Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Netherlands Reports to the XIth International Congress of Comparative Law Caracas 1982

  • Book
  • © 1982

Overview

Editors:
  1. Hans Ulrich

    1. Amsterdam, Netherlands

    View editor publications

    You can also search for this editor in PubMed   Google Scholar

  2. Jessurun D’Oliveira

    1. Amsterdam, Netherlands

    View editor publications

    You can also search for this editor in PubMed   Google Scholar

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

Log in via an institution
eBook USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (23 chapters)

  1. Front Matter

    Pages I-IX
    Download chapter PDF

  2. The development of folk property laws in complex societies: An overview of Dutch scholarship, with special references to the property law of the Minangkabau, West Sumatra

    • Franz Von Benda-Beckmann
    Pages 1-18

  3. La logique juridique et l’activité judiciaire aux Pays-Bas

    • H. Ph. Visser ’t Hooft
    Pages 19-35

  4. The use of comparative law by the legislator in the Netherlands

    • Jan M. van Dunné
    Pages 37-67

  5. Le placement d’enfants dans les familles de remplacement aux Pays-Bas

    • M. Rood-De Boer
    Pages 69-98

  6. The Dutch law of pretium doloris

    • Frans J. A. Van Der Velden
    Pages 99-123

  7. Le droit applicable à la détermination de la personne physique ou morale qui contrôle une société anonyme dont une filiale a son activité à l’étranger

    • D. Kokkini-Iatridou
    Pages 125-147

  8. Le régime juridique applicable aux rapports de travail sur le plan international

    • C. J. J. Van Maanen
    Pages 149-165

  9. Le défaut et l’opposition

    • Taco Sterk
    Pages 167-184

  10. La responsabilité des juges

    • H. Winkel
    Pages 185-206

  11. Législation agricole des Pays-Bas

    • G. Heida
    Pages 207-225

  12. Co-operation according to Dutch law

    • A. N. Huizenga
    Pages 227-239

  13. Abus d’information préalable en droit néerlandais

    • B. Wachter, Jos Netten
    Pages 241-256

  14. Piped transportation in the Netherlands

    • Ch. P. Verwer
    Pages 257-267

  15. Computer programs as subject matter of intellectual property rights

    • D. W. F. Verkade
    Pages 269-278

  16. Use of industrial property as a clandestine cartel

    • M. Van Empel
    Pages 279-304

  17. The legal status of Hovercraft in the Netherlands

    • Wybo P. Heere
    Pages 305-310

  18. The role and powers of the council of ministers

    • Inge C. Van Der Vlies
    Pages 311-326

  19. The unique Dutch broadcasting system on the eve of the revolution in teletechnics and the freedom of information

    • Herman Cohen Jehoram
    Pages 327-343

  20. Conscientious objections in the Netherlands

    • E. A. Alkema
    Pages 345-358
Back to top

Keywords

About this book

Last year I addressed the Netherlands Comparative Law Asso­ ciation with the following question: 'Does Comparative Law Exist At All?' (My intention then was to flog the dead (?) horse of the merger of comparative law and the sociology of law. ) In presenting this voluminous collection of Netherlands national reports to the eleventh congress of the Internatio­ nal Academy of Comparative Law I feel my misgivings giving way to the suspicion, that comparative law indeed exists. Of course national reports do not, as such, prove the exist­ ence of comparative law. It is the general reports together with the national reports, which embody the comparative effort. That is why the Netherlands Comparative Law Associa­ tion took the initiative to propose the publishing of the materials on a subject to subject basis instead of publish­ ing collections of national reports. From a comparative legal point of view, it is the topic that should form the basis of the publication, and not the origin of the materials. The general reporter for each topic should be prepared to take up the responsabilities of editing the volume, and would have to be given the right to select those national reports which he considers to be useful both in regard to their quality and the relevance of the material to the basic problems in the questionnaire. This proposal met with very favourable comments from the na­ tional committees and general reporters of some fifteen coun­ tries.

Editors and Affiliations

  • Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Hans Ulrich, Jessurun D’Oliveira

Bibliographic Information

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Back to top

Search

Navigation