Abstract
We ponder the kind of problems and perspectives of a “formalized epistemology”, by considering the advantages than one get from a concern with the “formal”, with its structural orientation, that would favour comprehensive, unifying and synthetic, intelligibility. We confront this perspective with that of the changes in knowledge, considering the relation between form and meaning for knowledge contents, and examine the notion of “epistemic operation” as instrumental for creating new forms, at the theoretical and meta-theoretical levels. Actually, the notions of form, of formal and of object are not independent of the problem of a subject that decides on conventions and choices. “Epistemic operations” might suggest a link with “algorithmic functions” for knowledge statements, that themselves entail the risk of reductionism in a naturalistic conception of representation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
A. Ashtekhar, “Non-perturbative quantum gravity: A status report,” in M. Cerdonio and R. Rianci, eds., General Relativity and Gravitation (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989).
J. Audoze, P. Musset, and M. Paty, eds., Les particules et ľunivers (Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1990).
F. Bailly, “About the emergence of invariants in physics: From’ substantial’ conservation to formal invariance,” in Mugur-Schächter and van der Merwe A., eds., this book (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2003) [56].
F. Bailly, “Remarks about the program for a formal epistemology,” in Mugur-Schächter and van der Merwe A., eds., this book (Kluwer. Academic, Dordrecht, 2003) [56].
B. Barnes and D. Bloor, 1982, “Relativism, rationalism and the sociology of knowledge,” in Hollis, Luckes, 1982, pp. 21–47.
J. S. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (University Press, Cambridge, 1987).
L. M. Brown, A. Pais, and B. Pippard, eds., Twentieth Century Physics, Vols. 1,2,3 (Philadephia Institute of Physics, New York, 1995).
M. Bunge, Philosophy of Physics (Dordrecht, Reidel, 1973).
M. Bunge, Epistémologie (Maloine, Paris, 1983).
R. Carnap, Die Aufgabe der Wissenschaftslogik (Vienna, 1934), translation of Le problème de la logique de la science (Hermann, Paris, 1935).
R. Carnap, Logical Foundations of Probability (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1950).
R. Carnap, Philosophical Foundations of Physics (Basic Books, New York, 1966).
E. Cassirer, Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff (Bruno Cassirer, Berlin, 1910); translation: Substance and Function, in Cassirer [14], pp. 1–346.
E. Cassirer, Substance and Function and Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, English translation by W. C. Swabey and M. C. Swabey (Open Court, Chicago, 1923; Dover, New York, 1953).
E. Cassirer, Philosophie der symbolischeen Formen, 3 volumes (Berlin, 1923, 1925, 1929); transl. by O. Hansen-Love and J. Lacoste, La philosophie des formes symboliques, 3 volumes (Minuit, Paris, 1972).
J. P. Changeux, Ľhomme neuronal (Fayard, Paris, 1983.)
J. P. Changeux and P. Ricœur, La nature et la règle. Ce qui nous fait penser (Odile Jacob, Paris, 1997).
R. Cohen, M. Horne, and J. Stachel, eds., Experimental Metaphysics: Quantum Mechanical Studies for Abner Shimony, Vol. One (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1997).
R. Cohen, M. Horne, and J. Stachel, eds., Potentiality, Entanglement and Passion-at-a-Distance: Quantum Mechanical Studies for Abner Shimony, Vol. Two (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1997).
A. Cupani, “Julgamento cientifico e racionalidade,” in Dutra, ed., Nos limites da Epistimolegia Analitica (NEL, Florianopolis, 1999), pp. 139–159.
A. R. Damasio, Descartes’ Error. Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain (Grosset, 1994).
P. A. M. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Clarendon, Oxford, 1930; 4th edn., 1958; revised 1981).
A. Einstein, “Spezielle Relativitätstheorie” (manuscript on the special theory of relativity, unpublished because of the war, prepared in 1912 for the Handbuch der Radiologie, E. Marx, ed.; copy at Einstein Archives), in Ref. [24], Vol. 4, pp. 3–108.
A. Einstein, The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Vols. 1–8, J. Stachel et al., eds. (University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1987–1998).
A. Einstein, H. A. Lorentz, H. Minkowski, and H. Weyl, Das Relativitätsprinzip, 4th edn., A. Sommerfeld, ed. (Teubner, Leipzig, 1922); translation by W. Perrett and G. B. Jeffery, The Principle of Relativity (Methuen, London, 1923; Dover, New York, 1952).
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?,” Phys. Rev. 47, 770–780 (1935).
B. ďEspagnat, Le réel voilé. Analyse des concepts quantiques (Fayard, Paris, 1994).
H. Focillon, La Vie des Formes, suivi de Eloge de la main (Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1981, 1990).
M. Foucault, Ľarchéologie du savoir (Gallimard, Paris, 1969).
R. Giere, Explaining Science. A Cognitive Approach (University Press, Chicago, 1988).
G. G. Granger, Essai ďune philosophie du style (Armand Colin, Paris, 1968; Odile Jacob, Paris, 1988).
G. G. Granger, Pour la connaissance philosophique (Odile Jacob, Paris, 1988).
G. G. Granger, Formes, opérations, objets (Vrin, Paris, 1994).
G. G. Granger, Le probable, le possible et le virtuel (Odile Jacob, Paris, 1995).
J. Hadamard, An Essay on the Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field (University Press, Princeton, 1945).
H. Hahn, O. Neurath, and R. Carnap, Wissenschaftlische Weltauflassung der Wiener Kreis (Vienna, 1929); reprinted in Neurath [1979], pp. 81–101; see [120]
W. R. Hamilton, “On a general method in dynamics,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. (London) 1934; reprinted in [38], Vol. 2.
W. R. Hamilton, The Mathematical Papers of Sir William Rowland Hamilton, 3 volumes (University Press, Cambridge, 1931, 1940, 1967).
R. C. Jeffrey, Studies in Inductive Logic and Probabilities, 2 volumes (Berkeley, 1980).
I. Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Hartknoch, Riga, 1781); 2nd modified edn., 1787; translation by Alexandre J. L. Delamarre and Franois Marty, “Critique de la raison pure,” in Emmanuel, Kant, Oeuvres philosophiques, Vol. 1 (Gallimard, Paris, 1980), pp. 705–1470.
J. Kouneiher, Epistémologie et histoire récente de la gravitation quantique, Doctoral Thesis in Epistemology and History of Sciences, Université Paris 7-Denis Diderot, 1998.
J. L. Lagrange, Mécanique analytique (Desaint, Paris, 1788; 2nd edn., 1811); reprinted in Oeuvres complètes de Lagrange, Vols. 11 and 12, published by J. A. Serret and G. Darboux (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1889).
I. Lakatos, Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1: The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, J. Worrall and G. Currie, eds. (University Press, Cambridge, 1978).
I. Lakatos, and A. Musgrave, eds., Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Proceedings, International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London, 1965, Vol. 4 (University Press, Cambridge, 1970).
A. Lalande, Vocabulaire technique et critique de la philosophie (1926), 13th edn. (Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1980).
P. Langevin, “Ľévolution de ľe space et du temps,” Scientia (Bologna) 10, 31–54 (1911) (conférence au Congrès de philosophie de Bologne, 1911); reprinted in Langevin [48], pp. 265–300.
P. Langevin, “Le temps, ľespace et la causalité dans la physique moderne,” Bulletin de la Société francaise de philosophie 12, 1–46 (1911); reprinted in Langevin [48], pp. 301–344.
P. Langevin, La physique depuis vingt ans (Doin, Paris, 1923).
C. Levi-Strauss, Anthropologie structurale (Plon, Paris, 1958).
H. Margenau, Physics and Philosophy: Selected Essays (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1978).
H. Minkowski, “Das Relativitätsprinzip,” lecture in Göttingen, 5.11.1907; posthumous publication arranged by A. Sommerfeld, Ann. Phys. 47, 927–938 (1915).
H. Minkowski, “Raum und Zeit,” lecture at the 80th Meeting of German scientists and physicians, Cologne 21.9.1908; Physikal. Z. 10, 104–111 (1909). “Space and Time,” Einstein et al. [25], pp. 73–91.
M. Mugur-Schächter, “From quantum mechanics to universal structures of conceptualization and feedback on quantum mechanics,” Found. Phys. 23, 37–122 (1993).
M. Mugur-Schächter, “Une méthode de conceptualisation relativisée: vers une épistémologie formelle apte à faire face aux complexités,” Revue Internationale de Systémique 9 (2), 269–303 (1995).
M. Mugur-Schächter, “Les leçons de la mécanique quantique (vers une épistémologie formelle),” Le Débat 94, 169–192 (1996).
M. Mugur-Schächter and A. van der Merwe, eds., this book (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2003).
J. von Neumann, Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik (Springer, Berlin, 1932); transltion by Alexandre Proca, Les fondements mathématiques de la mécanique quantique (Librairie Alcan & Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1947).
E. Nœther, “Invarianten beliebiger Differentialausdrücke,” Nachr. Königl. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen, Math. Phys. Kl., 1918, pp. 235–257; in Noether [60], pp. 240–247.
E. Nœther, “Invariante variationprobleme,” ibid., pp. 235–257; reprinted in Noether [60], pp. 248–270; translation by M. A. Tavel, Transport Theory and Statistical Physics 1, 183–207 (1971).
E. Nœther, Collected Papers, N. Jacobson, ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1983).
OULIPO (Ouvroir de Littérature potentielle), Littérature potentielle: créations, re-créations, récréations (Gallimard, Paris, 1977).
B. Pascal, “De ľesprit géométrique,” in Pascal, Oeuvres complètes, Présentation et Notes de Louis Lafuma (Seuil, Paris, 1993), pp. 348–355.
M. Paty, “La non-séparabilité locale et ľobjet de la théorie physique,” Fundamenta Scientiae 7, 47–87 (1986).
M. Paty, La matière dérobée. ľappropriation critique de ľobjet de la physique contemporaine (Archives contemporaines, Paris, 1988).
M. Paty, “Sur la notion de complétude ďune théorie physique”, in N. Fleury, Joffily, Sergio, J. A. Martins Simes, and A. Troper, eds., Leite Lopes Festchrift: A Pioneer Physicist in the Third World; dedicated to J. Leite Lopes on the occasion of his seventieth birthday (World Scientific, Singapore, 1988), pp. 143–164.
M. Paty, Ľanalyse critique des sciences, ou le tétraèdre épistémologique (sciences, philosophie, épistémologie, histoire des sciences) (ĽHarmattan, Paris, 1990).
M. Paty, “Ľendoréférence ďune science formalisée de la nature,” in C. Dilworth, ed., Intelligibility in Science (Rodopi, Amsterdam, 1992), pp. 73–110.
M. Paty, Einstein philosophe. La physique comme pratique philosophique (Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1993).
M. Paty, “Mesure, expérience et objet théorique en physique,” in J.-C. Beaune, ed., La mesure, instruments et philosophies (Champ Vallon, Seyssel, 1994), pp. 159–174.
M. Paty, “Le caractère historique de ľadéquation des mathématiques à la physique,” in S. Garma, D. Flament, and V. Navarro, eds., Contra los titanes de la rutina—Contre les titans de la routine (encuentro en Madrid de investigadores hispano-franceses sobre la historia y la filosofia de la matematica Rencontre à Madrid de chercheurs hispano-franais sur ľhistoire et la philosophie de la mathématique, 18–22.11.1991) (Comunidad de Madrid/C.S.I.C., Madrid, 1994), pp. 401–428.
M. Paty, “Sur ľhistoire du problème du temps: le temps physique et les phénomènes,” in E. Klein and M. Spiro, eds., Le temps et sa flèche (Frontières, Gif-sur-Yvette, 1994; 2nd edn., 1995). (Collection Champs, Flammarion, Paris, 1996, pp. 21–58.
M. Paty, “The nature of Einstein’s objections to the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics,” Found. Phys. 25, 183–204 (1995).
M. Paty, “Poincaré et le principe de relativité,” in J.-L. Greffe, G. Heinzmann, and K. Lorenz, eds., Henri Poincaré. Science et philosophie. Science and philosophy. Wissenscchaft und Philosophie. Congrès international, Nancy, France, 14–18 mai 1984 (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin/Albert Blanchard, Paris, 1996), pp. 101–143.
M. Paty, “Le style ďEinstein, la nature du travail scientifique et le problème de la découverte,” Revue philosophique de Louvain 94, 447–470 (1996).
M. Paty, “Predicate of existence and predictivity for a theoretical object in physics,” in E. Agazzi, ed., Realism and Quantum Physics (Rodopi, Amsterdam, 1997), pp. 97–130.
M. Paty, “Philosophie et physique,” in J.-F. Mattéi, ed., Le Discours philosophique, volume 4 de ľEncyclopédie philosophique universelle (Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1998), pp. 2104–2122.
M. Paty, “Universality of science: Historical validation of a philosophical idea,” in S. I. Habib and D. Raina, eds., Situating the History of Science: Dialogues with Joseph Needham (Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 1998), Chap. 12.
M. Paty, “La place des principes dans la physique mathématique au sens de Poincaré,” in J. Sebestik and A. Soulez, eds., “Actes du Colsloque France-Autriche Paris, mai 1995, Interférences et transformations dans la philosophie francaise et autrichienne (Mach, Poincaré, Duhem, Boltzmann),” Fundamenta philosophiae (Nancy) 3 (2), 61–74 (1998–1999).
M. Paty, “La création scientifique selon Poincaré et Einstein,” in M. Serfati, ed., La recherche delavérité (Collection Ecriture des Mathématiques, Éditions ACL, Paris, 1999), pp. 241–280.
M. Paty, “Paul Langevin (1872–1946), la relativité et les quanta,” Bulletin de la Société Franaise de Physique 119, 15–20 (1999).
M. Paty, “Are quantum systems physical objects with physical properties?,” Eur. J. Phys. 20, 373–388 (1999).
M. Paty, “Cosmologie et matière quantiquea,” in J. Seidengart and J.-J. Sczeciniarz, eds., Cosmologie et philosophie. En hommage à Jacques Merleau-Ponty; Epistémologiques (Paris, Sao Paulo) 1, 219–249 (2000).
M. Paty, “Interprétations et significations en physique quantique,” Revue Internationale de philosophie 54, 199–242 (2000).
M. Paty, “Langevin, Poincaré et Einstein,” in Paul Langevin, son œuvre et sa pensée. (Paris, São Paulo, forthcoming).
M. Paty, “The quantum and the classical domains as (provisional) parallel coexistents,” in S. French, D. Krause, and F. Doria, eds. (festschrift in honour of Newton da Costa, on the occasion of his seventieth birthday), Synthese 125, 179–200 (2000).
M. Paty, “The concept of quantum state: New views on old phenomena,” in R. S. Cohen, and J. Renn, eds., John Stachel Festschrift (Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, Kluwer, Dordrecht, forthcoming).
M. Paty, “The idea of quantity at the origin of the legitimacy of mathematization in physics,” in C. Gould, ed., Conference on the Philosophy of Marx Wartofsky, New School University, New York, March 6, 1999.
M. Paty, “Ľanalogie mathématique au sens de Poincaré et sa fonction en physique”, in M.-J. Durand-Richard, ed., Le statut de ľanalogie dans la ďmarche scientifique (Editions du CNRS, Paris, forthcoming).
M. Paty, Einstein, les quanta et le réel. Critique et construction théorique, in the press.
G. Perec, La disparition (Denoël, Paris, 1969; Gallimard, Paris, 1989)
H. Poincaré, “Sur les rapports de ľanalyse pure et de la physique mathématique, Acta Mathematica 21, 331–341 (1897); reprinted in Poincaré [98], pp. 17–30; “Les rapports de ľanalyse et de la physique mathématique”, Revue générale des sciences pures et appliquées 8, 857–861 (1987); reprinted in Poincaré [93], Chap. 5 (“Ľanalyse et la physique”), 1970 edn., pp. 103–113.
H. Poincaré, “Sur la dynamique de ľélectron” (received July 23, 1905), Rendiconti del Circolo matematico di Palermo XXI 129–176 (1906); also in Poincaré [97], Vol. 9, pp. 494–550.
H. Poincaré, Science et méthode (Flammarion, Paris, 1908, 1918).
H. Poincaré, “Le choix des faits,” The Monist, 1909, 231–232; reprinted in Poincaré [93], Book 1, Chap. 1, 1918 edn., pp. 16–18.
H. Poincaré, “Ľespace et letemps,” Scientia XXV, 159–170 (1912); also in Poincaré [96], 1963 edn., pp. 97–109.
H. Poincaré, Dernières pensées (Flammarion, Paris, 1913, 1963).
H. Poincaré, Oeuvres, 11 volumes (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1950–1965).
H. Poincaré, Ľanalyse et la recherche, selection of texts with an introduction by G. Ramunni (Hermann, Paris, 1991).
K. Popper, Logik der Forschung. Zur Erkenntnisstheorie der modernen Naturwissenschaft (Springer, Wien, 1934); re-edited with additions, 1966; translation: The Logic of Scientific Discovery (Hutchinson, London, 1959, 1968).
K. Popper, Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach (Claredon, Oxford, 1972).
K. Popper, Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics, from the Postscript to the Logic of Scientific Discovery, Vol. 3 (Hutchinson, London, 1982; written in 1956).
K. Popper, Realism and the Aim of Science, from the Postscript to the Logic of Scientific Discovery, Vol. 1, W. W. Bartley III, ed. (Hutchinson, London, 1983; written in 1956).
J. Proust, Questions de forme. Logique et proposition analytique de Kant à Carnap (Fayard, Paris, 1986).
H. Reichenbach, Experience and Prediction (University Press, Chicago, 1938).
H. Reichenbach, The Rise of Scientific Philosophy (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1951; re-edited 1973).
H. Reichenbach, Modern Philosophy of Science, edited and translated by M. Reichenbach (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1959).
H. Reichenbach, Selected Writings, 2 volumes, R. Cohen and M. Reichenbach, eds. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1978).
D. Ruelle, Chaotic Evolution and Strange Attractors (University Press, Cambridge, 1989).
D. Ruelle, Hasard et Chaos; Chance and Chaos (Uniersity Press, Princeton, 1991).
A. Shimony, Search for a Naturalistic World View, 2 volumes (University Press, Cambridge, 1993).
A. Soulez, ed., Manifeste du Cercle de Vienne et autres écrits: Carnap, Hahn, Neurath, Schlick, Waissmann, Wittgenstein (Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1986).
W. Stegmüller, Probleme und Resulate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophie. Band 2: Theorie und Erfahrung. Zweiter Halbband: Theoriestrukturen und Theoriendynamik (Springer, Heidelberg, 1973).
W. Stegmüller, The Structuralist View of Theories. A Possible Analogue of the Bourbaki Programme in Physical Science (Springer, Heidelberg, 1979).
P. Veyne, Comment on écrit ľhistoire (Seuil, Paris, 1971).
P. Veyne, “Foucault révolutionne ľhistoire,” in Comment on écrit ľhistoire et Foucault révolutionne ľhistoire (Seuil, Paris, 1978).
S. Walter, Hermann Minkowski et la mathématisation de la théorie de la relativité, 1905–1915, Doctoral Thesis in Epistemology and History of Sciences, Université Paris 7-Denis Diderot, 1996.
M. Wartofsky, Conceptual Foundations of Scientific Thought: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science (Mac Millan, London, 1968).
H. Weyl, Gruppentheorie und Quantenmechanik (Hirzel, Leipzig, 1928, 2nd edn., 1931); translation by H. P. Robertson, The Theory of Groups and Quantum Mechanics (Methuen, London, 1931; Dover, New York, 1950).
J. A. Wheeler, and W. H. Zurek, eds., Quantum Theory of Measurement (University Press, Princeton, 1983).
Wiener Kreis, Wissenschaftliche Weltaufflassung: der Wiener Kreis (Wolf, Wien, 1929).
E. Zahar, Einstein’s Revolution. A Study in Heuristic (Open Court, La Salle, IL, 1989).
E. Zahar, “Againts the (alleged) divorce between science and philosophy: Comments on M. Paty’s “La matière dérobée,” Rivista di Storia della Scienza, Ser. II, 2, 191–208 (1994).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Paty, M. (2003). Epistemic Operations and Formalized Epistemology: Contribution to the Study of the Role of Epistemic Operations in Scientific Theories. In: Mugur-Schächter, M., van der Merwe, A. (eds) Quantum Mechanics, Mathematics, Cognition and Action. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 129. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48144-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48144-8_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1120-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48144-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive