Abstract
Human activity contains sequential dependencies that observers may use to structure a task environment (e.g., the ordering of steps when tying shoes or getting into a car). Two experiments investigated how people take advantage of sequential structure to understand activity and respond to behaviorally relevant events. Participants monitored animations of simplified human movement to identify target hand gestures. In the first experiment, participants were able to use predictive sequential dependencies to more quickly identify targets. In addition, performance was best at the point in time that followed the sequence. However, the second experiment revealed that how sequential structure affects detection depends on whether the sequence predicts the timing of target events. In all cases, sequence learning was observed without participants’ awareness of the sequential dependencies. These results suggest that human activity sequences can be learned without awareness and can be used to adaptively guide behavior.
Article PDF
References
Brown, J. W., & Braver, T. S. (2005). Learned predictions of error likelihood in the anterior cingulate cortex. Science, 307, 1118–1121.
Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 109–127.
Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257–271.
Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 458–467.
Gotler, A., Meiran, N., & Tzelgov, J. (2003). Nonintentional task set activation: Evidence from implicit task sequence learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 890–896.
Kirkham, N. Z., Slemmer, J. A., & Johnson, S. P. (2002). Visual statistical learning in infancy: Evidence for a domain general learning mechanism. Cognition, 83, B35-B42.
Newtson, D. (1973). Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 28, 28–38.
Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32.
Nobre, A. C. (2001). Orienting attention to instants in time. Neuropsychologia, 39, 1317–1328.
Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2001). Temporal contextual cuing of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1299–1313.
Parsons, L. M. (1987). Imagined spatial transformations of one’s hands and feet. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 178–241.
Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (1996). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 606–621.
Seger, C. A. (1994). Implicit learning. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 163–196.
Shiffrar, M., & Freyd, J. J. (1990). Apparent motion of the human body. Psychological Science, 1, 257–264.
Sokolov, E. N., Nezlina, N. I., Polyanskii, V. B., & Evtikhin, D. V. (2002). The orientating reflex: The “targeting reaction” and “searchlight of attention.” Neuroscience & Behavioral Physiology, 32, 347–362.
Turk-Browne, N. B., Jungé, J. A., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). The automaticity of visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 552–564.
Yu, A. J., & Dayan, P. (2005). Uncertainty, neuromodulation, and attention. Neuron, 46, 681–692.
Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., Swallow, K. M., Braver, T. S., & Reynolds, J. R. (2007). Event perception: A mind/brain perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 273–293.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Portions of this research were supported by NSF Grant 0236651 to J.M.Z.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Swallow, K.M., Zacks, J.M. Sequences learned without awareness can orient attention during the perception of human activity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 116–122 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.1.116
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.1.116