Abstract
Three experiments failed to provide evidence that subjects could search just the digits, or just the letters, of a mixed list of digits and letters in deciding whether a probe item was a member of the list. Providing a precue as to the category of the probe shortly before the presentation of the probe decreased the time needed to encode it, but did not change the memory search process. Repeating the category of the probe from one trial to the next, however, did change the pattern of memory search. A “partially selective search” model was proposed which claimed that a mixed list was stored as two categorized sublists, and that a self-terminating search of the sublists could occur in which the first sublist searched was the one which had been probed on the previous trial.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference Notes
Clifton, C., Jr., Cruse, D., & Gutschera, K. D.On the interaction of target set and response requirement in a character classification task. Report 73-2, Cognitive Processes Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, March 1973.
Clifton, C., Jr., Cruse, D., Gutschera, K. D., & Torosian, S.The lack of interaction between target set and response requirement in a character classification task. Report 75-2, Cognitive Processes Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, June 1975.
Digman, L., & Pollatsek, A.Limits on the use of categorical information in visual search. Unpublished manuscript, 1975.
Posner, M. Personal communication, September 23, 1975.
Schneider, W.Selective attention, memory scanning, and visual search: Three components of one process. Report 75-6, Indiana Mathematical Psychology Program, Indiana University, 1975.
References
Atkinson, R. C., Herrmann, D. J., &Wescourt, K. T. earch processes in recognition memory. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Theories in cognitive psychology. Washington, D.C: Winston, 1974.
Barron,R. W. Locus of the effect of a distinguishing feature in a memory search task.Memory & Cognition, 1975,3, 302–310.
Biederman, I., &Stacy, E. W. Stimulus probability and stimulus set in memory scanning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,102, 1100–1107.
Brand, J. Classification without identification in visual search.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,23, 178–186.
Clifton, C., Jr.,Cruse, D., &Gutschera, K. D. Recoding processes in recognition: Some effects of presentation rate.Memory & Cognition, 1973,1, 387–394.
Clifton, C., Jr., &Gutschera, K. D. Hierarchical search of two-digit numbers in a recognition memory task.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1971,10, 528–542.
Crain, R. D., &Derosa, D. V. Retrieval of information from multiple ensembles in short-term memory.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 255–260.
Cruse, D., &Clifton, C., Jr. Recoding strategies and the retrieval of information from memory.Cognitive Psychology, 1973,4, 157–193.
Darley, C. F. Effects of memory load and its organization on the processing of information in short term memory. (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1973).Dissertation Abstracts International, 1974,34, G234B. (University Microfilms No. 74-13, 618).
Darley, C. F., Klatzky, R. L., &Atkinson, R. C. Effects of memory load on reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,96, 232–234.
Egeth, H., Jonides, J., &Wall, S. Parallel processing of multi-element displays.Cognitive Psychology, 1972,3, 674–698.
Egeth, H., Marcus, N., &Bevan, W. Target-set and response-set interaction: Implications for models of human information processing.Science, 1972,176, 1447–1448.
Herrtmann, D. J., McLaughlin, J. P., &Nelson, B. C. Visual and semantic factors in recognition from long-term memory.Memory & Cognition, 1975,3, 381–384.
Homa, D. Organization and long-term memory search.Memory & Cognition, 1973,1, 369–379.
Ingling, N. W. Categorization: A mechanism for rapid information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,94, 239–243.
Jonides, J., &Gleitman, H. A conceptual category effect in visual search: O as letter or digit.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,12, 457–460.
Kaminsky, C. A., &Derosa, D. V. Infiuence of retrieval cues and set organization on short-term recognitibn memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,96, 449–454.
Kornblum, S. Sequential effects in choice reaction time: A tutorial review. In S. Kornblum (Ed.),Attention and performance IV. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Krueger, L. T. The effect of an extraneous added memory set on item recognition: A test of parallel-dependent vs. serial-comparison models.Memory & Cognition, 1975,3, 485–495.
Lively, B. L., &Sanford, B. J. The use of category information in a memory-search task.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,93, 379–385.
Marcel, T., &Forrin, B. Naming latency and the repetition of stimulus categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,103, 450–460.
Meyer, D. E., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,90, 227–234.
Mohs, R. C., Wescourt, K. T., &Atkinson, R. C. Effects of short-term memory contents on short- and long-term memory searches.Memory & Cognition, 1973,1, 443–448.
Myers, J. L.Fundamentals of experimental design. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1972.
Naus, M. J. Memory search of categorized lists: A consideration of alternative self-terminating search strategies.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,102, 992–1000.
Naus, M. J., Glucksberg, S., &Ornstein, P. A. Taxonomic word categories and memory search.Cognitive Psychology, 1972,3, 643–654.
Okada, R., &Burrows, D. Organizational factors in highspeed scanning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,101, 77–81.
Posner, M. I. On the relationship between letter names and superordinate categories.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,22, 279–287.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Schneider, W. An expectancy model for memory search.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 616–628.
Sternberg, S. High-speed scanning in human memory.Science, 1996,153, 652–654.
Sternberg, S. Memory-scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments.American Scientist, 1969,57, 421–457. (a)
Sternberg, S. The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donder’s method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.),Attention and performance II. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1969. (b)
Sternberg, S. Memory scanning: New findings and current controversies.Quarter Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1975,27, 1–32.
Taylor, G. A., &Juola, J. F. Priming effects on recognition performance.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1974,3, 277–279.
Theios, J., &Walter, D. G. Stimulus and response frequency and sequential effects in memory scanning reaction times.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,102, 1092–1099.
Townsend, J. R. A note on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes.Perception & Psychophysics, 1971,10, 161–163.
Wattenbarger, B. L., &Pachella, R. G. The effect of memory load on reactton time in character classification.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,12, 100–102.
Williams, J. D. Memory ensemble selection in human information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,88, 231–238.
Wingfield, A., &Branca, A. A. Strategy in high-speed memory search.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,83, 63–67.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by National Institute of Mental Health Research Grant MH-23939.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clifton, C., Brewer, E. Partially selective search of memory for letters and digits. Memory & Cognition 4, 616–626 (1976). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213226
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213226