Abstract
Individuals tend to adopt either analytic or holistic modes of categorizing objects. In two studies, we examined the relation between these categorization tendencies and cognitive abilities as measured by standard psychometric instruments. The participants in both studies were pretested with a restricted classification task in which it was possible for them to classify simple stimuli by dimensional identity or overall similarity. Those making a large number of either type of categorization were then tested with subtests of the WAIS-R and with the Raven’s progressive matrices. Across both studies, the analytic individuals (many dimensional identity classifications) scored higher than the holistic individuals (many overall similarity classifications) on some but not all of the subtests. The results are consistent with the idea that holistic modes of categorization may be more “primitive” than analytic modes. The findings are discussed in terms of the association between categorization mode and either general or specific cognitive abilities.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anastasi, A. (1982).Psychological testing. New York: Macmillan
Burns, B. (1986). Relationship of perceived stimulus structure and intelligence: Further tests of a separability hypothesis.American Journal of Mental Deficiency,91, 196–200.
Cooper, L. A. (1976). Individual differences in visual comparison processes.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 433–444.
Cooper, L. A., &Podgorny, P. (1976). Mental transformations and visual comparison processes: Effects of complexity and similarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 503–514.
Garner, W. E. (1974).The processing of information and structure. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
Kemler, D. G. (1982). Classification in young and retarded children: The primacy of overall similarity relations.Child Development,53, 768–779.
Kogan, N. (1973). Creativity and cognitive style: A life span perspective. In P. Baltes & K. W. Schaie (Eds.),Life span developmental psychology: Personality and socialization (pp. 145–178). New York: Academic Press
Lezak, M. D. (1983).Neuropsychological assessment (2nd ed). New York: Oxford University Press.
Raven, J. C., Court, J. H. &Raven, J. (1983).Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. London: Lewis.
Shepp, B. E., Burns, B., &McDonough, D. (1980). The relation of stimulus structure to perceptual and cognitive development: Further tests of a separability hypothesis. In F. Wilkening, J. Becker, & T. Trabasso (Eds.),Information integration by children (pp. 113–145). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
Smith, J. D., &Baron, J. (1981). Individual differences in the classification of stimuli by dimensions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 1132–1145.
Smith, J. D., &Kemler Nelson, D. G. (1984). Overall similarity in adults’ classification: The child in all of us.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 137–159.
Smith, L. B., & Evans, P. (in press). Similarity, identity and dimensions: Perceptual classification in children and adults. In B. E. Shepp & S. Ballesteros (Eds.), Object perception Structure and process. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Smith, L. B., &Kemler, D. O. (1977). Developmental trends in free classification: Evidence for a new conceptualization of perceptual development.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,24, 279–298.
Thurstone, L. L. (1944).A factorial study of perception. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Ward, T. B. (1980). Separable and integral responding by children and adults to the dimensions of length and density.Child Development,51, 676–684.
Ward, T. B. (1983). Response tempo and separable-integral responding: Evidence for an integral-to-separable processing sequence in visual perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 103–112.
Ward, T. B. (1985). Individual differences in processing stimulus dimensions: Relation to selective processing abilities.Perception & Psychophysics,37, 471–482.
Ward, T. B., Foley, C. M., &Cole, J. (1986). Classifying multidimensional stimuli: Stimulus, task and observer factors.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,12, 211–225.
Wechsler, D. (1981).Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The results of Study 1 were presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York, August 1987. This work was supported by Grant MH 39369 from the National Institute of Mental Health to Thomas B. Ward.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ward, T.B., Stagner, B.H., Scott, J.G. et al. Classification behavior and measures of intelligence: Dimensional identity versus overall similarity. Perception & Psychophysics 45, 71–76 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208035
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208035