Abstract
The main objective of this study is to investigate the abstract-concrete dichotomy by introducing a new variable: the mode of acquisition (MoA) of a concept. MoA refers to the way in which concepts are acquired: through experience, through language, or through both. We asked 250 participants to rate 417 words on seven dimensions: age of acquisition, concreteness, familiarity, context availability, imageability, abstractness, and MoA. The data were analyzed by considering MoA ratings and their relationship with the other psycholinguistic variables. Distributions for concreteness, abstractness, and MoA ratings indicate that they are qualitatively different. A partial correlation analysis revealed that MoA is an independent predictor of concreteness or abstractness, and a hierarchical multiple regression analysis confirmed MoA as being a valid predictor of abstractness. Strong correlations with measures for the English translation equivalents in the MRC database confirmed the reliability of our norms. The full database of MoA ratings and other psycholinguistic variables may be downloaded from http:// brm.psychonomic-journals.org/content/supplemental or www.abstract-project.eu.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altarriba, J., Bauer, L. M., & Benvenuto, C. (1999). Concreteness, context availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 578–602.
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., et al. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459.
Barca, L., Burani, C., & Arduino, L. S. (2002). Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 424–434.
Campos, A. (1990). Concreteness, imagery, emotionality, and interest values of words when meaning is controlled. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 71, 603–610.
Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 497–505.
Friendly, M., Franklin, P. E., Hoffman, D., & Rubin, D. C. (1982). The Toronto Word Pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 14, 375–399.
Gilhooly, K. J., & Logie, R. H. (1980). Age of acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 12, 395–427.
Gleitman, L. R., Cassidy, K., Nappa, R., Papafragou, A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2005). Hard words. Language Learning & Development, 1, 23–64.
Kousta, S., Della Rosa, P. A., Cappa, S. F., & Vigliocco, G. (2007, August). The effect of mode of acquisition on lexical representation and processing. Paper presented at the 13th Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing, Turku, Finland.
Nelson, D. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1992). Word concreteness and word structure as independent determinants of recall. Journal of Memory & Language, 31, 237–260.
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 1–25.
Schwanenflugel, P. J., Akin, C., & Luh, W. (1992). Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words. Memory & Cognition, 20, 96–104.
Schwanenflugel, P. J., Harnishfeger, K. K., & Stowe, R. W. (1988). Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. Journal of Memory & Language, 27, 499–520.
Setti, A., & Caramelli, N. (2005). Different domains in abstract concepts. In B. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the XXVII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1997–2002). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Toglia, M. P., & Battig, W. R. (1978). Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wauters, L. N., Tellings, A., & van Bon, W. H. J. (2008). Mode of acquisition as a factor in deaf children’s reading comprehension. Journal of Deaf Studies & Deaf Education, 13, 175–192.
Wauters, L. N., Tellings, A., van Bon, W. H. J., & van Haaften, W. A. (2003). Word of acquisition of word meanings: The viability of a theoretical construct. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 385–406.
Wiemer-Hastings, K., Krug, J., & Xu, X. (2001). Imagery, context availability, contextual constraints and abstractness. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1106–1111). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by a European Union (FP6-2004-NEST-PATH) Grant (028714) to S.F.C.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Della Rosa, P.A., Catricalà, E., Vigliocco, G. et al. Beyond the abstract—concrete dichotomy: Mode of acquisition, concreteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, context availability, and abstractness norms for a set of 417 Italian words. Behavior Research Methods 42, 1042–1048 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.4.1042
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.4.1042