Abstract
Children with autism spectrum disorder process many perceptual and social events differently from typically developing children, suggesting that they may also form and recognize categories differently. We used a dot pattern categorization task and prototype comparison modeling to compare categorical processing in children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder and matched typical controls. We were interested in whether there were differences in how children with autism use average similarity information about a category to make decisions. During testing, the group with autism spectrum disorder endorsed prototypes less and was seemingly less sensitive to differences between to-be-categorized items and the prototype. The findings suggest that individuals with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder are less likely to use overall average similarity when forming categories or making categorical decisions. Such differences in category formation and use may negatively impact processing of socially relevant information, such as facial expressions. A supplemental appendix for this article may be downloaded from http://pbr.psychonomic-journals.org/content/supplemental.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (2005). Human category learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 149–178.
Bott, L., Brock, J., Brockdorff, N., Boucher, J., & Lamberts, K. (2006). Perceptual similarity in autism. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1237–1254.
Carrow-Woolfolk, E. (1999). Comprehension assessment of spoken language. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Forster, K. L., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116–124.
Gastgeb, H. Z., Rump, K. M., Best, C. A., Minshew, N. J., & Strauss, M. S. (2009). Prototype formation in autism: Can individuals with autism abstract facial prototypes? Autism Research, 2, 279–284.
Happe, F., & Frith, U. (2006). The weak coherence account: Detailfocused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 36, 5–25.
Hintzman, D. L. (1986). “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411–428.
Homa, D., Cross, J., Cornell, D., Goldman, D., & Schwartz, S. (1973). Prototype abstraction and classification of new instances as a function of number of instances defining the prototype. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101, 116–122.
Iarocci, G., & McDonald, J. (2006). Sensory integration and the perceptual experience of persons with autism. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 36, 77–90.
Johansen, M. K., & Palmeri, T. J. (2002). Are there representational shifts during category learning? Cognitive Psychology, 45, 482–553.
Just, M. A., Cherkassky, V. L., Keller, T. A., & Minshew, N. J. (2004). Cortical activation and synchronization during sentence comprehension in high-functioning autism: Evidence of underconnectivity. Brain, 127, 1811–1821.
Klinger, L. G., & Dawson, G. (2001). Prototype formation in autism. Development & Psychopathology, 13, 111–124.
Knowlton, B. J., & Squire, L. R. (1993). The learning of categories: Parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge. Science, 262, 1747–1749.
Lawson, J. (2003). Depth accessibility difficulties: An alternative conceptualization of autism spectrum conditions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 33, 189–202.
McCann, J., & Peppe, S. (2003). Prosody in autism spectrum disorders. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 38, 325–350.
McClelland, J. L. (2000). The basis of hyperspecificity in autism: A preliminary suggestion based on properties of neural nets. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 30, 497–502.
Minda, J. P., Desroches, A. S., & Church, B. A. (2008). Learning rule-described and non-rule-described categories: A comparison of children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 1518–1533.
Molesworth, C. J., Bowler, D. M., & Hampton, J. A. (2005). The prototype effect in recognition memory: Intact in autism? Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 46, 661–672.
Molesworth, C. J., Bowler, D. M., & Hampton, J. A. (2008). When prototypes are not best: Judgments made by children with autism. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 38, 1721–1730.
Mottron, L., & Burack, J. (2006). Autism: A different perception. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 36, 1–3.
Mottron, L., Dawson, M., Soulieres, I., Hubert, B., & Burack, J. (2006). Enhanced perceptual functioning in autism: An update, and eight principles of autistic perception. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 36, 27–43.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1984). Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 104–114.
O’Riordan, M. A., & Plaisted, K. C. (2001). Enhanced discrimination in autism. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 961–979.
Plaisted, K. C. (2001). Reduced generalization in autism: An alternative to weak central coherence. In J. A. Burack, T. Charman, N. Yirmiya, & P. R. Zelazo (Eds.), The development of autism: Perspectives from theories and research (pp. 149–169). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Plaisted, K. C., O’Riordan, M. A., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1998). Enhanced discrimination of novel highly similar stimuli by adults with autism during a perceptual learning task. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 39, 765–775.
Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353–363.
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.
Rutter, M., LeCouteur, A., & Lord, C. (2003). The Autism Diagnostic Interview—Revised (ADI—R). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Sasson, N. J. (2006). The development of face processing in autism. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 36, 381–394.
Schwarzer, G. (2000). Development of face processing: The effect of face inversion. Child Development, 71, 391–401.
Smith, J. D. (2002). Exemplar theory’s predicted typicality gradient can be tested and disconfirmed. Psychological Science, 13, 437–442.
Smith, J. D., Redford, J. S., & Haas, S. M. (2008). Prototype abstraction by monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 390–401.
Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (4th ed.). San Antonio: Psychological Corp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported in part by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health (Grant MH 67952), the NSF (Grant SBE 0542013 to the Temporal Dynamics of Learning Center), and the John R. Oishei Foundation.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Church, B.A., Krauss, M.S., Lopata, C. et al. Atypical categorization in children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Psychon Bull Rev 17, 862–868 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.6.862
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.6.862