen, W. Spooren, & L. van Waes (Eds.),Multidisciplinary approaches to discourse (pp. 1–9). Amsterdam: Uitgaven Stichting Neerlandistiek.
Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., &Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An eventindexing model.Psychological Science,6, 292–297.
Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., &Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation-model construction in narrative comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 386–397.
Zwaan, R. A., &Oostendorp, H. (1993). Do readers construct spatial representations in naturalistic story comprehension?Discourse Processes,16, 125–143.
Zwaan, R. A., &Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory.Psychological Bulletin,123, 162–185.
Zwaan, R. A., Radvansky, G. A., Hilliard, A. E., &Curiel, J. M. (1998). Constructing multidimensional situation models during reading.Scientific Studies of Reading,2, 199–220.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The research reported here was supported in part by Grant MH-63972 from the National Institute of Mental Health to R.A.Z.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Therriault, D.J., Rinck, M. & Zwaan, R.A. Assessing the influence of dimensional focus during situation model construction. Memory & Cognition 34, 78–89 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193388
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193388