Abstract
The influence of temporal modulation on binocular rivalry was examined in two ways. First, an uncontoured field viewed by one eye had its luminance sinusoidally modulated at 4 Hz (full-field flicker). The other eye viewed a similar field that flickered at different temporal frequencies ranging from 5 to 16 Hz. Second, orthogonal sinusoidal dichoptic gratings were phase shifted so as to duplicate the range of temporal-frequency disparities presented with full-field flicker. Three subjects recorded exclusive visibility of the rival fields over 60-sec trials. Full-field flicker produced very few reports of rivalry, and was described as resembling “visual beats” or as an intermediate flicker rate. Usual amounts of rivalry were reported between orthogonal sine-wave gratings; the field flickering at low rates dominated less. These results were essentially confirmed in a second experiment, designed to minimize individual differences in response criteria by requiring subjects to respond to disappearances of small, dichoptic, nonrival markers superimposed on the rival fields. The markers disappeared in concert with episodes of rivalry suppression of the gratings, although disappearances were slightly briefer than supression durations. Disappearances of markers on full-field flicker were rare, extremely brief, and could be attributed to Troxler’s fading rather than rivalry. The absence of rivalry between temporally disparate full-field flicker suggests that rival interactions within transient mechanisms are minimal.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blake, R. (1977). Threshold conditions for binocular rivalry.Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance,3, 251–257.
Blake, R., &Fox, R. (1973). The psychophysical inquiry into binocular summation.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 161–185.
Blake, R., Zimba, L., &Williams, D. (1985). Visual motion, binocular correspondence and binocular rivalry.Biological Cybernetics,52, 391–397.
Blakemore, C. (1970). A new kind of stereoscopic vision.Vision Research,10, 1181–1199.
Breese, B. B. (1899). On inhibition.Psychological Monographs,3, 1–65.
Fox, R., &Check, R. (1966) Forced-choice form recognition during binocular rivalry.Psychonomic Science,6, 471–472.
Fox, R., Todd, S., &Bettinger, L. A. (1975). Optokinetic nystagmus as an objective indicator of binocular rivalry.Vision Research,15, 849–853.
Hollins, M. (1980). The effect of contrast on the completeness of binocular rivalry suppression.Perception & Psychophysics,27, 550–556.
Hollins, M., &Leung, E. H. L. (1978). The influence of color on binocular rivalry. In J. C. Armington, J. Kraushopf, & B. R. Wooten (Eds.),Visual psychophysics and physiology. New York: Academic Press.
Katsumi, O., Peli, E., Oguchi, Y., &Kawara, T. (1985). Effect of contrast on fusional visual evoked potential (VEP): A model and experimental results.American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics,62, 233–239.
Kelly, D. H. (1977). Visual contrast sensitivity.Optica Acta,24, 107–129.
Kulikowski, J. J., &Tolhurst, D. J. (1973). Psychophysical evidence for sustained and transient detectors in human vision.Journal of Physiology,232, 149–162.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1968).On binocular rivalry. The Hague: Mouton.
Oguchi, Y., Katsumi, O., &Kawara, T. (1982). Binocular VECP with and without fusion.Documenta Ophthalmologica,31, 415–420.
O’Shea, R. P., &Crassini, B. (1984). Binocular rivalry occurs without simultaneous presentation of rival stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 266–276.
Sheirrington, C. S. (1911)The integrative action of the nervous system. London: Constable.
Smith, E. L., III.,Levi, D. M., Manny, R. E., Harwerth, R. S., &White, J. (1985). The relationship between binocular rivalry and strabismic suppression.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,26, 80–87.
Wade, N. J. (1975). Monocular and binocular rivalry between contours.Perception,4, 85–95.
Wade, N. J., De Weert, C. M. M., &Swanston, M. T. (1984). Binocular rivalry with moving patterns.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 111–122.
Wallach, H., &Adams, P. A. (1954). Binocular rivalry of achromatic colors.American Journal of Psychology,67, 513–516.
Wolfe, J. M. (1983). Influence of spatial frequency, luminance, and duration on binocular rivalry and abnormal fusion of briefly presented dichoptic stimuli.Perception,12, 447–456.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant NSF 8418731 awarded to Randolph Blake.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O’Shea, R.P., Blake, R. Dichoptic temporal frequency differences do not lead to binocular rivalry. Perception & Psychophysics 39, 59–63 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207584
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207584