Abstract
In choice reaction time tasks, response times and error rates demonstrate differential dependencies on the identities of up to four stimuli preceding the current one. Although the general profile of reaction times and error rates, when plotted against the stimulus histories, may seem idiosyncratic, we show that it can result from simple underlying mechanisms that take account of the occurrence of stimulus repetitions and alternations. Employing a simple connectionist model of a two-alternative forcedchoice task, we explored various combinations of repetition and alternation detection schemes in an attempt to account for empirical results from the literature and from our own studies. We found that certain combinations of the repetition and the alternation schemes provided good fits to the data, suggesting that simple mechanisms may serve to explain the complicated but highly reproducible higher order dependencies of task performance on stimulus history.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Audley, R. J. (1973). Some observations on theories of choice reaction time: Tutorial review. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance IV (pp. 509–549). New York: Academic Press.
Berns, G., Cohen, J., & Mintun, M. (1997). Brain regions responsive to novelty in the absence of awareness. Science, 276, 1272–1275.
Bertelson, P. (1961). Sequential redundancy and speed in a serial twochoice responding task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 90–102.
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.
Brown, E., & Holmes, P. (2001). Modeling a simple choice task: Stochastic dynamics of inhibitory neural groups. Stochastics & Dynamics, 1, 159–191.
Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M., Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D. (1998). Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science, 280, 747–749.
Cleeremans, A. (1993). Mechanisms of implicit learning: Connectionist models of sequence processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332–361.
Cohen, J. [D.], MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257–271.
Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 11, 357–427.
Dorris, M. C., & Munoz, D. P. (1998). Saccadic probability influences motor preparation signals and time to saccadic initiation. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 7015–7026.
Dorris, M. C., Pare, M., & Munoz, D. P. (2000). Immediate neural plasticity shapes motor performance. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 1–5.
Dorris, M. C., Taylor, T. L., & Klein, R. M. (1999). Influence of previous visual stimulus or saccade on saccadic reaction times in monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 81, 2429–2436.
Falmagne, J. C., Cohen, S. P., & Dwivedi, A. (1975). Two-choice reactions as an ordered memory scanning process. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and performance V (pp. 296–344). New York: Academic Press.
Hinton, G. E., & Plaut, D. C. (1987). Using fast weights to deblur old memories. In Program of the Ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 177–186). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Huettel, S. A., Mack, P. B., & McCarthy, G. (2002). Perceiving patterns in random series: Dynamic processing of sequence in prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 485–490.
Hyman, R. (1953). Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 188–196.
Jones, A. D., Cho, R. Y., Nystrom, L. E., Cohen, J. D., & Braver, T. S. (2002). A computational model of anterior cingulate function in speeded response tasks: Effects of frequency, sequence, and conflict. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 300–317.
Kirby, N. H. (1976). Sequential effects in two-choice reaction time: Automatic facilitation or subjective expectancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 567–577.
Kirby, N. H. (1980). Sequential effects in choice reaction time. In A. T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction times (pp. 129–172). London: Academic Press.
Kornblum, S. (1967). Choice reaction times for repetitions and nonrepetitions: A re-examination of the information hypothesis. Acta Psychologica, 27, 178–187.
Laming, D. (1968). Information theory of choice reaction times. London: Academic Press.
Laming, D. (1979). Choice reaction performance following an error. Acta Psychologica, 43, 199–224.
Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times. New York: Oxford University Press.
McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287–330.
Mozer, M. C., Colagrosso, M. D., & Huber, D. H. (2002). A rational analysis of cognitive control in a speeded discrimination task. In T. Dietterich, S. Becker, & Z. Ghahramani (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems XIV. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rabbitt, P., & Rodgers, B. (1977). What does a man do after he makes an error? An analysis of response programming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 727–743.
Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59–10.
Ratcliff, R., Van Zandt, T., & McKoon, G. (1999). Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. Psychological Review, 106, 261–300.
Remington, R. J. (1968). Analysis of sequential effects in choice reaction times. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 250–257.
Soetens, E., Boer, L. C., & Hueting, J. E. (1985). Expectancy or automatic facilitation? Separating sequential effects in two-choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 598–616.
Sommer, W., Leuthold, H., & Soetens, E. (1999). Covert signs of expectancy in serial reaction time tasks revealed by event-related potentials. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 342–353.
Squires, K. C., Wickens, C., Squires, N. K., & Donchin, E. (1976). The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical eventrelated potential. Science, 193, 1142–1146.
Sternberg, S. (1969). Memory-scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction time experiments. American Scientist, 57, 421–457.
Strogatz, S. (1994). Nonlinear dynamics and chaos. Reading, MA: Perseus.
Usher, M., & McClelland, J. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108, 550–592.
Vervaeck, K. R., & Boer, L. C. (1980). Sequential effects in two-choice reaction time: Subjective expectancy and automatic aftereffect at short response-stimulus intervals. Acta Psychologica, 44, 175–190.
Yeung, N., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2002). The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was supported by National Institute of Mental Health Conte Center Grant P50MH62196.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cho, R.Y., Nystrom, L.E., Brown, E.T. et al. Mechanisms underlying dependencies of performance on stimulus history in a two-alternative forced-choice task. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2, 283–299 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.2.4.283
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.2.4.283