This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Auwärter, M., & Kirsch, E. (1982). Zur Entwicklung interaktiver Fähigkeiten— Begegnungskonstitution und Verhaltenssynchronie in der frühen Kindheit. Zeitschrift für Pudagogik, 28, 273–298.
Bauersfeld, H. (1980). Hidden dimensions in the so-called reality of a mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11, 23–41.
Bauersfeld, H. (1988). Interaction, construction, and knowledge—Alternative perspectives for mathematics education. In T. Cooney & D. Grouws D. (Eds.), Effective mathematics teaching (pp. 27–46). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Bauersfeld, H. (in press). “Language games” in mathematics classroom—Their function and the education of teachers. In Final report of the project the coordination of psychological and sociological analyses in mathematics education.
Bauersfeld, H., Krummheuer, G., & Voigt, J. (1988). Interactional theory of learning and teaching mathematics and related microethnographical studies. In H. G. Steiner, & A. Vermandel (Eds.), Foundations and methodology of the discipline mathematics education (pp. 174–188). Antwerpen: University of Antwerpen.
Beck, C., & Maier, H. (1994). Mathematikdidaktik als Textwissenschaft. Zum Status von Texten als Grundlage empirischer mathematikdidaktischer Forschung. Journal fur Mathematikdidaktik, 15 (1, 2), 35–79.
Becker, J. (1981). Differential treatment of females and males in mathematics classes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12 (1), 40–53
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Burton, L. (1986). Femmes et mathematiques: y-a-il une intersection? In L. Lafortune (Ed.), Femmes et mathematiques (pp. 19–56). Montreal: Les Editions du remuemenage.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1991). A constructivist approach to second grade mathematics. In E. von Glasersfeld (Ed.), Constructivism in mathematics education (pp. 157–176). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1992). Interaction and learning in mathematics classroom situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 99–122.
Damarin, S. (1990). Teaching mathematics: A geminist perspective. In T. J. Cooney & C. R. Hirsh (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics in 1990: 1990 yearbook (pp. 144–151). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
de Laurentis, T. (Ed.). (1986). Feminist studies/Critical studies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Dick, A. (1992). Die Problematik der Koedukation im mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht. In A. Grabosch, A. Zwölfer (Eds.), Frauen und Mathematik. Die allmähliche Rückeroberung der Normalität? (pp. 114–134). Tübingen: Attempto.
Eccles, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. (1985). Classroom experiences and student gender: Arc there differences and do they matter? In L. C. Wilkinson & C. B. Marrett (Eds.), Gender influences in classroom interaction (pp. 79–115). Orlando: Academic Press.
Enders-Dragasser, U., & Fuchs, C. (1989). Interaktionen der Geschlechter. Sexismusstrukturen in der Schule. Weinheim und Miinchen: Juventa.
Fennema, E. (1989). The study of affect and mathematics: A proposed generic model for research. In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective (pp. 205–219) New York: Springer.
Fennema, E. (1993). Mathematics, gender, and research. Paper presented at the ICMI Conference, Gender and Mathematics Education, Här, Sweden, October, 1993.
Fennema E., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teacher-student interactions and sex-related differences in learning mathematics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2 (1), 19–42.
Fennema, E., Peterson, P., Carpenter, T., & Lubinski, C. (1990). Teachers’ attributions and beliefs about girls. boys, and mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21, 55–69
Forman, E. (1989). The role of peer interaction in the social construction of mathematicsl knowledge. International Journal of Educational Research, 1, 55–70.
Frey, D., & Greif, S. (Eds.). (1987). Sozialpsychologie. Ein Handbuch in Schlüsselbegriffen. München-Weinheim: Psychologic Verlags Union.
Garfinkel. H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Jacobs, J. (1994). Feminist pedagogy and mathematics. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 26 (1), 12–17.
Jungwirth, H. (1991a). Interaction and gender — Findings of a microethnographical approach to classroom discourse. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 263–284.
Jungwirth, H. (1991b). Mathematische Kompetenz als soziales Phänomen. mathematica didactica, 14 (1), 30–45.
Jungwirth, H. (1992). Wahl einer mathetnatisch-naturwissenschaftlich-techriischern Studienrichtung und schulische Herkunft bei Frauen. Linz: Eigenverlag.
Jungwirth, H. (1993). Routines in classroom discourse: An ethnomethodological approach. European Journal of Psychology of Education, VIII (4), 375–387.
Kallmeyer, W., & Schutze, F. (1976). Konversationsanalyse. In Studium Linguistik (pp. 1–29). Kronberg: Taunus.
Kessler, S., & McKenna, W. (1978). Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kimball, M. (1993). Research perspectives. Paper presented at the ICMI conference, Gender and Mathematics Education, Höör, Sweden, October, 1993.
Koehler, M. S. (1990). Classrooms. teachers and gender differences in mathematics. In E. Fennema & G. Leder (Eds.), Mathematics and gender. New York: Teachers College Press.
Krummheuer, G. (1982). Rahmenanalyse zum Unterricht einer achten Klasse über “Termumformungen”. In H. Bauersfeld et al. (Eds.), IDM— Reihe Untersuchungen zum Mathematikuntericht. Band 5 Analysen zum Unterrichtshandeln (pp. 41–103). Köln: Aulis.
Krummheuer, G. (1992). Lernen mit “Format”. Elemente einer interaktionistischen Lerntheorie. Diskutiert an Beispielen mathematischen Unterrichts. Weinheim: Deutscher Studienverlag
Krummheuer, G. (1993). The ethnography of argumentation (Occasional paper 148). Bielefeld: IDM
Leder, G. (1990). Gender and classroom practice. In L. Burton (Ed.), Gender and mathematics. An international perspective (pp. 9–20). Strand: Cassell.
Leiter, K. (1980). A primer on ethnomethodogy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Maier, H. (1991). Analyse von Schülerverstehen im Unterrichtsgeschehen — Fragestellungen, Verfahren und Beispiele. In H. Maier & J. Voigt (Eds.), Interprtative Unterrichtsforschung. IDM-Reihe Untersuchungen zum Mathematikunterricht Band, 17 (pp. 117–151). Köln: Aulis.
Maltz, D. N., & Borker, R. A. (1982). A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication. In J. Gumperz (Ed.), Language arid social identity (pp. 197–217) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Menachcr, P. (1994). Erklärungsansätze fur geschlechtsspezifische Interessens-und Leistungsunterschiede in Mathematik, Naturwissenschaften und Technik. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 26 (1), 1–11.
Meyer, M. R., & Fennema, E. (1988). Girls, boys, and bathematics. In T. R. Post (Ed.), Teaching mathematics in grades K-8: Research-based methods (pp. 406–425). Newton, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Moi, T. (1989). Patriarchal thought and the drive for knowledge. In T. Brennan (Ed.), Betweenfeminism and psychoanalysis (pp. 189–205). London/New York: Routledge.
Parsons, J. E., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Perspectives on achievement and achievement motivations. San Francisco: Freeman.
Parsons, J. E., Adler, T. F., & Kaczala, C. M. (1982). Socialization of achievement attitudes and beliefs: Parental influences. In Child Development, 53, 310–321.
Sacks, H. (1974). An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In R. Bauman & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 337–353). New YorK/London: Cambridge University Press.
Saxe, G. B. (1990). Culture and cognitve development: Studies in mathematical understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schor, N. (1989). This essentialism that is not one: Coming to grips with Irigaray. Differences, 2 (1), 38–58.
Schütz, A. (1971). Gesammelte Aufsätze. Band I. Den Haag: Nijhoff.
Stallings, J. (1985). School, classroom, and home influences on women’s decisions to enroll in advanced mathematics courses. In S. F. Chipman, L. R. Brush, & D. M. Wilson (Eds.), Women and mathematics: Balancing the equation (pp. 199–224). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Steinbring, H. (1991). Mathematics in teaching processes: The disparity between teacher and student knowledge. Recherches en didactique des mathématiques, 11 (1), 65–108.
Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand. Women and men in conversation. New York: W. Morrow & Company.
Thürmer-Rohr, C. (1992). Vagabundinnen. Feministische Essays. Berlin: Orlanda Frauenverlag.
Ulich, D. (1976). Pädagogische Interaktion. Theorien erzieherischen Haridelns und sozialen Lernens. Weinheim und Basel: Beltz.
Voigt, J. (1984). Interaktionsmuster und Routinen im Mathematikunterricht. Weinheim und Basel: Beltz.
Voigt, J. (1989). Social functions of routines and consequences for subject matter learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 647–656.
Voight, J. (1994). Negotiation of mathematical meaning and learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 275–298.
Walkerdine, V. (1989). The girls and mathematics unit: Counting girls out. London: Virago Press.
Wilson, T. (198I). Theorien der Interaktion und Modelle soziologischer Erklärung. In Arbeitsgruppe Bielefelder Soziologen (Eds.), Alltagswissen, Interaktion und gesellschaftliche Wirklichkeit (pp. 54–80). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jungwirth, H. (1996). Symbolic Interactionism and Ethnomethodology as a Theoretical Framework for the Research on Gender and Mathematics. In: Hanna, G. (eds) Towards Gender Equity in Mathematics Education. New ICMI Study Series, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47205-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47205-8_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-3921-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47205-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive