Abstract
P50 suppression deficits have been documented in clinical and nonclinical populations, but the behavioral correlates of impaired auditory sensory gating remain poorly understood. In the present study, we examined the relationship between P50 gating and healthy adults’ performance on cognitive inhibition tasks. On the basis of load theory (Lavie, Hirst, de Fockert, & Viding, 2004), we predicted that a high perceptual load, a possible consequence of poor auditory P50 sensory gating, would have differential (i.e., positive vs. negative) effects on performance of cognitive inhibition tasks. A dissociation was observed such that P50 gating was negatively related to interference resolution on a Stroop task and positively related to response inhibition on a go/no-go task. Our findings support the idea that a high perceptual load may be beneficial to Stroop performance because of the reduced processing of distractors but detrimental to performance on the go/no-go task because of interference with stimulus discrimination.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, L. E., Hoffer, L. J., Griffith, J., Waldo, M. C., & Freedman, R. (1992). Normalization by nicotine of deficient auditory sensory gating in the relatives of schizophrenics. Biological Psychiatry, 32, 607–616.
Adler, L. E., Waldo, M. C., & Freedman, R. (1985). Neurophysiologic studies of sensory gating in schizophrenia: Comparison of auditory and visual responses. Biological Psychiatry, 20, 1284–1296.
Arciniegas, D. B., Olincy, A., Topkoff, J., McRae, K., Cawthra, E., Filley, C. M., et al. (2000). Impaired auditory gating and P50 nonsuppression following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neuropsychiatry & Clinical Neuroscience, 12, 77–85.
Arciniegas, D. B., Topkoff, J. L., Rojas, D. C., Sheeder, J., Teale, P., Young, D. A., et al. (2001). Reduced hippocampal volume in association with P50 nonsuppression following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neuropsychiatry & Clinical Neuroscience, 13, 213–221. doi:10.1176/appi.neuropsych.13.2.213
Arnfred, S. M., Eder, D. N., Hemmingsen, R. P., Glenthøj, B. Y., & Chen, A. C. N. (2001). Gating of the vertex somatosensory and auditory evoked potential P50 and the correlation to skin conductance orienting response in healthy men. Psychiatry Research, 101, 221–235.
Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., Hachten, P. C., Usher, M., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). The “benefits” of distractibility: Mechanisms underlying increased Stroop effects in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 25, 749–762.
Barnhardt, J., Ritter, W., & Gomes, H. (2008). Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: An eventrelated brain potential study. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2071–2078. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.007
Bickford-Wimer, P. C., Nagamoto, H., Johnson, R., Adler, L. E., Egan, M., Rose, G. M., & Freedman, R. (1990). Auditory sensory gating in hippocampal neurons: A model system in the rat. Biological Psychiatry, 27, 183–192.
Braver, T. S., Gray, J. R., & Burgess, G. C. (2007). Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. In A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake, & J. N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 76–106). New York: Oxford University Press.
Brink, J. M., & McDowd, J. M. (1999). Aging and selective attention: An issue of complexity or multiple mechanisms? Journals of Gerontology, 54B, P30-P33.
Brumback, C. R., Low, K. A., Gratton, G., & Fabiani, M. (2004). Sensory ERPs predict differences in working memory span and fluid intelligence. NeuroReport, 15, 373–376.
Clementz, B. A., Geyer, M. A., & Braff, D. L. (1998). Poor P50 suppression among schizophrenia patients and their first-degree biological relatives. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 1691–1694.
Cohen, J. D., Barch, D. M., Carter, C., & Servan-Schreiber, D. (1999). Context-processing deficits in schizophrenia: Converging evidence from three theoretically motivated cognitive tasks. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 120–133.
Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332–361.
Croft, R. J., Lee, A., Bertolot, J., & Gruzelier, J. H. (2001). Associations of P50 suppression and desensitization with perceptual and cognitive features of “unreality]rd in schizotypy. Biological Psychiatry, 50, 441–446.
Cullum, C. M., Harris, J. G., Waldo, M. C., Smernoff, E., Madison, A., Nagamoto, H. T., et al. (1993). Neurophysiological and neuropsychological evidence for attentional dysfunction in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 10, 131–141.
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.
de Wilde, O. M., Bour, L. J., Dingemans, P. M., Koelman, J. H. T. M., & Linszen, D. H. (2007). A meta-analysis of P50 studies in patients with schizophrenia and relatives: Differences in methodology between research groups. Schizophrenia Research, 97, 137–151. doi:10.1016/ j.schres.2007.04.028
Donders, F. C. (1969). On the speed of mental processes. In W. G. Koster (Ed. & Trans.), Attention and performance II (pp. 412–431). Amsterdam: North-Holland. (Original work published 1868)
Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters on the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.
Erwin, R. J., Turetsky, B. I., Moberg, P., Gur, R. C., & Gur, R. E. (1998). P50 abnormalities in schizophrenia: Relationship to clinical and neuropsychological indices of attention. Schizophrenia Research, 33, 157–167.
Everett, J., Laplante, L., & Thomas, J. (1989). The selective attention deficit in schizophrenia: Limited resources or cognitive fatigue? Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 177, 735–738.
Freedman, R., Coon, H., Myles-Worsley, M., Orr-Urtreger, A., Olincy, A., Davis, A., et al. (1997). Linkage of a neurophysiological deficit in schizophrenia to a chromosome 15 locus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94, 587–592.
Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101–135.
Fuerst, D. R., Gallinat, J., & Boutros, N. N. (2007). Range of sensory gating values and test-retest reliability in normal subjects. Psychophysiology, 44, 620–626. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00524.x
Ghisolfi, E. S., Heldt, E., Zanardo, A. P., Strimitzer, I. M., Jr., Prokopiuk, A. S., Becker, J., et al. (2006). P50 sensory gating in panic disorder. Journal of Psychiatry Research, 40, 535–540. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.02.006
Gooding, D. C., Braun, J. G., & Studer, J. A. (2006). Attentional network task performance in patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: Evidence of a specific deficit. Schizophrenia Research, 88, 169–178. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2006.07.009
Gottesman, I. I., & Gould, T. D. (2003). The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: Etymology and strategic intentions. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 636–645. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.4.636
Grunwald, T., Boutros, N. N., Pezer, N., von Oertzen, J., Fernández, G., Schaller, C., & Elger, C. E. (2003). Neuronal substrates of sensory gating within the human brain. Biological Psychiatry, 53, 511–519.
Guterman, Y., & Josiassen, R. C. (1994). Sensory gating deviance in schizophrenia in the context of task related effects. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 18, 1–12.
Guterman, Y., Josiassen, R. C., & Bashore, T. R., Jr. (1992). Attentional influence on the P50 component of the auditory eventrelated brain potential. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 12, 197–209.
Heal, L., & Johnson, J. T., Jr. (1970). Inhibition deficits in retardate learning and attention. In N. Ellis, P. Siegel, & I. Bjorgen (Eds.), International review of research in mental retardation (pp. 107–149). New York: Academic Press.
Healey, M. K., Campbell, K. L., & Hasher, L. (2008). Cognitive aging and increased distractibility: Costs and potential benefits. Progress in Brain Research, 169, 353–363.
Jerger, K., Biggins, C., & Fein, G. (1992). P50 suppression is not affected by attentional manipulations. Biological Psychiatry, 31, 365–377.
Jessen, F., Kucharski, C., Fries, T., Papassotiropoulos, A., Hoenig, K., Maier, W., & Heun, R. (2001). Sensory gating deficit expressed by a disturbed suppression of the P50 event-related potential in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 1319–1321. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.158.8.1319
Kisley, M. A., Noecker, T. L., & Guinther, P. M. (2004). Comparison of sensory gating to mismatch negativity and self-reported perceptual phenomena in healthy adults. Psychophysiology, 41, 604–621.
Knight, R. T., Staines, W. R., Swick, D., & Chao, L. L. (1999). Prefrontal cortex regulates inhibition and excitation in distributed neural networks. Acta Psychologica, 101, 159–178.
Korzyukov, O., Pflieger, M. E., Wagner, M., Bowyer, S. M., Rosburg, T., Sundaresan, K., et al. (2007). Generators of the intracranial P50 response in auditory sensory gating. NeuroImage, 35, 814–826.
Kramer, A. F., Humphrey, D. G., Larish, J. F., Logan, G. D., & Strayer, D. L. (1994). Aging and inhibition: Beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention. Psychology & Aging, 9, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.9.4.491
Kurthen, M., Trautner, P., Rosburg, T., Grunwald, T., Dietl, T., Kühn, K., et al. (2007). Toward a functional topography of sensory gating areas: Invasive P50 recording and electrical stimulation mapping in epilepsy surgery candidates. Psychiatry Research, 155, 121–133.
Làdavas, E., Petronio, A., & Umiltà, C. (1990). The deployment of visual attention in the intact field of hemineglect patients. Cortex, 26, 307–317.
Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 451–468. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.451
Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 339–354. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.339
Ludbrook, J. (1998). Multiple comparison procedures updated. Clinical & Experimental Pharmacology & Physiology, 25, 1032–1037.
Lustig, C., Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (2007). Inhibitory deficit theory: Recent developments in a “new view.” In D. S. Gorfein & C. M. MacLeod (Eds.), Inhibition in cognition (pp. 145–162). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11587-008
Luu, P., & Ferree, T. (2005). Determination of the Geodesic Sensor Nets’ average electrode positions and their 10-10 international equivalents. (Tech. Note). Eugene, OR: Electrical Geodesics, Inc.
MacLeod, C. M., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Training and Stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 126–135. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.14.1.126
Marlow-O’Conner, M. A. (2005). f MRI indices of frontal activation associated with sensory gating deficits in schizophrenia. Dissertation Abstracts International, 66B, 3417.
McGhie, A., & Chapman, J. (1961). Disorders of attention and perception in early schizophrenia. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 34, 103–116.
Nagamoto, H. T., Adler, L. E., Hea, R. A., Griffith, J. M., McRae, K. A., & Freedman, R. (1996). Gating of auditory P50 in schizophrenics: Unique effects of clozapine. Biological Psychiatry, 40, 181–188.
Nagamoto, H. T., Adler, L. E., Waldo, M. C., Griffith, J., & Freedman, R. (1991). Gating of auditory response in schizophrenics and normal controls. Effects of recording site and stimulation interval on the P50 wave. Schizophrenia Research, 4, 31–40.
Nee, D. E., Wager, T. D., & Jonides, J. (2007). Interference resolution: Insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 1–17.
Neill, W. T. (1977). Inhibition and facilitation processes in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 444–450. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.3.3.444
Olincy, A., Ross, R. G., Harris, J. G., Young, D. A., McAndrews, M. A., Cawthra, E., et al. (2000). The P50 auditory event-related potential in adult attention-deficit disorder: Comparison with schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 47, 969–977.
Patterson, J. V., Hetrick, W. P., Boutros, N. N., Jin, Y., Sandman, C., Stern, H., et al. (2008). P50 sensory gating ratios in schizophrenics and controls: A review and data analysis. Psychiatry Research, 158, 226–247.
Persons, J. B. (1986). The advantages of studying psychological phenomena rather than psychiatric diagnoses. American Psychologist, 41, 1252–1260.
Picard, N., & Strick, P. L. (2001). Imaging the premotor areas. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 663–672.
Picton, T. W., Stuss, D. T., Alexander, M. P., Shallice, T., Binns, M. A., & Gillingham, S. (2007). Effects of focal frontal lesions on response inhibition. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 826–838.
Potter, D., Summerfelt, A., Gold, J., & Buchanan, R. W. (2006). Review of clinical correlates of P50 sensory gating abnormalities in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32, 692–700.
Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428.
Schwartz, S., Vuilleumier, P., Hutton, C., Maravita, A., Dolan, R. J., & Driver, J. (2005). Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: Modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 770–786.
Smith, D. A., Boutros, N. N., & Schwarzkopf, S. B. (1994). Reliability of P50 auditory event-related potential indices of sensory gating. Psychophysiology, 31, 495–502. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb01053.x
Steel, C., Haworth, E. J., Peters, E., Hemsley, D. R., Sharma, T., Gray, J. A., et al. (2001). Neuroimaging correlates of negative priming. NeuroReport, 12, 3619–3624.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. doi:10.1037/ h0054651
Talay-Ongan, A., & Wood, K. (2000). Unusual sensory sensitivities in autism: A possible crossroads. International Journal of Disability Development & Education, 47, 201–212. doi:10.1080/713671112
Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibition priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571–590.
Tregellas, J. R., Davalos, D. B., Rojas, D. C., Waldo, M. C., Gibson, L., Wylie, K., et al. (2007). Increased hemodynamic response in the hippocampus, thalamus and prefrontal cortex during abnormal sensory gating in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 92, 262–272.
Uc, E. Y., Skinner, R. D., Rodnitzky, R. L., & Garcia-Rill, E. (2003). The midlatency auditory evoked potential P50 is abnormal in Huntington’s disease. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 212, 1–5.
Venables, P. H. (1964). Input dysfunction in schizophrenia. Progress in Experimental Personality Research, 72, 1–47.
Waldo, M. C., Cawthra, E., Adler, L. E., Dubester, S., Staunton, M., Nagamoto, H., et al. (1994). Auditory sensory gating, hippocampal volume, and catecholamine metabolism in schizophrenics and their siblings. Schizophrenia Research, 12, 93–106.
Weisbrod, M., Kiefer, M., Marzinzik, F., & Spitzer, M. (2000). Executive control is disturbed in schizophrenia: Evidence from event- related potentials in a go/no-go task. Biological Psychiatry, 47, 51–60.
Weisser, R., Weisbrod, M., Roehrig, M., Rupp, A., Schroeder, J., & Scherg, M. (2001). Is frontal lobe involved in the generation of the auditory evoked P50? NeuroReport, 12, 3303–3307.
Wright, C. I., Keuthen, N. J., Savage, C. R., Martis, B., Williams, D., Wedig, M., et al. (2006). Brain correlates of negative and positive visuospatial priming in adults. NeuroImage, 30, 983–991.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yadon, C.A., Bugg, J.M., Kisley, M.A. et al. P50 sensory gating is related to performance on select tasks of cognitive inhibition. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 9, 448–458 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.9.4.448
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.9.4.448