Abstract
Time-course studies of semantic verification are reviewed, discussed, and reinterpreted with the aim of drawing general theoretical conclusions about semantic memory structure. These reaction time, speed-accuracy tradeoff, speed-accuracy decomposition, and event-related (brain) potential (ERP) studies suggest that semantic memory is structured on at least three levels. In particular, specific models of the intermediate (macrostructural) level are discussed and compared. ERP investigations of this level suggest that context-independent and context-dependent types of semantic information are potentially isolable and analyzable.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R. (1978). Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery.Psychological Review,85, 249–277.
Anderson, J. R. (1983).The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Barsalou, L. W. (1987). The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In U. Neisser (Ed.),Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 101–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Battig, W. F., &Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,80 (3, Pt. 2).
Bentin, S., &Peled, B.-S. (1990). The contribution of task-related factors to ERP repetition effects at short and long lags.Memory & Cognition,18, 359–366.
Broadbent, D. E. (1958).Perception and communication. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
Brown, C., &Hagoort, P. (1993). The processing nature of the N400: Evidence from masked priming.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,5, 34–44.
Casey, P. J. (1992). A reexamination of the roles of typicality and category dominance in verifying category membership.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 823–834.
Casey, P. J., &Heath, R. A. (1989). A semantic memory sentence verification model based on relative judgment theory.Memory & Cognition,17, 463–473.
Casey, P. J., &Heath, R. A. (1990). Semantic memory retrieval: Deadlining the typicality effect.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,42A, 649–673.
Chaffin, R., &Herrmann, D. J. (1988). The nature of semantic relations: A comparison of two approaches. In M. Evens (Ed.),Relational models of the lexicon (pp. 289–334). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Chang, T. M. (1986). Semantic memory: Facts and models.Psychological Bulletin,99, 199–220.
Chumbley, J. I. (1986). The roles of typicality, instance dominance, and category dominance in verifying category membership.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 257–267.
Collins, A. M., &Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review,82, 407–428.
Collins, A. M., &Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,8, 240–247.
Corbett, A. T., &Wickelgren, W. A. (1978). Semantic memory retrieval: Analysis by speed-accuracy tradeoff functions.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,30, 1–15.
Damasio, A. R., &Damasio, H. (1992). Brain and language.Scientific American,267, 88–95.
Duffy, F. H., Iyer, V. G., &Surwillo, W. W. (1989).Clinical electro encephalography topographic brain mapping: Technology and practice. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Feldman, J. A. (1989). Neural representation of conceptual knowledge. In L. Nadel, L. A. Cooper, P. Culicover, & R. M. Harnish (Eds.),Neural connections, mental computation (pp. 69–103). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fischler, I., Bloom, P. A., Childers, D. G., Roucos, S. E., &Perry, N.W. (1983). Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification.Psychophysiology,20, 400–409.
Fischler, I., &Raney, G. E. (1991). Language by eye: Behavioral, autonomic and cortical approaches to reading. In J. R. Jennings & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.),Handbook of cognitive psychology: Central and autonomic nervous system (pp. 511–574). New York: Wiley.
Glass, A. L., &Holyoak, K. J. (1975). Alternative conceptions of semantic memory.Cognition,3, 313–339.
Glass, A. L., Millen, D. R., Beck, L. G., &Eddy, J. L. (1985). Representation of images in sentence verification.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 442–465.
Gruenenfelder, T. M. (1986). Relational similarity and context effects in category verification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 587–599.
Hampton, J. A. (1984). The verification of property and category statements.Memory & Cognition,12, 345–354.
Hillyard, S. A., &Picton, T. W. (1987). Electrophysiology of cognition. In F. Plum (Ed.),Handbook of physiology: Section 1. Neurophysiology (pp. 519–584). New York: American Physiological Society.
Hinton, G. E., McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1986). Distributed representations. In J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.),Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructures of cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 77–109). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Holcomb, P. J. (1988). Automatic and attentional processing: An eventrelated brain potential analysis of semantic priming.Brain & Language,35, 66–85.
Holcomb, P. J. (1989). The effects of stimulus energy on language sensitive ERPs.Psychophysiology,26, S33.
Holcomb, P. J. (1993). Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: Implications for the role of the N400 in language processing.Psychophysiology,30, 47–61.
Holcomb, P. J., &Kounios, J. (1990). Semantic memory: An ERP and reaction time analysis. In C. H. M. Brunia, A.W. K. Gaillard, & A. Kok (Eds.),Psychophysiological brain research (pp. 285–288). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
Holcomb, P. J.,Kounios, J., &Anderson, J. E. (1996).Concreteness, context, and semantic processing: An ERP investigation. Manuscript in preparation.
Hollan, J. D. (1975). Features and semantic memory: Set-theoretic or network model?Psychological Review,82, 154–155.
Johnson, R. (1993). On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related potential.Psychophysiology,30, 90–97.
Kieras, D. (1978). Beyond pictures and word: Alternative information processing models for imagery effects in verbal memory.Psychological Bulletin,85, 532–554.
Kintsch, W. (1980). Semantic memory: A tutorial. In R. Nickerson (Ed.),Attention and performance VIII (pp. 595–620). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Komatsu, L. K. (1992). Recent views of conceptual structure.Psychological Bulletin,112, 500–526.
Kounios, J. (1993). Process complexity in semantic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 338–351.
Kounios, J., &Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Structure and process in semantic memory: Evidence from event-related brain potentials and reaction times.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 459–479.
Kounios, J., &Holcomb, P. J. (1994). Concreteness effects in semantic processing: ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 804–823.
Kounios, J., Montgomery, E. C., &Smith, R. W. (1994). Semantic memory and the granularity of semantic relations: Evidence from speed-accuracy decomposition.Memory & Cognition,22, 729–741.
Kounios, J., Osman, A. M., &Meyer, D. E. (1987). Structure and process in semantic memory: New evidence based on speed-accuracy decomposition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,116, 3–25.
Kounios, J., &Smith, R. W. (1995). Speed-accuracy decomposition yields a sudden insight into all-or-none information processing.Acta Psychologica,90, 229–241.
Kutas, M., &Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.Science,207, 203–205.
Kutas, M., &Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association.Nature,307, 161–163.
Kutas, M., Lindamood, T., &Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Word expectancy and event-related brain potentials during sentence processing. In S. Kornblum & J. Requin (Eds.),Preparatory states and processes (pp. 217–238). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Larochelle, S., &Pineau, H. (1994). Determinants of response times in the semantic verification task.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 796–823.
Lorch, R. (1982). Priming and search processes in semantic memory: A test of three models of spreading activation.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,21, 468–492.
McCarthy, G., &Nobre, A. C. (1993). Modulation of semantic processing by spatial selective attention.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,88, 210–219.
McCarthy, G., &Wood, C. C. (1985). Scalp distributions of eventrelated potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,62, 203–208.
McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade.Psychological Review,86, 287–330.
McCloskey, M. (1980). The stimulus familiarity problem in semantic memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 485–502.
McCloskey, M., &Glucksberg, S. (1979). Decision processes in verifying category membership statements: Implications for models of semantic memory.Cognitive Psychology,3, 313–339.
Mervis, C. B., Catlin, J., &Rosch, E. (1976). Relationships among goodness-of-example, category norms, and word frequency.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,7, 283–284.
Meyer, D. E. (1970). On the representation and retrieval of stored semantic information.Cognitive Psychology,1, 242–299.
Meyer, D. E., Irwin, D. E., Osman, A. M., &Kounios, J. (1988). The dynamics of cognition and action: Mental processes inferred from speed-accuracy decomposition.Psychological Review,95, 183–237.
Miller, J. (1988). Discrete and continuous models of human information processing: Theoretical distinctions and empirical results.Acta Psychologica,67, 191–257.
Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Newell, A. (1973). You can’t play 20 questions with nature and win: Projective comments on the papers in this symposium. In W. G. Chase (Ed.),Visual information processing (pp. 283–308). New York: Academic Press.
Nunez, P. L. (1990). Physical principles and neurophysiological mechanisms underlying event-related potentials. In J.W. Rohrbaugh, R. Parasuraman, & R. Johnson, Jr. (Eds.),Event-related brain potentials: Basic issues and applications (pp. 19–36). New York: Oxford University Press.
Osterhout, L., &Holcomb, P. J. (1995). Event-related potentials and language comprehension. In M. Rugg & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.),Electrophysiology of mind (pp. 171–215). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pachella, R. G. (1974). The interpretation of reaction time in information processing research. In B. Kantowitz (Ed.),Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 41–82). New York: Halstead Press.
Paivio, A. (1990).Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status.Canadian Journal of Psychology,45, 255–287.
Posner, M. I., &Raichle, M. E. (1994).Images of mind. New York: Scientific American Library.
Ratcliff, R. (1988). Continuous versus discrete information processing: Modeling accumulation of partial information.Psychological Review,95, 238–255.
Ratcliff, R., &McKoon, G. (1982). Speed and accuracy in the processing of false statements about semantic information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 16–36.
Regan, D. (1989).Human electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine. New York: Elsevier.
Rips, L. J., Smith, E. E., &Shoben, E. J. (1975). Set-theoretic and network models reconsidered: A comment on Hollan’s “Features and semantic memory.”Psychological Review,82, 156–157.
Rosch, E. H. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology,104, 192–233.
Rugg, M. D. (1990). Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high- and low-frequency words.Memory & Cognition,18, 367–379.
Rugg, M. D., Furda, J., &Lorist, M. (1988). The effects of task on the modulation of event-related potentials by word repetition.Psychophysiology,25, 55–63.
Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., &the PDP Research Group (1986).Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Saffran, E. M., &Schwartz, M. F. (1994). Of cabbages and things: Semantic memory from a neuropsychological perspective—A tutorial review. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 508–536). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1991). Why are abstract concepts hard to understand? In P. J. Schwanenflugel (Ed.),The psychology of word meanings (pp. 223–250). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schwanenflugel, P. J., &Shoben, E. J. (1983). Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 82–102.
Schwanenflugel, P. J., &Stowe, R. W. (1989). Context availability and the processing of abstract and concrete words in sentences.Reading Research Quarterly,24, 114–126.
Schwartz, T., Holcomb, P., &Kounios, J. (1990). Semantic satiation and event-related potentials [Abstract].The Clinical Neuropsychologist,4, 303.
Schweickert, R. (1993). Information, time, and the structure of mental events: A 25 year review. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.),Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience—A silver jubilee (pp. 535–566). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schweickert, R., &Boggs, G. J. (1984). Models of central capacity and concurrency.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,28, 223–281.
Shepard, R. N., &Cooper, L. A. (1982).Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Smith, E. E. (1978). Theories of semantic memory. In W. K. Estes (Ed.),Handbook of learning and cognitive processes: Vol. 6. Linguistic functions in cognitive theories (pp. 1–56). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., &Rips, L. J. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions.Psychological Review,81, 214–241.
Smith, R. W., &Kounios, J. (in press). Sudden insight: All-or-none processing revealed by speed-accuracy decomposition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition.
Smith, R. W.,Kounios, J., &Osterhout, L. (1996).The applicability and robustness of speed-accuracy decomposition, a technique for measuring partial information. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.),Attention and performance II (pp. 276–315). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Thomsen, C. J.,Lavine, H., &Kounios, J. (in press). Social value and attitude concepts in semantic memory: Relational structure, concept strength, and the fan effect.Social Cognition.
Wickelgren, W. (1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics.Acta Psychologica,41, 67–85.
Wong, P. K. H. (1991).Introduction to brain topography. New York: Plenum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The preparation of this article was supported by National Institute of Mental Health Grant CEP 1 R29 MH45447-01A3 to J.K. Thanks go to Jane Anderson, Phillip J. Holcomb, James Neely, Allen Osman, Richard Schweickert, Roderick Smith, and various anonymous reviewers for helpful discussions, advice, and comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kounios, J. On the continuity of thought and the representation of knowledge: Electrophysiological and behavioral time-course measures reveal levels of structure in semantic memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 3, 265–286 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210752
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210752