Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Fundamental Theories of Physics ((FTPH,volume 129))

  • 462 Accesses

Abstract

The question of relationships between mathematical structures and language analysis in epistemology is considered briefly in the framework of a program for a formalized epistemology.

See “Important Note” on p. xviii.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. D. Sneed, “Philosophical problems in the empirical science of science: A formal approach,” Erkenntnis 10, 115 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. S. Kuhn, “Theory change as structure-change: Comments on the Sneed formalism,” Erkenntnis 10, 179 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. W. Stegmüller, “A combined approach to the dynamics of theories. How to improve historical intepretations of theory change by applying set theoretical structures,” in The Structure and Development of Science, G. Radnitsky and G. Anderson, eds. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  4. G.-G. Granger, Pour la connaissance philosophique (Odile Jacob, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G.-G. Granger, Formes, operations, objets (Vrin, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Bailly, “Sur le statut contemporain du concept ď‘objet-scientifique’”, Rev. Int. Syst. 9 (4), 385 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. Bailly and J. Petitot, “Les mathématiques, de la diversité a ľunification,” Encyclopedia Universalis, Symposium (1990), p. 700.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Petitot, “Logique transcendantale: Synthétique a priori et herméneutique mathématique des objectivités,” Fundamenta Scientiae 10, 1 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Petitot, “Idéalités mathématiques et Réalité objective. Approche transcendantale,” in Hommage à Jean-Toussaint Desanti, G. Granel, ed. (TER, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.-M. Salanskis, Ľherméneutique formelle (Editions du CNRS, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bailly, F. (2003). Remarks about the Program for a Formalized Epistemology. In: Mugur-Schächter, M., van der Merwe, A. (eds) Quantum Mechanics, Mathematics, Cognition and Action. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 129. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48144-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48144-8_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1120-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48144-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics