This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Birenbaum, M., & Dochy, F. (Eds.). (1996). Alternatives in Assessment of Achievement, Learning Processes and prior Knowledge. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Boekaerts, M. (2002, in press). Toward a Model that integrates Affect and Learning, Monograph published by The British Journal of Educational Psychology.
Entwistle, N. J. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment. Introduction to the special issue. Higher Education, 22, 201–204.
Hambleton, R. K. (2001). Setting performance standards on educational assessments and criteria for evaluating the process. In G.J. Cizek (Ed.), Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers
Hounsell, D. (1997a). Contrasting conceptions of essay-writing. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning. Implications for teaching and studying in higher education [second edition] (pp. 106–126). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
Hounsell, D. (1997b). Understanding teaching and teaching for understanding. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning. Implications for teaching and studying in higher education [second edition] (pp. 238–258). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
Kulieke, M., Bakker, J., Collins, C., Fennimore, T., Fine, C., Herman, J., Jones, B.F., Raack, L., & Tinzmann, M. B. (1990). Why Should Assessment Be Rased on a Vision of Learning? North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL), Oak Brook.
Linn, R. L., Baker, E., & Dunbar, S. B. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, 16, 1–21.
Messick, S. (1995). Standards of Validity and the Validity of Standards in Performance Assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, Winter 1995, 5–8.
Plake, B. S., & Impara, J. C. (1996). Intrajudge consistency using the Angoff standard setting method. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York, NY.
Pellegrino, J. W., Jones, L. R., & Mitchell, K. J. (Eds.). (1999). Grading the nation’s report card. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Brown, S. (1997). “But is it fair?”: an exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(4), 349–371.
Schmitt, A. (1999). The Optimized Extended Response Standard Setting Method. Technical Report, Psychometric Division. Albany, NY: Regents College.
William, D. (1997). Construct-referenced assessment of authentic tasks: alternatives to norms and criteria. Paper presented at the 7th Conference of the European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction. Athens, Greece. August 26–30.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Segers, M., Dochy, F., Cascallar, E. (2003). The Era of Assessment Engineering: Changing Perspectives on Teaching and Learning and the Role of New Modes of Assessment. In: Segers, M., Dochy, F., Cascallar, E. (eds) Optimising New Modes of Assessment: In Search of Qualities and Standards. Innovation and Change in Professional Education, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48125-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48125-1_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1260-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48125-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive