Abstract
We investigated the relative contribution of perfective and imperfective aspectual cues on situation models. In Experiment 1, participants were more likely to choose pictures showing completed events than pictures showing ongoing events when they had read perfective sentences, but chose either picture after reading imperfective sentences. In Experiment 2, only one picture was presented and participants were faster to respond to completed pictures than to ongoing pictures when they had read perfective sentences, but showed no latency differences after reading the imperfective sentences. In Experiment 3, participants were faster to read perfective sentences after having seen completed pictures rather than intermediate pictures, but there was no difference for imperfective sentences. The consistent pattern of results demonstrates that readers construct mental representations of completed events when the perfective aspect is used to describe an event. The lack of effect on imperfective sentences and pictures suggests that each reader represents an in-progress event at varying stages of completion.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barsalou, L.W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,22, 577–660.
Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory.Psychological Review,99, 122–149.
Carreiras, M., Carriedo, N., Alonso, M. A., & Fernández, A. (1997). The role of verb tense and verb aspect in the foregrounding of information during reading.Memory & Cognition,25, 438–446.
Clark, H. H., & Chase, W. G. (1972). On the process of comparing sentences against pictures.Cognitive Psychology,3, 472–517.
Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 257–271.
Comrie, B. (1976).Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dowty, D. R. (1986). The effects of aspectual class on the temporal structure of discourse: Semantics or pragmatics?Linguistics & Philosophy,9, 37–61.
Ferretti, T. R. (2000).Situation schemas, thematic roles and grammatical morphemes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario.
Givón, T. (1992). The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions.Linguistics,30, 5–55.
Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 558–565.
Glenberg, A. M., Robertson, D. A., Jansen, J. L., & Johnson-Glenberg, M. C. (1999). Not propositions.Journal of Cognitive Systems Research,1, 19–33.
Hopper, P. J. (1979). Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In T. Givón (Ed.),Syntax and semantics: Vol. 12. Discourse and syntax (pp. 213–241). New York: Academic Press.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.Psychological Review,95, 163–182.
Klatzky, R. L., Pellegrino, J. W., McCloskey, B. P., & Doherty, S. (1989). Can you squeeze a tomato? The role of motor representations in semantic sensibility judgments.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 56–77.
Magliano, J. P., & Schleich, M. C. (2000). Verb aspect and situation models.Discourse Processes,29, 83–112.
Morrow, D. G. (1985a). Prepositions and verb aspect in narrative understanding.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 390–404.
Morrow, D. G. (1985b). Prominent characters and events organize narrative understanding.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 304–319.
Morrow, D. G. (1990). Spatial models, prepositions, and verb-aspect markers.Discourse Processes,13, 441–469.
Morrow, D. G., & Clark, H. H. (1988). Interpreting words in spatial descriptions.Language & Cognitive Processes,3, 275–291.
Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Verifying different-modality properties for concepts produces switching costs.Psychological Science,14, 119–124.
Pollatsek, A., & Well, A. D. (1995). On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 785–794.
Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Schrijnemakers, J. M. C., & Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with “the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy”: Common misconceptions and alternative solutions.Journal of Memory & Language,41, 416–426.
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002).E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition.Psychological Science,12, 153–156.
ter Meulen, A. G. B. (1995).Representing time in natural language: The dynamic interpretation of tense and aspect. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Truitt, T. P., & Zwaan, R. A. (1997, November).Verb aspect affects the generation of instrument inferences. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Philadelphia.
van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983).Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times.Philosophical Review,66, 143–160.
Vendler, Z. (1967).Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory.Psychological Bulletin,123, 162–185.
Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects.Psychological Science,13, 168–171.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant MH 63972 from the National Institute of Mental Health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Madden, C.J., Zwaan, R.A. How does verb aspect constrain event representations?. Memory & Cognition 31, 663–672 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196106
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196106